Azuh Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 3 Destroyed way to many decktypes when it was Limited It is my firmly-held belief that the authorities responsible for constructing the Forbidden and Limited list for this trading card game should take it upon themselves to prohibit the use of Crystal Beasts. The main argument in support of this belief is that the deck in question is superior to the vast majority of other decks. If this was Facebook, I would "like" this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 3 Destroyed way to many decktypes when it was Limited It is my firmly-held belief that the authorities responsible for constructing the Forbidden and Limited list for this trading card game should take it upon themselves to prohibit the use of Crystal Beasts. The main argument in support of this belief is that the deck in question is superior to the vast majority of other decks. If this was Facebook' date=' I would "like" this[/quote'] Someone find me the original quote. I lost it when I redid my sig a while back. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Three. I don't see anything broken about it. I don't even understand why it was limited in the first place. This! TeleDAD had 3 ROTAs no matter what' date=' to search for D-Draw/Allure targets. Or for Grepher, which dumped Malicious which in turn made the Synchro engine. That's why.[/quote'] I sincerely hope that you are merely outlining Konami's motives and not suggesting that they actually make sense. Of course. I'd honestly love ROTA at 3 because Warrior Toolbox is just fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 3 Destroyed way to many decktypes when it was Limited It is my firmly-held belief that the authorities responsible for constructing the Forbidden and Limited list for this trading card game should take it upon themselves to prohibit the use of Crystal Beasts. The main argument in support of this belief is that the deck in question is superior to the vast majority of other decks. If this was Facebook' date=' I would "like" this[/quote'] Someone find me the original quote. I lost it when I redid my sig a while back. :( http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-41009-post-619319.html#pid619319 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Here at YCM, we remember terrible posts from over eighteen months ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Here at YCM' date=' we remember terrible posts from over eighteen months ago.[/quote'] That's our selling point! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 ITT: We make Hikaru happy with the best quote ever to be posted on YCM. <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rose Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 3 Destroyed way to many decktypes when it was Limited It is my firmly-held belief that the authorities responsible for constructing the Forbidden and Limited list for this trading card game should take it upon themselves to prohibit the use of Crystal Beasts. The main argument in support of this belief is that the deck in question is superior to the vast majority of other decks. If this was Facebook' date=' I would "like" this[/quote'] Someone find me the original quote. I lost it when I redid my sig a while back. :( http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/thread-41009-post-619319.html#pid619319 I can't stop laughting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Back at three, no reason for all decks that can use a just generally useful card like this to suffer because Dark Grepher was ridiculously designed <_ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Limit Dark Grepher and then Unlimit Rota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Why should Dark Grepher be limited? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Limit Dark Grepher and then Unlimit Rota. Limiting Dark Grepher does nothing, one of him is all that most decks that use him usually use anyway. That and there really is no purpose to multiple of him as one of him accomplishes all you'll need him for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 He's a auto DAD right? Rota > Dark Grepher > DAD > Monster Reincarnation > Use DAD's effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 He's a auto DAD right? Rota > Dark Grepher > DAD > Monster Reincarnation > Use DAD's effect And this aforementioned Dark Armed Dragon abuse is almost certainly the fault of Dark Grepher and definitely not at all the fault of Dark Armed Dragon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 He's a auto DAD right? Rota > Dark Grepher > DAD > Monster Reincarnation > Use DAD's effect And this aforementioned Dark Armed Dragon abuse is almost certainly the fault of Dark Grepher and definitely not at all the fault of Dark Armed Dragon. Well in all honesty, Dark Grepher was sorta designed with DAD in mind...not saying that I disagree with you but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee Black Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 so dark grepher's the problem? when DAD gets banned, limiting it won't do much. what other notable warriors besides grepher and some e-heroes would this card get? marauding captain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 The whole Six Sam archtype is plausible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 He's a auto DAD right? Rota > Dark Grepher > DAD > Monster Reincarnation > Use DAD's effect And this aforementioned Dark Armed Dragon abuse is almost certainly the fault of Dark Grepher and definitely not at all the fault of Dark Armed Dragon. Well in all honesty' date=' Dark Grepher was sorta designed with DAD in mind...not saying that I disagree with you but...[/quote'] But what? Your whole argument's based on the grounds that banning DAD isn't a given. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Leo Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 This at three is good. Could be used heavily in D-Heroes though :] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 He's a auto DAD right? Rota > Dark Grepher > DAD > Monster Reincarnation > Use DAD's effect And this aforementioned Dark Armed Dragon abuse is almost certainly the fault of Dark Grepher and definitely not at all the fault of Dark Armed Dragon. Well in all honesty' date=' Dark Grepher was sorta designed with DAD in mind...not saying that I disagree with you but...[/quote'] But what? Your whole argument's based on the grounds that banning DAD isn't a given. Why would banning dad be a given? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 ^ If you honestly have to ask you have no real business being in a serious ban list conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 Explain why you think DAD needs to be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted December 27, 2009 Report Share Posted December 27, 2009 To make such a demand would have us infer that you have no real business being in a serious ban list conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Banning Grepher because it combos well with DAD is sort of like banning Metamorphosis because it combos well with Thousand-Eyes Restrict: absolutely idiotic. Explain why you think DAD needs to be banned. You would not have DAD at 3' date=' would you? Just because Limiting DAD causes [i']fewer[/i] games to degenerate into "1/3 LP beatstick pops out of nowhere and nukes everything for free DERP DERP" does not mean that DAD has ceased to hurt the game upon being Limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted December 28, 2009 Report Share Posted December 28, 2009 Explain why you think DAD needs to be banned. If you're honestly asking this, you're either: a) An idiot, and therefore I won't waste my time bothering on something you'll never understand anyway.b) A troll, who will continue to play the "lol, I don't understand" shtick until they tire of it. In either case, I'm not answering your question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.