Saturn of Elemia Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Out of the three Egyptian Gods, I have always been fond of 'Obelisk the Tormentor'. There are 2 reasons for this (and feel free to laugh at these reasons): 1) Its destruction effect goes great with Scapegoat2) It's a part of my 'Legend of UBERGoat' gag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 You must Tribute 3 monsters you control to Normal Summon this card. The Normal Summon of this card cannot be negated. When this card is Normal Summoned' date=' a Spell, Trap, or Effect Monster Card cannot be activated. This card cannot be targeted by the effects of a Spell, Trap or Effect Monsters. If this card is Special Summoned, it is sent to the Graveyard during the End Phase. You can Tribute 2 monsters to destroy all monsters your opponent controls. This card cannot declare an attack the turn this effect is activated.[/i'] You must Tribute 3 monsters you control to Normal Summon this card. The Normal Summon of this card cannot be negated. When this card is Normal Summoned' date=' a Spell, Trap, or Effect Monster Card cannot be activated. This card cannot be targeted by the effects of a Spell, Trap or Effect Monsters. This card's original ATK and DEF become 1000 x each card in your hand. When your opponent Normal Summons or Flip Summons a monster with 2000 DEF or less, destroy it.[/i'] Now discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Also' date=' Slifer makes about as much sense as the card's name as Osiris does. The actual Osiris had nothing to do with the sky, dragons, being red, having two mouths, destroying things, or just about anything else conceivably relevant to the card. >_>[/quote'] And did the actual Obelisk involve torment, blue Younger Toguro's that became a god, having wings, destroying lots of things, or just about anything else conceivably relevant to the card? You must Tribute 3 monsters you control to Normal Summon this card. The Normal Summon of this card cannot be negated. When this card is Normal Summoned' date=' a Spell, Trap, or Effect Monster Card cannot be activated. This card cannot be targeted by the effects of a Spell, Trap or Effect Monsters. If this card is Special Summoned, it is sent to the Graveyard during the End Phase. You can Tribute 2 monsters to destroy all monsters your opponent controls. This card cannot declare an attack the turn this effect is activated.[/i'] You must Tribute 3 monsters you control to Normal Summon this card. The Normal Summon of this card cannot be negated. When this card is Normal Summoned' date=' a Spell, Trap, or Effect Monster Card cannot be activated. This card cannot be targeted by the effects of a Spell, Trap or Effect Monsters. This card's original ATK and DEF become 1000 x each card in your hand. When your opponent Normal Summons or Flip Summons a monster with 2000 DEF or less, destroy it.[/i'] Now discuss Still Slifer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 1. Osiris2. Obelisk3. Ra[/disc] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Also' date=' Slifer makes about as much sense as the card's name as Osiris does. The actual Osiris had nothing to do with the sky, dragons, being red, having two mouths, destroying things, or just about anything else conceivably relevant to the card. >_>[/quote'] And did the actual Obelisk involve torment, blue Younger Toguro's that became a god, having wings, destroying lots of things, or just about anything else conceivably relevant to the card? No, but nobody argues over whether to call it Obelisk or Obelisk. People do argue over whether to call the red one Slifer or Osiris, and I seem to remember that Blood Rose can't stand anyone referring to anything by its dub name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Also' date=' Slifer makes about as much sense as the card's name as Osiris does. The actual Osiris had nothing to do with the sky, dragons, being red, having two mouths, destroying things, or just about anything else conceivably relevant to the card. >_>[/quote'] And did the actual Obelisk involve torment, blue Younger Toguro's that became a god, having wings, destroying lots of things, or just about anything else conceivably relevant to the card? If I recall correctly, Obelisk isn't the name of a God. It's a type of a tower. (Which makes the line 'suck on my Obelisk' all the more funny.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Also' date=' Slifer makes about as much sense as the card's name as Osiris does. The actual Osiris had nothing to do with the sky, dragons, being red, having two mouths, destroying things, or just about anything else conceivably relevant to the card. >_>[/quote'] And did the actual Obelisk involve torment, blue Younger Toguro's that became a god, having wings, destroying lots of things, or just about anything else conceivably relevant to the card? If I recall correctly, Obelisk isn't the name of a God. It's a type of a tower. (Which makes the line 'suck on my Obelisk' all the more funny.) I know, which means it makes less sense. Also' date=' Slifer makes about as much sense as the card's name as Osiris does. The actual Osiris had nothing to do with the sky, dragons, being red, having two mouths, destroying things, or just about anything else conceivably relevant to the card. >_>[/quote'] And did the actual Obelisk involve torment, blue Younger Toguro's that became a god, having wings, destroying lots of things, or just about anything else conceivably relevant to the card? No, but nobody argues over whether to call it Obelisk or Obelisk. People do argue over whether to call the red one Slifer or Osiris, and I seem to remember that Blood Rose can't stand anyone referring to anything by its dub name. Your argument is that neither name fits the red one at all. My counter-argument is that "Obelisk" doesn't suit the blue one either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Manga name is "The God of the Obelisk" so it's not his name so much as his "god-theme". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I don't think having 2 mouthes is good unless the effect is. If Obelisk had 3 mouthes, would he be better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 I don't think having 2 mouthes is good unless the effect is. If Obelisk had 3 mouthes' date=' would he be better?[/quote'] Number of mouths are completely irrelevant to the strength of an effect. Obelisk would look ridiculous with three mouths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 yeah lolIt would look like some blue giant with a red crystal on its head and sharp teeth had 3 mouthes sticking out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Roxas Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Thank you Captain Obvious. For your astounding creativity, would you like a cookie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Thank you Captain Obvious. For your astounding creativity' date=' would you like a cookie?[/quote'] Can i have the cookie instead? I believe I deserve it more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Incognito:. Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 slifer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetsu-plant Posted May 7, 2009 Report Share Posted May 7, 2009 god that isn't even a poll Slifer is obviously the victor here his effect is better his look is better. the color red is better too. He won by overkill over Obelisk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.