My First 4 Cards Ever... But, they're Good!

[Crystal_Bearer]

There's no picture on the last card because I haven't found one yet. Please note that none of the images on this card are mine, and that they belong to the quite talented people who made them. Cheers to them!

 

 

I'm most interested on whether or not the first of these cards is balanced. Please let me know what you think. Thank you everyone!

 

-Me

---

Please forgive me if I am not allowed to post a poll on the thread. I read through the rules, but it's been a while. I skimmed them again to see if there is anything against it, and i saw nothing. So... please don't hold it against me; thanks!

 

-Me

[LiAM]

some cards are OP, some OCG errors

 

not much else except for the last card, it has o image.

 

toehr than that there ok?

[Master of Shadows]

Bad 1/10

[Crystal_Bearer]

Ok... any feedback that's not one word?

 

Also... I tried to make them cards that I would want to put into my deck, but that would not be the 'sought after' card. So, I didn't want them under-powered. At the same time, that's why the first card is flooded with mitigating factors.

 

Lastly, please actually read what I've written. lol, I spent all that time writing it. :P

 

-Me

[Man0waR]

epic failyar!!!!!

[K.B. strategist]

^I, unlike some of those other idiots, will actually take the time to give this a decent review, rather then simply stating "bad!" or "failure!".

 

Attack or Defense Position

Field = field

Monsters = monsters

Monster Card

LIGHT, DARK Attribute (not type)

Lower = decrease

 

There are also numerous wording problems, and you shouldn't make Divine-Beasts as they are not realistic. Change the Type to Fiend.

 

Take out the link in the spell and just post it in the thread. You must also give full image credit (that is, give a link to where you found them and/or say who was the artist) or this will be locked.

 

Original, balanced* effects and excellent pics. You also seem to have taken the time to at least look at some of the words that require capitalization in the ocg/grammar thread, which makes you better then most new members. Excellent for your first cards.

 

NMR: 8.7/10

SR: 6.5/10

 

*the first is balanced because of the incredible cost and effort to bring it out. On top of that, it doesn't have the necessary attack to make an OTK, which therefore would likely give your opponent a win soon after, seeing the speed and level of monster removal in the current meta. Perhaps though you should increase the ATK decrease, just to make it fully balanced.

[Death's Seduction]

for your first cards really good 7/10

[Sleepy]

I leave any judgement of the other card to everyone else :) but I'm only going to rate the merciful prinsess because it really fits the name with the effect.... although fairy Type monsters usually have a deck where the controller doesn't reseive any damage..(sanctuary in the sky) 9/10.................if you wonder why I just graded that one is because I feel lazy today..... and only selected the card that atracted my attension the most .lol.

[Yugiohrulez!]

Bad 1/10

 

 

What's your reasoning? you dont just go and look and say "oh, this card is the worst, but i dont know why." I say the effect is good for the level and power of the card, so i give it a 99%. Good job!