Yata should be legal again

[-Griffin]

"Elec" Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Thunder-Type monster.

This card can attack your opponent directly. If this card inflicts Battle Damage to your opponent's Life Points by attacking directly, your opponent randomly returns 1 card in their hand to the Deck.

 

At least Yata wasn't Honestable, Summon-able from your Extra Deck at any point, returned to your hand and didn't attack directly. If your opponent even has 1 dead monster in their hand that they can't Summon, this is a better Yata.

Might Elecanimals be playing Guardian of Order and Exchange to make this a true Yata-lock?

[Psycho Shocker Android]

"Elec" Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Thunder-Type monster.

This card can attack your opponent directly. If this card inflicts Battle Damage to your opponent's Life Points by attacking directly' date=' your opponent randomly returns 1 card in their hand to the Deck.

 

At least Yata wasn't Honestable, Summon-able from your Extra Deck at any point, returned to your hand and didn't attack directly. If your opponent even has 1 dead monster in their hand that they can't Summon, [b']this is a better Yata.[/b]

Might Elecanimals be playing Guardian of Order and Exchange to make this a true Yata-lock?

 

NO

[-Griffin]

Oh, fine, it was a joke since they'll escape it 90% of the time.

Can we at least discuss the card?

[RyanAtlus]

No.

This is completely different.

Yata is bannable, this...is laughable.

[-Griffin]

No.

This is completely different.

Yata is bannable' date=' this...is laughable.

[/quote']

Oh' date=' fine, it was a joke since they'll escape it 90% of the time.

Can we at least discuss the card?

[/quote']

 

YCM should have rule that people need to read a thread before posting, especially when it's 3 posts long.

And this card is still fairly decent with Honest and Beckoning making its low ATK less of a problem =/

[Psycho Shocker Android]

No.

This is completely different.

Yata is bannable' date=' this...is laughable.

[/quote']

Oh' date=' fine, it was a joke since they'll escape it 90% of the time.

Can we at least discuss the card?

[/quote']

 

YCM should have rule that people need to read a thread before posting, especially when it's 3 posts long.

And this card is still fairly decent with Honest and Beckoning making its low ATK less of a problem =/

 

The atk isn't the only problem.

 

"Elec" Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Thunder-Type monster.

 

It's almost impossible to bring that out.

[-Griffin]

No.

This is completely different.

Yata is bannable' date=' this...is laughable.

[/quote']

Oh' date=' fine, it was a joke since they'll escape it 90% of the time.

Can we at least discuss the card?

[/quote']

 

YCM should have rule that people need to read a thread before posting, especially when it's 3 posts long.

And this card is still fairly decent with Honest and Beckoning making its low ATK less of a problem =/

 

The atk isn't the only problem.

 

"Elec" Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Thunder-Type monster.

 

It's almost impossible to bring that out.

 

ITT: Cards are useless if they aren't usable in every Deck.

There are 2 level 2 Elec Tuners and 2 level 4 Elecs. All are Shining Angel targets, and most Limit Reverse targets.

Is it really that impossible? =/

[Psycho Shocker Android]

No.

This is completely different.

Yata is bannable' date=' this...is laughable.

[/quote']

Oh' date=' fine, it was a joke since they'll escape it 90% of the time.

Can we at least discuss the card?

[/quote']

 

YCM should have rule that people need to read a thread before posting, especially when it's 3 posts long.

And this card is still fairly decent with Honest and Beckoning making its low ATK less of a problem =/

 

The atk isn't the only problem.

 

"Elec" Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Thunder-Type monster.

 

It's almost impossible to bring that out.

 

ITT: Cards are useless if they aren't usable in every Deck.

There are 2 level 2 Elec Tuners and 2 level 4 Elecs. All are Shining Angel targets, and most Limit Reverse targets.

Is it really that impossible? =/

 

Ok maybe for fun duels. The thing is, I want competitive/playable stuff in my boosters, not another reptilian archetype.

[-Griffin]

Ah. I play at a less competitive level, just for fun. Since I can't go to any tournies IRL, there's nothing to gain by only playing top-level Decks, so things like these are still awesome to me :3

[darkwolf777]

Tourney and Casual players just somehow have to stay separated. I can't really tell them to have fun differently than I do, and I can't really have fun playing them if they wont switch from using their tired Lightsworn or Blackwing deck since it's all they would want to use x.o Its like this for almost every game that has a tourney scene, so its really pointless to get into or argue about ><

 

At least for these topics, try to be open minded when talking about these cards and just consider what they can do for decks, not what they can't do for your competitive deck.

 

I do agree, its summoning requirements are rather specific, so consider if its useful for a "Thunder" or "Elec" deck, whether or not "Thunder/Elec" decks are competitive or not.

[-Lightray Daedalus-]

No.

This is completely different.

Yata is bannable' date=' this...is laughable.

[/quote']

Oh' date=' fine, it was a joke since they'll escape it 90% of the time.

Can we at least discuss the card?

[/quote']

 

YCM should have rule that people need to read a thread before posting, especially when it's 3 posts long.

And this card is still fairly decent with Honest and Beckoning making its low ATK less of a problem =/

 

The atk isn't the only problem.

 

"Elec" Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Thunder-Type monster.

 

It's almost impossible to bring that out.

 

ITT: Cards are useless if they aren't usable in every Deck.

There are 2 level 2 Elec Tuners and 2 level 4 Elecs. All are Shining Angel targets, and most Limit Reverse targets.

Is it really that impossible? =/

 

Ok maybe for fun duels. The thing is, I want competitive/playable stuff in my boosters, not another reptilian archetype.

 

Go jump off a Cliff, smash your head and try to bleed enourmous amounts of blood so my happy dance can be more happy can you????

 

Meta jerk

 

OT: The card hasn't got a bad effect...I think it is balanced when you think about it and it got support from lots of cards....But Yata Lock was easier to keep going this can be like Skipped in the time to times....

[Great Unclean One: VK]

It's balanced. Great and summonable since the ele archtype also recieves the thunder support.

 

Also, not to mention this can be made into his former glory.

 

Also, This is Yata reincarnated, but his former vessel shall not be unbanned.

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

Yata is Yata, this is similar but its NOT Yata.

 

this might work funny in Batterymen. it could make for an interesting deck type though.

[Toffee.]

"Elec" Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner Thunder-Type monster.

 

It's almost impossible to bring that out.

Not really.

Elecgoldfish is a level 2 Tuner, and something like Thunder King Rai-Oh is a level 4 Thunder monster.

[-Griffin]

I can't stop thinking of awesome fun Decks with these things, like running Twin Swords for a double discard from Goldfish or a double draw-skip from Chimera, and the ATK drop wouldn't matter because of Honest... Or maybe a variant that searched Honest more reliably by using Sangan and Summoner Monk... I think I have found my archtype for a while.

[Crimson General]

It does look pretty BA. I like it.

 

 

definantly nowhere near Yata though.

[-Lightray Daedalus-]

I can't stop thinking of awesome fun Decks with these things' date=' like running Twin Swords for a double discard from Goldfish or a double draw-skip from Chimera, and the ATK drop wouldn't matter because of Honest... Or maybe a variant that searched Honest more reliably by using Sangan and Summoner Monk... I think I have found my archtype for a while.

[/quote']

 

Solid-Batteryelects

 

We only got to find a way to keep Honest out of the Grave Quickly

[-Griffin]

I can't stop thinking of awesome fun Decks with these things' date=' like running Twin Swords for a double discard from Goldfish or a double draw-skip from Chimera, and the ATK drop wouldn't matter because of Honest... Or maybe a variant that searched Honest more reliably by using Sangan and Summoner Monk... I think I have found my archtype for a while.

[/quote']

 

Solid-Batteryelects

 

We only got to find a way to keep Honest out of the Grave Quickly

 

I also love the idea of Elecs with GoO and Exchange, to make this card actually work like Yata =3

 

And about removing Honest... Tough... Beckoning and PoA are all that come to mind.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

Because Beckoning would be so bad in a deck of all LIGHT monsters :S

 

This is a good card, but a bit underpowered. With the double ATK you would get a lot more advantage; however, the second the person starts top-decking, unless it's a lvl 6 or higher monster and they happen to have no field, they'll just set it.

[-Griffin]

Because Beckoning would be so bad in a deck of all LIGHT monsters :S

 

Because Beckoning is the perfect way to get rid of the Honests for Solidarity. I'd prefer a way to RFG them =/

 

This is a good card' date=' but a bit underpowered. With the double ATK you would get a lot more advantage; however, the second the person starts top-decking, unless it's a lvl 6 or higher monster and they happen to have no field, they'll just set it.

[/quote']

 

You've forced them to play every card they have and lose their hand.

You haven't locked permanently, but you sure got a positive effect from it =/ It isn't "I win", it's just damn close.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

I get that, but this seems to be getting the hype the X-Saber loop did.

[-Griffin]

I get that' date=' but this seems to be getting the hype the X-Saber loop did.

[/quote']

 

I'm not claiming it'll impact any tourny, I'm just saying that it's bloody awesome in the Deck it was designed for.

 

Now, what do people think of this/ElecGF with Twin Swords?

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

Why would you run Solidarity in a Batterymanz fuse?

---

The double attack on Elechimera is good, 'nuff said.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

I'm not claiming it'll impact any tourny' date=' I'm just saying that it's bloody awesome [i']in the Deck it was designed for[/i].

 

But Yata is bloody awesome just randomly being splashed into decent decks.

 

Secondly, why would this be an excuse to legalize Yata? Don't opponents/fans of Heavy Storm use exactly the same logic to support Heavy Storm being legal for now?

 

"Heavy Storm is a necessary evil to punish overextension, at least until a more stable less abusable version of it comes up, then it can be banned."

"We now have a more stable less abusable version of Yata Grasu, therefore we can now unban Yata Garasu."

 

The same logic shouldn't work to support two completely different ideologies. >_>

[Fraz]

Depending on translation it could become a bit better, because what I'm seeing is a monster that makes you add a card in hand to the deck, but doesn't specify where in the deck it goes. Because of this it would be shuffled into the deck so it's possible you put back a dead card and I drew a smashing ground.