Jump to content

Brrrr... is it just me or is it frozen in here? [10/60]

TrickyPooBoy

By TrickyPooBoy
in Realistic Cards

How is this set so far?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. How is this set so far?

    • Awesome!
      5
    • Horrid!
      8

Recommended Posts

TrickyPooBoy Newbie

TrickyPooBoy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Fuzzie,

 

1. This deck is based on face-down attack position. It does exist in a card called "Darkness Approaches"

2. Debris Dragon is lv4 tuner.

 

It's not a thing I came up with. See?

 

DarknessApproachesMRL-EN-C.jpg

 

Please stop saying there is no such thing as face-down Attack Position. Because I have Kasuki Takahashi on my side. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Brendano Harns Rookie

Brendano Harns

Posted
Posted

Fuzzie' date='

 

1. This deck is based on face-down attack position. It does exist in a card called "Darkness Approaches"

2. Debris Dragon is lv4 tuner.

 

It's not a thing I came up with. See?

 

[img']http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/yugioh/images/b/b6/DarknessApproachesMRL-EN-C.jpg[/img]

 

Please stop saying there is no such thing as face-down Attack Position. Because I have Kasuki Takahashi on my side. :D

 

That's a really old card, which doesn't fit in with the new OCG very well. Also, I'm just saying that making it a Tuner OPs it a little.

 

 

 

 

LOL

 

Was that necessary?

 

was that neccesary?

 

Was THAT neccesary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OhHerro Newbie

OhHerro

Posted
Posted

' date='says the newbie.

[/quote']

 

Just because someone is new to the website, it doesn't mean you can't accept a criticism from them. There are people who have been here forever and who have thousands of posts who either cannot make cards for crap (read: those who don't make cards, or some people whose names don't come to mind) or are complete spammers (read: @ngelMoney), and if you're going to be unwilling to accept a comment from someone who may be right or have some sort of a point simply based on their "star level", then you sir, can get the hell off the internet. You should be ashamed of yourself for being so disrespectful towards persons who more than likely have a valid point and for being so closed-minded that you can't accept the slightest criticisms. That's the point of this section - to post your cards up for constructive criticism. I apologize for being so harsh, but it's the honest truth, and if you're not mature enough to accept this comment for what it is and take something from it, then I'm sure it will be clear to most people here that you're simply not worth respecting or talking to.

 

In regards to your cards, the images are simply sloppy and hardly realistic. These cards should be in "Any Other Cards" because quite frankly, a card with an image like those on your cards would never in a thousand decades be considered for a legit Yu-Gi-Oh! card. Moreover, the effects are relatively unoriginal, and the names could do with some work.

 

2/10

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brendano Harns Rookie

Brendano Harns

Posted
Posted

Unfortunately, nowadays, we need to crack down harder on the n00bs.

 

In this case, I can say that was not a mature thing to say, but ranting helps no one.

 

The newer members need to learn general respect. Some newer members are double accounters, and this also filters them out as well.

 

Do I want to have to go harder on the n00bs? No.

 

Do I have to? Unfortunately, yes, just a little.

 

Also, rating someone's cards and slapping them in the face because thy went against something you believe is total immaturaty, so don't even get me started about what is mature and what isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OhHerro Newbie

OhHerro

Posted
Posted

The newer members need to learn general respect. Some newer members are double accounters' date=' and this also filters them out as well.

[/quote']

 

Why should newer members show any sort of respect for those who consistently spam and write useless threads? Respect must be earned by your ACTIONS, not simply your post count. @ngelMoney feels that he/she is hella hardcore simply because he/she has ~3k posts, when in actuality I have more than likely made more meaningful posts in the 63 posts I myself have made than all the posts he/she has made. Moreover, I would love for you to find for me a post created by @ngelMoney that is longer than any post I have ever written on this account. If you can, compare it to any post I have ever written as JerryFreelance (clearly, fan-fics and the like would not count).

 

Also' date=' rating someone's cards and slapping them in the face because thy went against something you believe is total immaturaty, so don't even get me started about what is mature and what isn't.

[/quote']

 

The only thing is I'm not "slapping him/her in the face" simply because they went against something I believe in. The cards are that bad. I was merely pointing out a fault in his/her character that it would do him/her a great service to correct.

 

If you would like me to give a full individual rating, I can do so:

 

FrostByte: The fact that you need five monsters on the field to summon it automatically brings it down to 1/10. Adding on top of that that the four unspecified monsters have to add up to exactly 10 stars brings it down to a 0.5/10, especially considering the average level at this point of each required monster not named the required Building Block is 2.5, it's damn near impossible to get this card out. Crappy art and a mediocre effect bring it down to a 0/10. At least it's immune to the spells and traps that would rape it before the five turns it needs to activate its effect... Because of this, and since I'm feeling generous, the overall rating for this card is a 0.1/10

 

Blizzard Blitz: Lack of ANY originality whatsoever, combined with brokenness gives it an automatic 0/10

 

Bopsicle: First of all, there's no such thing as a Frozen Pizza. Write out its complete name. Deck is capitalized, and the next part of the sentence makes no sense. I'm done reading it. 0/10 because the effect makes no sense.

 

Building Block: No originality. 4/10 simply because Spirit Reaper rapes.

 

Need I continue? If I did, there's a good chance I would amend my previous rating and lower it, so I highly doubt you want me to continue.

 

This should be more than enough to back up my previous post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brendano Harns Rookie

Brendano Harns

Posted
Posted

The newer members need to learn general respect. Some newer members are double accounters' date=' and this also filters them out as well.

[/quote']

 

Why should newer members show any sort of respect for those who consistently spam and write useless threads? Respect must be earned by your ACTIONS, not simply your post count. True.

 

@ngelMoney feels that he/she is hella hardcore simply because he/she has ~3k posts, when in actuality I have more than likely made more meaningful posts in the 63 posts I myself have made than all the posts he/she has made. Hey, it's sleepy's brother!...

 

Moreover, I would love for you to find for me a post created by @ngelMoney that is longer than any post I have ever written on this account. If you can, compare it to any post I have ever written as JerryFreelance (clearly, fan-fics and the like would not count). Did I mention double accounter?

 

Also' date=' rating someone's cards and slapping them in the face because thy went against something you believe is total immaturaty, so don't even get me started about what is mature and what isn't.

[/quote']

 

The only thing is I'm not "slapping him/her in the face" simply because they went against something I believe in. The cards are that bad. I was merely pointing out a fault in his/her character that it would do him/her a great service to correct. You did it in one of the nastiest ways possible. You could at least not sound like you were picking a fight.

 

If you would like me to give a full individual rating, I can do so:

 

FrostByte: The fact that you need five monsters on the field to summon it automatically brings it down to 1/10. Adding on top of that that the four unspecified monsters have to add up to exactly 10 stars brings it down to a 0.5/10, especially considering the average level at this point of each required monster not named the required Building Block is 2.5, it's damn near impossible to get this card out. Crappy art and a mediocre effect bring it down to a 0/10. At least it's immune to the spells and traps that would rape it before the five turns it needs to activate its effect... Because of this, and since I'm feeling generous, the overall rating for this card is a 0.1/10

 

Blizzard Blitz: Lack of ANY originality whatsoever, combined with brokenness gives it an automatic 0/10

 

Bopsicle: First of all, there's no such thing as a Frozen Pizza. Write out its complete name. Deck is capitalized, and the next part of the sentence makes no sense. I'm done reading it. 0/10 because the effect makes no sense.

 

Building Block: No originality. 4/10 simply because Spirit Reaper rapes.

 

Need I continue? If I did, there's a good chance I would amend my previous rating and lower it, so I highly doubt you want me to continue.

 

This should be more than enough to back up my previous post.

 

That's less than enough.

 

You're scoring him lower than what is probably fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...