Tabris Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Arcana_Force_0_-_The_Foolhttp://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Spirit_Reaperhttp://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Marshmallon Both act, more or less, as makeshift Swords of Revealing Light, preventin' all Battle Damage while they are in Defense Position ex tramplers or direct attackers. They are banworthy, thus. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 You're not going to mention Gellenduo or The Fool? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted January 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Gellenduo's allergic to burn - any kind of burn. The Fool's just inanely hard to tame (he's The Fool, right?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 You set the fool. Is that Hard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuraMaster Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 taro is only ok because you cant have any cards be destroyed (including your opponent's) or it will return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 among those 3 & the other 2 mentioned, only Marshmallon & the Fool are useful. Gellenduo is allergic to damage of any type. Spirit Reaper is fragile against card effects. Taro can just run off the field easily when another card is destroyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Just because Reaper can't stand card effects doesn't make it bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Banworthy?Pfft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Not Banworthy at all, except maybe Spirit Reaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Reaper is good meta-wise, as there are barely any targeting cards that don't destroy. And he isn't banworthy general-wise, as there are many cards that do target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 ITT: Counterability=Balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 None of them are banworthy. Spirit Reaper is the best one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Gellenduo's allergic to burn - any kind of burn. The decks that actually use burn are the decks that will care the least about having their Battle Damage blocked. The Fool's just inanely hard to tame (he's The Fool' date=' right?).[/quote'] What Nate said. @ everyone else: You're all terrible at discussing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Not Banworthy at all' date=' except maybe Spirit Reaper.[/quote']In what ways is Reaper banworthy? You don't see someone winning a game just because they have a Spirit Reaper on their field, do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 ITT: Counterability=Balance. And it isn't why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Because with Logic like this we dont need a Ban list as long as we keep Solemn Judgment at least Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 1 card =/= A huge majority of spells and traps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 If counterability=balance, then DAD is considered balanced if it can be negated. Right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 The amount of cards DAD can be countered by =/= the amount of cards these can be countered by Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 1 card =/= A huge majority of spells and trapsIf you think any cards ability to be countered = its unbanworthness' date=' than you need to have a 1on1 with Crab Helmet. But Bring a pillow, cuz your gonna get your ass quenched. If counterability=balance, then DAD is considered balanced if it can be negated. Right?This Thread seams to think so. But I heard a rumor that it was wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crimson King Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 1 card =/= A huge majority of spells and trapsIf you think any cards ability to be countered = its unbanworthness' date=' than you need to have a 1on1 with Crab Helmet. But Bring a pillow, cuz your gonna get your ass quenched. If counterability=balance, then DAD is considered balanced if it can be negated. Right?This Thread seams to think so. But I heard a rumor that it was wrong.I don't know, I think they may be right(sarcastically). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 1 card =/= A huge majority of spells and trapsIf you think any cards ability to be countered = its unbanworthness' date=' than you need to have a 1on1 with Crab Helmet. But Bring a pillow, cuz your gonna get your ass quenched. If counterability=balance, then DAD is considered balanced if it can be negated. Right?This Thread seams to think so. But I heard a rumor that it was wrong.I don't know, I think they may be right(sarcastically).oh ho ho you clever dog you Nate, counterability doesn't always make it unbanworthy. It's how easily it can be countered, and whether its effect increases the counterability or not. You don't seem to comprehend that. At any rate, what more is Spirit Reaper than a tiny, easily breakable shield that will come back a few times? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iAmNateXero Posted January 4, 2009 Report Share Posted January 4, 2009 Dude, you are on a failure's roll today. 1 more and im awarding you accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 I see the "can't die monsters" on a ranking scale, since forcing some other way to remove it from the field makes it a decent filler in most cases. 1-marshmellow. no drawbacks and 1000 burn, no reason not to use if you have the space.2-spirit reaper. he may be very easy to take out, but having an offensive power as well as being a dark zombie means he can keep on being useful in some way.3-shiba. the fact he comes back to your hand, and only when face up, means he can be repeatedly played. but the fact he goes back when anything dies gives him a small problem. is also a beast-warrior tuner. and cute, but that doesn't have much actual in game effect.4-Gellenduo. with a high ATK as well as a double count for light tributes, he is the only one that can be played in ATK mode and still have a chance of not getting trampled. also, he dies outside of the damage step, so if that makes any sort of combo open up, there ya go.5-the fool. can't be put into DEF mode. enough said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~/Coolio Prime\~ Posted January 5, 2009 Report Share Posted January 5, 2009 Dude' date=' you are on a failure's roll today. 1 more and im awarding you accordingly.[/quote'] At least back up your statements before talking about whom is currently failing please. If I am oblivious to something an empty response won't help me. And an empty response doesn't help you, as that's all you've been saying for awhile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.