Guest Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 Where d'ya think he belongs on ZA BANLIST? Three? Zero? Two? One? Sixty? Negative one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exyst Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 inb4faggotsaysover9000 Personally, I think 0. This, like most/all synchro cards is a 3/0. If it's Limited, it doesn't really matter as it's always available. I'm missing something. I'm sure I am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 OVAR 900 At 0 is where he belongs, because he is a synchro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 Based on the reasoning posted thus far, it appears that he is banworthy because he is a Synchro Monster. ...ban Gaia Knight the Force of Earth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 0.He ruined the format ;( The real question is: "Why the funk did Konami decide to put him at 3?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 The real question is: "Why the f*** did Konami decide to put him at 3?" Wasn't he like, limited? Or is that only on in the OCG? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 The real question is: "Why the f*** did Konami decide to put him at 3?" Wasn't he like' date=' limited? Or is that only on in the OCG?[/quote'] He is unlimited in the TCG. And for the reasoning:A card that almost always is summoned without wasting advantage and can clear the field while also dumping Mezuki/Vayu/Sirocco in the grave is definitely banworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson General Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 banned, so I can get one for cheaps. naw, he is a serous problem, but it wouldnt bug me if he was unbanned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 Sixty? Of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 The real question is: "Why the f*** did Konami decide to put him at 3?" Wasn't he like' date=' limited? Or is that only on in the OCG?[/quote'] He is unlimited in the TCG. And for the reasoning:A card that almost always is summoned without wasting advantage and can clear the field while also dumping Mezuki/Vayu/Sirocco in the grave is definitely banworthy. The reason he's Unlimited is because the banlist is only changed twice a year. We need to wait till March for Brionac to hit a surefire limit. I think Brionac is fine at 1. If it gives any hint, they limited him in the WC2009 version of the September Banlist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 Based on the reasoning posted thus far' date=' it appears that he is banworthy because he is a Synchro Monster. ...ban Gaia Knight the Force of Earth?[/quote'] Yes, I think all Synchro Monsters should be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:pyramid:. Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 huge part of diva zombies cheap win condition. takes no real skill to coltrol the field with. easy 0 on the banlist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dad Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 0. He promotes too many OTKs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 0. Makes it much to easy to clear the field an go for an OTK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anacondas1 Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 O while I don't have it, 3 while I do XD Seriously, I agree with other people saying just semi/limiting it won't help It needs to be banned/unbanned. However I am not to sure which one I would go for.... Anacondas1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 Whenever he's summoned, a win usually follows. 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 24, 2009 Report Share Posted November 24, 2009 Bah, apparently YCM has either gotten smarter or found better people to parrot in my absence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.