thomas carpenter Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 evil dragonlevel 103000atk 3000defno other dragon monsters cant be summoned Link to comment
Valkyrie Lupia Blitzer Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 This is just silly. What's its Attribute? Type? Why doesn't it have a beneficial effect to balance out its negative effect? -1 for having 3000 ATK and DEF (which is WAY too common), -1 for using Level 10 (also too common), -1 for not having an Attribute, -1 for not having a Type, -1 for not clarifying if it is a Synchro, Fusion, Ritual, etc., -1 for having a silly effect, and -1 for having a generically stupid and stupidly generic name. Total...3/10. I think that's a bit too high for this card. EDIT: Nevermind 3/10, you get -0.5 for having a double negative, and -1 for having incorrect OCG. Actual total...1.5/10. EDIT2: You suck for rating your own thread 5/5. Link to comment
Bringerofcake Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 In his defense, 3000 DEF isn't used often. 3000 ATK, though... http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/3000_ATK_Monster_Cards Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted July 19, 2009 Report Share Posted July 19, 2009 This is just silly. What's its Attribute? Type? Why doesn't it have a beneficial effect to balance out its negative effect? -1 for having 3000 ATK and DEF (which is WAY too common)' date=' -1 for using Level 10 (also too common), -1 for not having an Attribute, -1 for not having a Type, -1 for not clarifying if it is a Synchro, Fusion, Ritual, etc., -1 for having a silly effect, and -1 for having a generically stupid and stupidly generic name. Total...3/10. I think that's a bit too high for this card. EDIT: Nevermind 3/10, you get -0.5 for having a double negative, and -1 for having incorrect OCG. Actual total...1.5/10. EDIT2: You suck for rating your own thread 5/5.[/quote'] There's rating, and then there's being a f**king prick. You're straying close to that border. Those things do need specifications though, and the effect makes no sense. "Other Dragon-type monsters can't not be Summoned." That's basically what it says. That means you're forcing the person to play and Dragons they have. But, I'm not trying to be rude. Fill in the rest of the info and I'll rate. Link to comment
vamp6x6x6x Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 evil dragonlevel 103000atk 3000defno other dragon monsters cant be summoned ok sorry to say but the way it reads now "no other dragon monsters cant be summoned" its saying that all dragon monsters can be summoned, and since it is saying that does it mean that in that one turn everyone can summon all the dragon monsters they have ignoring the rules of the game altogether, or does it mean that dragon monsters can continue to be played throughout the game like normal? Link to comment
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Where's it's Attribute? I'm just gonna assume that your monster is a Dragon-Type. Anyway, 5/10 because effect is OP'ed IMO. Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Where's it's Attribute? I'm just gonna assume that your monster is a Dragon-Type. Anyway' date=' 5/10 because effect is OP'ed IMO.[/quote'] How is it's effect OPed when it doesn't have any interpretation or meaning? Link to comment
vamp6x6x6x Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Where's it's Attribute? I'm just gonna assume that your monster is a Dragon-Type. Anyway' date=' 5/10 because effect is OP'ed IMO.[/quote'] How is it's effect OPed when it doesn't have any interpretation or meaning? I finally figured it out. It is a joke card meant to have us wondering. Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Where's it's Attribute? I'm just gonna assume that your monster is a Dragon-Type. Anyway' date=' 5/10 because effect is OP'ed IMO.[/quote'] How is it's effect OPed when it doesn't have any interpretation or meaning? I finally figured it out. It is a joke card meant to have us wondering. Then it's in the wrong section. Link to comment
vamp6x6x6x Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Where's it's Attribute? I'm just gonna assume that your monster is a Dragon-Type. Anyway' date=' 5/10 because effect is OP'ed IMO.[/quote'] How is it's effect OPed when it doesn't have any interpretation or meaning? I finally figured it out. It is a joke card meant to have us wondering. Then it's in the wrong section. He probably didnt know. Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Where's it's Attribute? I'm just gonna assume that your monster is a Dragon-Type. Anyway' date=' 5/10 because effect is OP'ed IMO.[/quote'] How is it's effect OPed when it doesn't have any interpretation or meaning? I finally figured it out. It is a joke card meant to have us wondering. Then it's in the wrong section. He probably didnt know. Well he'll certainly know for next time, won't he? Link to comment
vamp6x6x6x Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Where's it's Attribute? I'm just gonna assume that your monster is a Dragon-Type. Anyway' date=' 5/10 because effect is OP'ed IMO.[/quote'] How is it's effect OPed when it doesn't have any interpretation or meaning? I finally figured it out. It is a joke card meant to have us wondering. Then it's in the wrong section. He probably didnt know. Well he'll certainly know for next time, won't he? lol, yep thats for sure. Link to comment
玄魔の王 Posted July 20, 2009 Report Share Posted July 20, 2009 Where's it's Attribute? I'm just gonna assume that your monster is a Dragon-Type. Anyway' date=' 5/10 because effect is OP'ed IMO.[/quote'] How is it's effect OPed when it doesn't have any interpretation or meaning? I finally figured it out. It is a joke card meant to have us wondering. Then it's in the wrong section. He probably didnt know. Well he'll certainly know for next time, won't he? lol, yep thats for sure. Provided he ever actually checks back on his reviews, anyway. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.