BulletMan Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Reinforcements of the Army. Lets see YCM's opinion on where this should be on the ban list. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 I thought this topic would be about Reinforcements. On-topic: Three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Ban/Limit Malicious and put this at 3. Until then it should stay at one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Black Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 dunno. gives you a warrior instantly. most of the notable warriors this card could give you are ban worthy themselves, so i don't know what to do with this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Ban/Limit Malicious and put this at 3. Until then it should stay at one. WTF does Malicious have to do with this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Ban/Limit Malicious and put this at 3. Until then it should stay at one. WTF does Malicious have to do with this? Stratos and Grepher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technicolour Genocide Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Three. I don't see anything broken about it. I don't even understand why it was limited in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Three. I don't see anything broken about it. I don't even understand why it was limited in the first place. This! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 Ban/Limit Malicious and put this at 3. Until then it should stay at one. WTF does Malicious have to do with this? Stratos and Grepher. WTF does Stratos and Grepher have to do with Reinforcements of the Army, other then they can be searched by it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 I thought this topic would be about Reinforcements. On-topic: Three. That card sucks so hard... On-topic: 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 [Rota should be:]Add one LV4 or lower non-Darn, non-Light Warrior from your Deck to your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 [Rota should be:]Add one LV4 or lower non-Darn' date=' non-Light Warrior from your Deck to your hand.[/quote'] Even so, should be at 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cypress Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 [Rota should be:]Add one LV4 or lower EARTH Warrior from your Deck to your hand. Even so' date=' should be at 1.[/quote'] this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 [Rota should be:]Add one LV4 or lower non-Darn' date=' non-Light Warrior from your Deck to your hand.[/quote'] Even so, should be at 1. Why not zero? And why not 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 It should be at 3, and anyone who says otherwise is smelly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mindscatter Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 DUDE. Why?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technicolour Genocide Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 DUDE. Why?! Why not? RotA is a completely fair one-for-one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 This + SpellStriker = Free Monarch. This card on its own is fair, but the warriors you can grab aren't.I like it at 2, just to be different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 This + SpellStriker = Free Monarch. This card on its own is fair' date=' but the warriors you can grab aren't.I like it at 2, just to be different.[/quote'] And I bet you think people played 3 Cydra in PCM format for the same reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 It should be at 3' date=' and anyone who says otherwise is smelly.[/quote']Best. Logic. Ever. This + SpellStriker = Easier Synchro SummonFixed* My IRL Synchro deck runs Spell Striker in 3s, along with 3 Junk Synchrons. So running Shnitzel in 3s would be quite lulzy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 This + SpellStriker = Free Monarch. Didn't we have a topic a while ago about cards being "free"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted December 26, 2009 Report Share Posted December 26, 2009 This + SpellStriker = Free Monarch. Didn't we have a topic a while ago about cards being "free"? You forgot the ruling on SpellStriker that says if it and Reinforcements are in your back pocket, you can Normal Summon a Monarch from your back pocket, which makes it an almost valid statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 It is my firmly-held belief that the authorities responsible for constructing the Forbidden and Limited list for this trading card game should take it upon themselves to prohibit the use of Crystal Beasts. The main argument in support of this belief is that the deck in question is superior to the vast majority of other decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Three. I don't see anything broken about it. I don't even understand why it was limited in the first place. This! TeleDAD had 3 ROTAs no matter what, to search for D-Draw/Allure targets. Or for Grepher, which dumped Malicious which in turn made the Synchro engine. That's why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Three. I don't see anything broken about it. I don't even understand why it was limited in the first place. This! TeleDAD had 3 ROTAs no matter what' date=' to search for D-Draw/Allure targets. Or for Grepher, which dumped Malicious which in turn made the Synchro engine. That's why.[/quote'] I sincerely hope that you are merely outlining Konami's motives and not suggesting that they actually make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.