CrabHelmet Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 It's not meta I'm stnding up for' date=' it's archetype.[/quote'] Absurd. If a card or deck is a problem or bad for the game, then it shouldn't remain just because it supports an archetype. Better one archetype lose a helpful card than the game be destroyed. I agree with that. Why should only 1 archtype prevail and ruin the game, forcing people to run only 1 archtype just to win? It's not even just about one archetype prevailing; it's about the state of the game in general. If we have three decktypes each controlling the meta, and each is a mindless sackfest, then the game is ruined even though nobody is "forced" to run any one specific deck and regardless of whether those decks are archetype decks or some other sort of combo decks or even 40goodcard.deks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 Still, it feels like that the only way to win is to join them. I rarely see any anti-meta decks used anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 It's not meta I'm stnding up for' date=' it's archetype.[/quote'] So when the Chaos Deck of years past was winning tournaments, you'd standby and allow the Envoys to wreck games? List an Envoy Archetype deck for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 It's not meta I'm stnding up for' date=' it's archetype.[/quote'] So when the Chaos Deck of years past was winning tournaments, you'd standby and allow the Envoys to wreck games? List an Envoy Archetype deck for me. inb4 there isn't one and ~ Fraz ~ is right (which he is). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blakie Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Whirlwind is good where it is, it doesn't have to change at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Whirlwind is good where it is' date=' it doesn't have to change at all.[/quote'] No. I run BW and even I think it shouldn't be unlimited. It should be Semi-ed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Without Black Whirlwind' date=' the whole Blackwing archetype can barely function[/quote'] Then it wouldn't deserve to "function". ^_____^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 3 of theese sirroco and gale and heavystorm = good OTK hand But no, not banned.Limited, yes, but banned is too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 I wouldn't mind the Gadget-like effect so much if most BWs couldn't SS themselves. I'd say ban it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T. Sankara Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 Whirlwind is good where it is' date=' it doesn't have to change at all.[/quote'] That's because you suck at this. ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jericho Posted November 30, 2009 Report Share Posted November 30, 2009 I wouldn't mind the Gadget-like effect so much if most BWs couldn't SS themselves. I'd say ban it. >If most of the BWs couldn't SS themselves. So Gale and Bora are most of the Blackwings now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted December 1, 2009 Report Share Posted December 1, 2009 They're pretty much the win conditions at least. Most games I win are because of Sirrocco > shura > big pierce attack plays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.