Guest Chaos Pudding Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 I'm making this topic again so I can compare it with the ones I've posted on TCGPlayer and Pojo. It seems that, for some reason, DAD is too debatable in its banworth, and so I've gone for a more universally accepted broken card. Please note that this is what you think SHOULD be done, not what you think WILL be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 It wins games. Good card is good. Lock it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 It should be banned, Malicous and many other cards are easy cards for it to tribute and it punishes the opponent for having monster with 1500 or more ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay.P. Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 IMO a ban is the only thing this card deserves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 Ban. Now. Example: P1: I tribute my 2 monster to summon BEWD!P2: I tribute D-Hero Malicious and and activate CCV.P1: Crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 Ban. Now. Example: P1: I tribute my 2 monster to summon BEWD!P2: I tribute D-Hero Malicious and and activate CCV.P1: Crap. That argument could be used to justify banning Trap Hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 no it shouldnt be bannedsomone should go throo time and erase from history the idea of this card ever being created Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 no it shouldnt be bannedsomone should go throo time and erase from history the idea of this card ever being created This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 A card that punishes opponents merely for having monsters that fulfill the criteria of "over 1500 attack". Though it is a -2 to the duelist who uses, the fact that it'll frequently be hitting more cards in your opponents hand and then for their remaining few draw phases. It is counterable in the Living Arrow + Mammoth Graveyard + Kuriboh + Multiply combo, but Counterability is never an excuse to keep a broken card banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 Ban. Now. Example: P1: I tribute my 2 monster to summon BEWD!P2: I tribute D-Hero Malicious and and activate CCV.P1: Crap. wait, wait... do you play with BEWD?? and summon it by tribute instead special summon?? then you deserve to lose... ¬¬ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alastar Rainford Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 Uhmm Why should it be banned3 turns without 1500ATK monster big whup if someone runs a Exodia Deck3 turns sending monsters with 1500 ATK or more to the grave when Dark Calling is in hand I find no reason why it should be banned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 Uhmm Why should it be banned3 turns without 1500ATK monster big whup if someone runs a Exodia Deck3 turns sending monsters with 1500 ATK or more to the grave when Dark Calling is in hand I find no reason why it should be banned Naming one deck or one card that CCV doesn't effect is pointless. Besides, look at the huge effect CCV has in Tele-DAD. DAD comes out, remove Malicious in your Graveyard to Special malicious, CCV malicious, ect ect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 those who wants this one banned in fact has never used it... i had one and tried to splash it in some decks, not working... i'm selling it BTW, in spanish... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 those who wants this one banned in fact has never used it... i had one and tried to splash it in some decks' date=' not working... i'm selling it BTW, in spanish...[/quote'] 20 Dollars. I'll pay Shipping. :D. Anyway, I've used it. And I've realized when a broken card is broken, it needs to be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alastar Rainford Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 I am just saying there are ways around this cards effectso why ban it.Your reason:It destroys Tele-dadwell than finally there is a card to stop it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 ok, but those 20 only will pay for worldwide shipping... or trade me for one in english >=) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted January 3, 2009 Report Share Posted January 3, 2009 I am just saying there are ways around this cards effectso why ban it.Your reason:It destroys Tele-dadwell than finally there is a card to stop it. Yeah it kills Tele-DAD, but it also works Great in Tele-DAD, espicially since you've alredy splashed in Dark Monsters to begin with. @Orochi: I meant 20 dollars for the card itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 It wins games. Good card is good. Lock it up. i haven't noticed this comment... and how CCV wins games?? deals direct damage?? swarm powerful monsters?? how?!?!?! @Orochi: I meant 20 dollars for the card itself. emm... no thanks, i know that i can get more, in fact someone here offers 1 CCV in english and lot of stuff... other guy is offering me a PSP... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 those who wants this one banned in fact has never used it... ITT: Vague generalizations. Also' date=' I've never used Six Sense, but I'm fairly certain it's still ridiculously overpowered. The fact that it destroys 1500 and higher attackers for the next three turns with the low cost of "a monster at less then 1000" makes it unacceptable at a number higher then 1. i had one and tried to splash it in some decks, not working... Learn2buildadeckbetter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemniscate Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 It wins games. Good card is good. Lock it up. Random Player: Wow!!!!! My Doma, Angel of Silence just won the duel!!!!! Nate12345: Quick!!!!! Lock it up!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alastar Rainford Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 It wins games. Good card is good. Lock it up. Random Player: Wow!!!!! My Neo-Spacian Glow Moss just won the duel!!!!! Nate12345: Quick!!!!! Lock it up!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 @the one guy who voted "No" in the poll: Explain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alastar Rainford Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 I did explain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 I love how all the guys who decided to quote my post are all dimwitted unskilled players. If you can't understand how CCV win games, how the hell did you decide it was ban worthy? Has any of you guys who quoted my post actually activated a CCV in a non online game before? Have you ever sat there at a tournament and seen your opponent fold to pressure knowing that He / she has no way out because his/her moves are telegraphed so much that a blind man could see them? Or is it because You yourself we're the Victims of such play, and your ready to scream "OMG that card is too expensive and broken, Ban IT!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alastar Rainford Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 No I am the type that has fallen victim to it and I really don't care for itI am just saying,who cares if they see every card I draw for three turns1500ATK and higherThey can't see you preset FDsso what do you do start SSing monsters uneffected by trapsAll this card does is send cards to the gravebig whoopSO Why ban something that has so many loopholes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.