tonisanoob Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 seeign as the people int he tcg section CAN actually make decent cards i propose that a specialised tcg section thread be made for all the actual decent cardmakers on the site this way out cards woudl get discussed im a more proffesiional way amirite? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 Don't we have six sections for card making already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megaworm Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 ^ most of them suck, and are filled with n00bs and crappy spellers. But i agree, there is already 6. Seven would probably get spammed by 12 year olds with o'p'ed dragon demon angel ice zombie monsters with uneven Attack and craptastical effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 So we hand-pick the most skilled people, give them a private section, and say "Screw you" to everyone not picked? Awesome idea is awesome.[/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megaworm Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 agreed. eSegregation is win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 agreed to the Idea, probably need posting requirments like 1) must have made____ posts in the TCG or Deck Forum2) Must post some kind of card to be allowed to continue posting, to demonstraight skill3) other things as deemed fit by mods Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megaworm Posted December 17, 2008 Report Share Posted December 17, 2008 add "OCG fluency" in there too. What good is a card if the effects are fubar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.