Archelaus Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 RULES:Winner gets 3 REPsLoser gets 1 REPBoth Card Makers will make a Level 7 Synchro Monster. When Voting, you must state why you voted that card.First to 6 votes win. My Card:1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monstersWhen this card is Synchro Summoned, you can destroy 3 cards you control then you can Special Summon 1 monster from your hand. Once per turn, during your opponent's Battle Phase, you can pay 1000 Life Points. If you do, your opponent cannot attack until the End Phase. When this card is destroyed by battle, you can destroy 2 cards you control and Special Summon this card. His Card:1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monstersWhen this card is Synchro Summoned, change it to Defense Position. During your End Phase, if your opponent controls a "Lava Golem", inflict damage to your opponent equal to half of this card's DEF. If "Lava Golem" is removed from the field, increase the ATK of this card by 3000. START VOTING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Come on people <. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 I can't miss this, I just can't. Xander Royce GMV, although I don't understand the last part of the effect, is its ATK 3000 for the rest of the duel then? Or what? Either way, Xander GMV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Xander Royce GMV' date=' although I don't understand the last part of the effect, is its ATK 3000 for the rest of the duel then? Or what? Either way, Xander GMV.[/quote'] The ATK gain is permanent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Yeah, thought so. EDIT: *facedesk* I read it wrongly. I didn't see it was Lava Golem, I thought it was your Crimson Lava Golem xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Lez Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 tyler ex:Pic: 9/10Effect : Compared to your other card's kind of uninspired...But goodOCG: allright... Xander Royce:Pic: 9.5/10Effect:: This card is a good Defense, even if you have no Lava Golem...But a great support if you have 1!OCG: Allright... Quite tough...But i'll go with Xander Royce, ..i just like the effect more.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Lawless Posted October 3, 2009 Report Share Posted October 3, 2009 Royce's makes more sense, it makes lava golem way more playable.I'm not sure I really get part of the other one, you destroy 3 cards you control to specialsummon 1 monster from your hand? the recursion effect is ok, T-Roar effect is awesome, butthe other card is just better, all-around. tl;dr royce Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted October 6, 2009 Report Share Posted October 6, 2009 Freeeeeeeeeeeeeck, more votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Reborn~ Posted October 8, 2009 Report Share Posted October 8, 2009 vote royce for having a better effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 People, just vote already so we could get this over with -_- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 I vote Archelaus b/c the effect seems more balanced to me and it's not focused on a single card. Plus, the picture isn't overused and works for the card :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 I vote Archelaus b/c the effect seems more understandable to me and it's not focused on a single card. So how is my card "not understandable"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Flyer - Sakura Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 Oops, sorry. I meant to say that his was more balanced IMO. But it was a pretty close call between both of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.