GMOTSS Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord JZ of the Enigma Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 Personally I like it, the Six Samurai are my favorite archetype(I hope that's how it is spelled) but I believe that you should at least add a cost, the card is slightly overpowered. Having two Six Samurai is a little advantageous for the deck. Two would allow the person to activate the effect of the Grandmaster and the Great Shogun, also since they are special summoned they activate the effect of Six Samurai United. So while I like the card, it could be a little bit of a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 Six Samurai support is always nice. Please allow me to fix the OCG, however. "Select 2 "Six Samurai" monsters from either player's Graveyards and Special Summon them. This card's effect cannot be negated." My opinion would be that this card would be Semi-Limited to Limited, regardless of only working for Six Samurais. 7/10 Picture could be a bit better too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Hate Snatch Steal Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 You should add a cost and/or drop the unnegateable part, for now its overpowered. Maybe make it only unable to be negated by monster effects? Since most locks (such as gladiator beasts) use monster effects to negate spells. Something like: "Discard 1 card; special summon 2 "six samurai" monsters from either player's graveyard. This card's activation and effect cannot be negated by a monster effect." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted December 30, 2008 Report Share Posted December 30, 2008 OP'd. There's already a Trap that does this that's balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.