Jump to content

this makes no sense


Man0waR

Recommended Posts

What makes no sense that you are asking Calculus help from a Children's Card Game Forum =/

 

Ask your parents or your gf' date=' not from from a random 12 year old =/[/b']

 

The only thing that makes since in this entire thread is bolded in the above quote.

 

Yes. But, the average age of YCM users is 11 actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my claculus professor gave me this-

 

find the derivative if functions K and G are such that:

 

[K]-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

it makes NO since. but derivative functions are SO easy (like cal.1 easy...)

 

What... Isn't this just solving for each different variable? If so, then this equation would be easy. Either way, I'm gonna see if my friend, Spence can do this problem. He's in AP Calculas, (Advanced Calculas), and he says it's the easy math class he's ever taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes no sense that you are asking Calculus help from a Children's Card Game Forum =/

 

Ask your parents or your gf' date=' not from from a random 12 year old =/

[/quote']

 

You are so lucky you got here first, otherwise I would have posted that.

 

Anyways, on topic. Lol. Uhm... did you try to, skip the problem? :?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my claculus professor gave me this-

 

find the derivative if functions K and G are such that:

 

[K]-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

it makes NO since. but derivative functions are SO easy (like cal.1 easy...)

I'm just a ten year old' date=' so I'm just guessing here...but I think

 

[K']-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

[K] = 34.99 - 34.99 = 0 + [G (G to me would be 34.99)] = [G]

 

so [K] = [G] since in this sentence, they are both 34.99

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my claculus professor gave me this-

 

find the derivative if functions K and G are such that:

 

[K]-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

it makes NO since. but derivative functions are SO easy (like cal.1 easy...)

I'm just a ten year old' date=' so I'm just guessing here...but I think

 

[K']-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

[K] = 34.99 - 34.99 = 0 + [G (G to me would be 34.99)] = [G]

 

so [K] = [G] since in this sentence, they are both 34.99

 

Where does it say that G = 34.99?

 

If it's solving for K and G, then here, let me try this.

 

[K]-34.99+[GX+14G]=[G]

K-34.99+GX+14G=G

-14G=-14G

K-34.99+GX=-15G

+34.99=+34.99

 

K+GX=-15G+34.99

-GX=-GX

K=-15G-GX+34.99

 

 

(-15G-GX+34.99)-34.99+GX+14G=G

34.99-34.99=0

-GX+GX=0

All this left is -15G+14G=G

Combine like terms. -1G=G

+1G on both sides.

2G=0

G=0

K=34.99

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my claculus professor gave me this-

 

find the derivative if functions K and G are such that:

 

[K]-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

it makes NO since. but derivative functions are SO easy (like cal.1 easy...)

 

What... Isn't this just solving for each different variable? If so' date=' then this equation would be easy. Either way, I'm gonna see if my friend, Spence can do this problem. He's in AP Calculas, (Advanced Calculas), and he says it's the easy math class he's ever taken.

[/quote']

 

 

my claculus professor gave me this-

 

find the derivative if functions K and G are such that:

 

[K]-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

it makes NO since. but derivative functions are SO easy (like cal.1 easy...)

I'm just a ten year old' date=' so I'm just guessing here...but I think

 

[K']-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

[K] = 34.99 - 34.99 = 0 + [G (G to me would be 34.99)] = [G]

 

so [K] = [G] since in this sentence, they are both 34.99

Dont ask me if your right. I'm in Geometry.

 

Where does it say that G = 34.99?

 

If it's solving for K and G, then here, let me try this.

 

[K]-34.99+[GX+14G]=[G]

K-34.99+GX+14G=G

-14G=-14G

K-34.99+GX=-15G

+34.99=+34.99

 

K+GX=-15G+34.99

-GX=-GX

K=-15G-GX+34.99

 

 

(-15G-GX+34.99)-34.99+GX+14G=G

34.99-34.99=0

-GX+GX=0

All this left is -15G+14G=G

Combine like terms. -1G=G

+1G on both sides.

2G=0

G=0

K=34.99

 

 

You put it to say -1G=1G so that is improbable and impossible. -1G is the opposite of G

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Supreme Gamesmaster

In this case, Youarehere, you forget that zero is its own additive inverse. Should the equation -g = g be obtained, then the equation is as good as solved.

 

so [K] = [G] since in this sentence' date=' they are both 34.99

[/quote']

If k = g, then the solution set would include all real numbers.

 

[spoiler=I'm getting no such convenient answers.]

If k - 34.99 + gx + 14g = 0

k - 34.99 = g(x - 14)

k = g(x - 14) + 34.99

 

(gx - 14g + 34.99) - 34.99 + gx + 14g = 0

(gx - 14g) + (gx + 14g) = 0

2gx = 0

gx = 0

 

 

The way I see it, if x =/= 0, then g = 0; if x = 0, then g =/= 0.

 

[spoiler=Attempt 2]

k - 34.99 + g(x - 14) = g

k - 34.99 + gx - 14g = g

k - 34.99 + gx = 15g

k + gx = 15g + 34.99

 

 

Sheesh, that x throws a wrench in the works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my claculus professor gave me this-

 

find the derivative if functions K and G are such that:

 

[K]-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

it makes NO since. but derivative functions are SO easy (like cal.1 easy...)

 

What... Isn't this just solving for each different variable? If so' date=' then this equation would be easy. Either way, I'm gonna see if my friend, Spence can do this problem. He's in AP Calculas, (Advanced Calculas), and he says it's the easy math class he's ever taken.

[/quote']

 

 

my claculus professor gave me this-

 

find the derivative if functions K and G are such that:

 

[K]-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

it makes NO since. but derivative functions are SO easy (like cal.1 easy...)

I'm just a ten year old' date=' so I'm just guessing here...but I think

 

[K']-34.99+[G(X+2x7)]=[G]

 

[K] = 34.99 - 34.99 = 0 + [G (G to me would be 34.99)] = [G]

 

so [K] = [G] since in this sentence, they are both 34.99

Dont ask me if your right. I'm in Geometry.

 

Where does it say that G = 34.99?

 

If it's solving for K and G, then here, let me try this.

 

[K]-34.99+[GX+14G]=[G]

K-34.99+GX+14G=G

-14G=-14G

K-34.99+GX=-15G

+34.99=+34.99

 

K+GX=-15G+34.99

-GX=-GX

K=-15G-GX+34.99

 

 

(-15G-GX+34.99)-34.99+GX+14G=G

34.99-34.99=0

-GX+GX=0

All this left is -15G+14G=G

Combine like terms. -1G=G

+1G on both sides.

2G=0

G=0

K=34.99

 

 

You put it to say -1G=1G so that is improbable and impossible. -1G is the opposite of G

 

Alright, here's a counter example, which happened to be what G actually equaled. What if G = 0.

 

I just completely destroyed your entire theory with one example. This is why I added G to both sides of the equaltion, because I have to get G by itself and on one side of the equation. Which meant that it had to be 0.

 

Also, I realized earlier that I did some math wrong. Like at the beginning, when I combined like terms, I should have gotten a -13G instead of -15G. :| However, after looking over that, I still would have gotten G to equal 0 anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...