Kryuzei Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 It's been a while since I made a card so. . Anway, comments are appreciated :DI do realize that this card might be slightly overpowered, but tell me what you think ^^; ver.3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuelingDude2 Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 oh my god. That pic isn't even remotley close to being a yugioh card, the effect is okay but the pic is really UN-yugioh. She's holding her panties (if she even has any!) and her boobs are showing! 3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spire Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 I don't like the pic. OCG errors: tributing = Tributing , monster card = Monster Card And yes, it is overpowered. Add a restiction to the monster summoned, or add a drawback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryuzei Posted December 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 *cackle*cackle*cackle*Realistic art that's been spawning in the realistic thread are boring, so I decided to change it a little. But okay, I'll get what you meant so I changed it to another version.oh my god. That pic isn't even remotley close to being a yugioh card, the effect is okay but the pic is really UN-yugioh. She's holding her panties (if she even has any!) and her boobs are showing!Damn you can see it ! lolol. Also, I thought they changed the rules in here : http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-84638.html About the effect, I still can't decide it though. How about this ? Here it is : I was trying to erase the possibility of loop of this card by stating that this card cannot be Special Summoned. While this card effect can be use easily by using Soul Release, the drawback is that while you have 5 monster in your field, you will have lesser hand in return. Not to mention that cards that were special summoned by it will be removed from play instead. Well, if it's still overpowered I think I can tune it a little bit again. Anyway, comments ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Change to Tributing, change Level to 1, change take to remove, If you remove. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryuzei Posted December 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 I see, thanks for the comment :DI will fix it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 about your second version...the first time you wrote spell counters (max 5) you wrote spell cards (max 5) ........ I suggest that the monsters cannot attack on the turn they are summoned...... that way you couldn't add 3 blue eyes and 2 spiral serpents to your hand and then special summon them and attack with almost 15000 damage instantly...^-^" also, change the part of take card(s) as many as the spell counter on this card for something like.....add cards from your Graveyard to your hand equal to the number of Spell counters on this card.and follow Proffesor Cobras's advise :) ...................8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryuzei Posted December 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 I put it that way (Special Summon monster) is that because the current deck are almost that overwhelming ^^; Though I agree, so that I changed the effect again. Here's the edited version.. . .Though I don't really understand what Professor Cobra said about "Change take to remove" . . So, here it is :Please comment it :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Don't have to worry about what he say right now because you already corrected it LOL!!!the card looks better (effect and pic :) )check where it says add cards from your Graveyard to your hand equal to the number of Spell counters on this card. because I think you wrote hands instead of hand 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raelen Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 Good OCG! Your new picture sounds better than what you had previously.Keep it up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 "take cards as many as the Spell Counters on this card" ^^Not sure if that's worded correctly^^ Everything else looks fine. 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryuzei Posted December 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 So, the right one is hand instead of 'hands' ?Thank you everyone :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantasy Dreamz Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 dunno about the removing and placing counters.......i thought that a card can only have counters while its face up on the field..if the card is removed from the field or flip face down, the counters vanishes..the pix is smexy....... but its as someone say.... it doesnt suit yugioh....(i personally dont have any problem with it).......................6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryuzei Posted December 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 It didin't state remove counters. It said as many counters that was on that card (Well, at least I think it like that ^^;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted December 15, 2008 Report Share Posted December 15, 2008 I'm not squinting to read tiny font.Grimlock's pic is overused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.