Crush Card Virus should not be banned.

[Guest Chaos Pudding]

It is situational, hardly ever destroys more than 3 cards, and is a Trap.

[Mr. Judgment Dragon]

The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that, it is a game ender most of the time.

[Guest Chaos Pudding]

The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.

[/quote']

 

Prove it. Evidence is everything.

[The Dark One]

EDIT: On further thought, I won't spoil it for any of the brainless YCMers out there.

[GenzoTheHarpist]

I don't understand who these threads are supposed to target when people argue against people they know understand the game.

[SephirothKirby]

It's kind of better as a Trap. If it were a Spell, it would still be amazing, but you wouldn't be able to chain it whenever they waste removal on it or a monster, or commit to swinging with a big monster.

[Guest Chaos Pudding]

I don't understand who these threads are supposed to target when people argue against people they know understand the game.

 

Then you aren't thinking with Portals.

[~Ghost Rare~]

I am sick of this, i call for a ban to be put on certain, people stopping them from entering the tcg,and on certain topics i have been here a few days and have already seen 2 DAD vs JD threads and have been informed of many others, have seen at least 5 lolable threads, and at least 2-3 unacceptable ones

 

I no im being bit extreme but come on some of this sections topics are a disgrace

[Guest Chaos Pudding]

I am sick of this' date=' i call for a ban to be put on certain, people stopping them from entering the tcg,and on certain topics i have been here a few days and have already seen 2 DAD vs JD threads and have been informed of many others, have seen at least 5 lolable threads, and at least 2-3 unacceptable ones

 

I no im being bit extreme but come on some of this sections topics are a disgrace

[/quote']

 

Don't talk about things you clearly have no knowledge about.

[Mr. Judgment Dragon]

The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.

[/quote']

 

Prove it. Evidence is everything.

 

As you wish.

 

Almost any Deck could run at least 3 or more DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK. Even in a good Format with Sangan among other banworthy things banned.

 

This card is a Deck killer. This kills almost any Deck that uses monsters with 1500 or more ATK to achieve a win condition and that would cover almost any conceivable Deck.

[Guest Chaos Pudding]

The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.

[/quote']

 

Prove it. Evidence is everything.

 

As you wish.

 

Almost any Deck could run at least 3 or more DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK. Even in a good Format with Sangan among other banworthy things banned.

 

This card is a Deck killer. This kills almost any Deck that uses monsters with 1500 or more ATK to achieve a win condition and that would cover almost any conceivable Deck.

 

And what are the chances that you'll have both the (Limited) Trap and a suitable monster on the field at the same time when activating CCV would make any sort of impact at all without stacking your deck?

 

Just how many monsters do you actually end up destroying with this card, anyway? From my experience, I rarely hit enough things to break even, advantage-wise.

[~Ghost Rare~]

^ You are playing it at the wrong time then.

[Guest Chaos Pudding]

^ You are playing it at the wrong time then.

 

So you're saying it's situational, then? That's reason enough not to ban it.

[GenzoTheHarpist]

The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.

[/quote']

 

Prove it. Evidence is everything.

 

As you wish.

 

Almost any Deck could run at least 3 or more DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK. Even in a good Format with Sangan among other banworthy things banned.

 

This card is a Deck killer. This kills almost any Deck that uses monsters with 1500 or more ATK to achieve a win condition and that would cover almost any conceivable Deck.

 

And what are the chances that you'll have both the (Limited) Trap and a suitable monster on the field at the same time when activating CCV would make any sort of impact at all without stacking your deck?

 

Just how many monsters do you actually end up destroying with this card, anyway? From my experience, I rarely hit enough things to break even, advantage-wise.

 

Usually over the three-turn period I see 3-5 monsters destroyed. Also it has the advantage of seeing the hand and field, which wrecks any strategy they may have had.

[Guest Chaos Pudding]

The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.

[/quote']

 

Prove it. Evidence is everything.

 

As you wish.

 

Almost any Deck could run at least 3 or more DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK. Even in a good Format with Sangan among other banworthy things banned.

 

This card is a Deck killer. This kills almost any Deck that uses monsters with 1500 or more ATK to achieve a win condition and that would cover almost any conceivable Deck.

 

And what are the chances that you'll have both the (Limited) Trap and a suitable monster on the field at the same time when activating CCV would make any sort of impact at all without stacking your deck?

 

Just how many monsters do you actually end up destroying with this card, anyway? From my experience, I rarely hit enough things to break even, advantage-wise.

 

Usually over the three-turn period I see 3-5 monsters destroyed. Also it has the advantage of seeing the hand and field, which wrecks any strategy they may have had.

 

What's the use of knowing what your opponent has if you have nothing to deal with it?

[GenzoTheHarpist]

The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.

[/quote']

 

Prove it. Evidence is everything.

 

As you wish.

 

Almost any Deck could run at least 3 or more DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK. Even in a good Format with Sangan among other banworthy things banned.

 

This card is a Deck killer. This kills almost any Deck that uses monsters with 1500 or more ATK to achieve a win condition and that would cover almost any conceivable Deck.

 

And what are the chances that you'll have both the (Limited) Trap and a suitable monster on the field at the same time when activating CCV would make any sort of impact at all without stacking your deck?

 

Just how many monsters do you actually end up destroying with this card, anyway? From my experience, I rarely hit enough things to break even, advantage-wise.

 

Usually over the three-turn period I see 3-5 monsters destroyed. Also it has the advantage of seeing the hand and field, which wrecks any strategy they may have had.

 

What's the use of knowing what your opponent has if you have nothing to deal with it?

 

What I meant is that their strategy is messed up because they just had a lot of monsters that may have been important destroyed. Sure they may pull something together that's okay but you'll see it coming.

[Darkerai]

^ You are playing it at the wrong time then.

 

So you're saying it's situational' date=' then? That's reason enough not to ban it.

[/quote']

 

OMG by this logic...

 

Pot of Greed is bad to activate when horus is on the field...that shouldn't be banned.

 

Yata is terriable when your opponent has monsters and no way to get rid of them...unbanned!!!

[Smeg]

...

 

 

Someone actually thinks CCV isn't all that it lives up to be.

 

lolycm.

[~Ghost Rare~]

I am sick of this' date=' i call for a ban to be put on certain, people stopping them from entering the tcg,and on certain topics i have been here a few days and have already seen 2 DAD vs JD threads and have been informed of many others, have seen at least 5 lolable threads, and at least 2-3 unacceptable ones

 

I no im being bit extreme but come on some of this sections topics are a disgrace

[/quote']

 

Don't talk about things you clearly have no knowledge about.

 

Why because im a new member you no more then me, yes obviously i no you can't just put a ban on a member to stop them entering a section, but have you seen some of the topics posted here(Oh you have you posted 1), and i no you can't stop people posting same things over and over but a mod should warn any1 who does or something like that.

 

Chaos Pudding you say i clearly no nothing, by the looks of this thread it is you that no's nothing

[SephirothKirby]

So being limited, it's fine? Just because something bad for the game happens less times doesn't mean it isn't still bad for the game, it just means it's less likely to occur.

 

Under that logic, Chaos Emperor Dragon could be limited to 1 because it's less likely to occur.

 

They both win games, neither should be allowed at any number.

[Father Wolf]

U best be trollin

[Von Csent]

Does anyone actually believe that that is Pudding's true opinion? You all fell into a troll hole. Pity.

[DARKPLANT RISING]

If what I think is correct, Crush Card Virus is one of the best only-Dark cards. It destroys all your opponent's strong cards, which includes:

Snipe Hunter

Any Monarch

DAD

Judgement

and much more. Plus, it lets you see your opponent's hand and top 3 cards of his deck. Plus, If you have luck, you fan stop your opponent from DRAWING for 2 or 3 turns. Cool! Super Cool!

I have always envied Konami for making it restricted. It simply Rocks. Crush Card Virus is easily one of the best restricted besides Monster reborn and some others. It should never be banned for good reasons, and if it is, a wing of YGO tactics will be completely destroyed.

[Toffee.]

I <3 this topic

[Jericho]

The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.

[/quote']

 

Prove it. Evidence is everything.

 

As you wish.

 

Almost any Deck could run at least 3 or more DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK. Even in a good Format with Sangan among other banworthy things banned.

 

This card is a Deck killer. This kills almost any Deck that uses monsters with 1500 or more ATK to achieve a win condition and that would cover almost any conceivable Deck.

 

And what are the chances that you'll have both the (Limited) Trap and a suitable monster on the field at the same time when activating CCV would make any sort of impact at all without stacking your deck?

 

Just how many monsters do you actually end up destroying with this card, anyway? From my experience, I rarely hit enough things to break even, advantage-wise.

 

Usually over the three-turn period I see 3-5 monsters destroyed. Also it has the advantage of seeing the hand and field, which wrecks any strategy they may have had.

 

You know, because when you play Chess, another game of strategy, you can't see every move your opponent could make.