The Dark One Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.[/quote'] Prove it. Evidence is everything. As you wish. Almost any Deck could run at least 3 or more DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK. Even in a good Format with Sangan among other banworthy things banned. This card is a Deck killer. This kills almost any Deck that uses monsters with 1500 or more ATK to achieve a win condition and that would cover almost any conceivable Deck. And what are the chances that you'll have both the (Limited) Trap and a suitable monster on the field at the same time when activating CCV would make any sort of impact at all without stacking your deck? Just how many monsters do you actually end up destroying with this card, anyway? From my experience, I rarely hit enough things to break even, advantage-wise. I see no reason why CCV should be limited. Let us assume, then, that it is at three, for the intents of this discussion. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 ... Someone actually thinks CCV isn't all that it lives up to be. lolycm. Lmao. @TC: Crush Card Virus has a laughable cost and a game-wrecking effect. The reward is much greater than what you have to pay for it, and it doesn't really require any skill. I mean, how many Decks would be hurt from running 1-4 DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK? There's Sangan, Spirit Reaper, and even Fiend's Sanctuary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 This Thread is not serious is it? :? If the DARK monsters happen to be Sangan, Necrogardna, or stuff like that, it doesn't matter if you are Tributing them because you are just making the set-up to protect your Strategy (Necro) or getting to search a monster to replace the one you lost and thin your Deck (Sangan). If its not one of those options, loosing a DARK monster with 1000 ATK or less is a lolcondition in exchange for looking at your opponent's hand and field. Oh!, and as a bonus you get to destroy all monsters you see with 1500 ATK or more, isn't that lovely? even if it destroyed 1 monster on the turn you activated it, its worth it for the info it gives you about the opponent's strategy.You think its a situational card?, keep the card if you draw it until a DARK monster appears OR play without thinking about that card with the rest of your Strategy, if it appears, GREAT FOR YOU. How is that situational? under your reasoning Stardust Dragon is highly situational because it requires to match the exact Levels and needs to wait for your opponent to try to destroy something :) Of course you maybe will (at some time) have that worst case scenario where you don't get to destroy anything for all 3 turns. If something like that couldn't possibly happen, this card would be banned a long time ago. If it was a Spell it would be great for my Spell Counter Deck <3 So... if I guessed right, what you meant is that this card is not that good. Why don't you try using the anime version :lol:When a DARK monster with an ATK of 1000 or less you control is destroyed, look at all monsters on your opponent's field and all cards on their hand and Deck. Then, send all monsters with 1500 ATK or more to the Graveyard.is that good enough for you :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 dont feed the troll ¬_¬ he obviously kidding fs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 dont feed the troll ¬_¬ he obviously kidding fs Either he's kidding or maybe he actually wants people to provide a decent arguement as to why it deserves to be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brentxbanshee Posted May 2, 2009 Report Share Posted May 2, 2009 Hmm, Nowadays people are useing alot oh synchros. Most tuners dont have 1500 ATK points. So Killing there other monsters is not effecting there snychro summons. I dont see why it should be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 dont feed the troll ¬_¬ he obviously kidding fs sorry ^-^ I knew he is trolling (or at least that's what it looks like), but I felt like discussing this morning. Well, the "Troll" is not taking the role seriously since he hasn't answered the last comments ;) (maybe he got bored) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luis2 Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 I lol at the picture. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Von Csent Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 Well' date=' the "Troll" is not taking the role seriously since he hasn't answered the last comments ;) (maybe he got bored)[/quote'] The goal of any troll is to get the arguing started, then shut up and watch the fighting ensue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 Hmm' date=' Nowadays people are useing alot oh synchros. Most tuners dont have 1500 ATK points. So Killing there other monsters is not effecting there snychro summons. I dont see why it should be banned.[/quote'] That's a great idea, lets never ban anything that can't hurt tuners. Hey, let's unban Imperial Order; it can only stop spells, not tuners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 I HAS EVIDENCE. I got CCV'd twice in the same match in a game at the nationals and I still won ;D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 I HAS EVIDENCE. I got CCV'd twice in the same match in a game at the nationals and I still won ;D Don't tell me CCV can't touch you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blazeking777 Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 I actually know Chaospudding and we had this conversation out he's not trolling and he truly believes CCV does not warrant a ban. I'm more on the side of the ban but he is steadfast in his opinions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.[/quote'] Prove it. Evidence is everything. As you wish. Almost any Deck could run at least 3 or more DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK. Even in a good Format with Sangan among other banworthy things banned. This card is a Deck killer. This kills almost any Deck that uses monsters with 1500 or more ATK to achieve a win condition and that would cover almost any conceivable Deck. PACMAN, wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.[/quote'] Prove it. Evidence is everything. As you wish. Almost any Deck could run at least 3 or more DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK. Even in a good Format with Sangan among other banworthy things banned. This card is a Deck killer. This kills almost any Deck that uses monsters with 1500 or more ATK to achieve a win condition and that would cover almost any conceivable Deck. NECROBUMP, wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Fix'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 I don't understand who these threads are supposed to target when people argue against people they know understand the game. People who claim they understand the game but don't know what they're talking about get ripped a new one if they're just parroting Crabisms or whatever. People who claim the understand the game and do know what they're talking about get to practice their debating skills. Lulz are had, AND people learn. It's without a doubt one of the better topics on YCM. Edit: I just noticed this topic is from May. Who necrobumped? *Gets a paddle* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 The dedication required for this is laughably pathetic. Not only that' date=' it is a game ender most of the time.[/quote'] Prove it. Evidence is everything. As you wish. Almost any Deck could run at least 3 or more DARK monsters with 1000 or less ATK. Even in a good Format with Sangan among other banworthy things banned. This card is a Deck killer. This kills almost any Deck that uses monsters with 1500 or more ATK to achieve a win condition and that would cover almost any conceivable Deck. NECROBUMP, wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Fix'd You ignored that VVV I actually know Chaospudding and we had this conversation out he's not trolling and he truly believes CCV does not warrant a ban. I'm more on the side of the ban but he is steadfast in his opinions. I thought it was recent. Idc. I just want PACMAN to reign :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 I actually know Chaospudding and we had this conversation out he's not trolling and he truly believes CCV does not warrant a ban. I'm more on the side of the ban but he is steadfast in his opinions. LOLtopic revival. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 I had forgotten that I had even made this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kira the Savior Posted June 20, 2009 Report Share Posted June 20, 2009 I wondered why I didnt recognize this and yet it had gotten so long....damn necrobumpers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.