Jump to content

Should Crush Card Virus be Forbidden?


Should Crush Card Virus be Forbidden?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Should Crush Card Virus be Forbidden?

    • Yes.
      16
    • No.
      2


Recommended Posts

No I am the type that has fallen victim to it and I really don't care for it

I am just saying' date='who cares if they see every card I draw for three turns

1500ATK and higher

They can't see you preset FDs

so what do you do

start SSing monsters uneffected by traps

All this card does is send cards to the grave

big whoop

SO Why ban something that has so many loopholes

[/quote']

 

ITT: "Kaiba! Before you activated your CCV, I had already set my two Spell cards."

"What?! Thats Impossible Yugi!"

"Nothing is impossible Kaiba! I activate my "I instantly win, cuz im the main Character" Spell Card!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It destroys fields' date=' hands, and Draw Phases (in effect).

 

The cost? A fuckin' 1000 ATK [b']or less[/b] DARK.

 

More than enough fuckin' reason to ban it.

 

Fix'd. And True.

 

Loop Holes:

Pyro Clock of Destiny

Stardust Dragon

Light and Darkness Dragon

Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys

 

Counterability does not justify balance. This card is crippling by itself. You try surviving 3 turns after being hit by this card sucessfully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhmm Why should it be banned

3 turns without 1500ATK monster big whup if someone runs a Exodia Deck

3 turns sending monsters with 1500 ATK or more to the grave when Dark Calling is in hand

I find no reason why it should be banned

 

Lol.

 

Yes it should be banned. People, a better example for CCV target is Sangan or PSZ not Mali.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did

ever heard of NS Deck

almost all monsters are under 1000

 

Who the hell cares if you can survive it? Counterability does not balance a card. If that were true that implies that every card on the ban list should be at 3 and any cards that can't be countered (Super Polymerization' date=' Amplifier, etc) should all be banned.

 

Uhmm Why should it be banned

3 turns without 1500ATK monster big whup if someone runs a Exodia Deck

3 turns sending monsters with 1500 ATK or more to the grave when Dark Calling is in hand

I find no reason why it should be banned

 

Lol.

 

Yes it should be banned. People' date=' a better example for CCV target is Sangan or PSZ not Mali.

[/quote']

 

D.D. Crow feels left out. Thats another example of a commonly used CCV target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Chaos Pudding

What I am saying is not that it should be banned but limited

 

Yes, you've said that multiple times. Yet, except for situational and, quite honestly, bad decks, you have yet to give a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did

ever heard of NS Deck

almost all monsters are under 1000

 

Therefore, we should all run decks with most monsters under 1500atk.

Lol, remember in that Brain Control discussion thread, people were like "It's easy to counter Brain Control, just set monsters instead of summoning them."

 

It's not our fault for not running Botanical Lion to counter Brain Control.

The same concept here. If a card is so powerful that it cripples deck that mains 1500ATK+ monsters (majority of decks does, commonly played or not), should we ban that card, or should we all run Ratboxes so we don't have to suffer major disadvantages?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

«Haruki Adachi», your whole argument for keeping CCV is that it doesn't kill monster under 1500 but since over 90% of all decks main selection of monster fall into CCV's range, that argument falls apart.

 

Loop Holes:

Pyro Clock of Destiny

Stardust Dragon

Light and Darkness Dragon

Sacred Phoenix of Nephthys

1 of these cards are relatively bad, 1 just sucks, 2 aren't that easy to get out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...