~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 WE'RE DEPLETING TCG'S GOLDEN REPUTATION AND DESTROYING THE SEARCH FUNCTION IT'S TERRIBLE. STOP HORRIBLE UNFUNNY TITLES, ALL THEY DO IS CONTRIBUTE TO TCG'S DISARRAY. So, about Torrential. Its already established that there's hardly any case to bring to trying to promote its being a good card, we already know this. Obviously. If you want to talk balance, go ahead. Feel free to keep up the "HRMMMM MAYBE SEMI?" and "I THINK IT'S GOOD WHERE IT IS" comments. Another issue Torrential brings to the table is Starlight Road. Torrential may actually not necessarily be the sure staple it once was, whether this is indeed the case or whether I'm just bullshitting while trying to conjure up more guises to create an air of legitimacy here is totally irrelevant. Have you had to restrict your card choices as a result of Starlight Road? Not just Torrential, but various other cards in general? What cards have lost their magic for you? Share your stories! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabber2033 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 "I THINK IT'S GOOD WHERE IT IS" ^^^This. 1 is perfect. Too much destructive power with too little a cost. Sure, it destroys your own monsters as well, but most players are wise enough to play it only when they have no monsters or when their opponent fills their monster field within a turn or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 25, 2010 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 HRRRRRRRRRM. I dunno bro, I'm still convinced it should be semi'd. Sure it's destructive, but if you lose any card advantage whatsoever to field nukes ever you're probably terrible at the game so jyah bro. Shouldn't be unlimited because then there would be a FEW too many, 2 IS JUST PERFECT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Polaris is brilliant at thread names <3 And this @2 seems weird IMO. Though this card does seem to appear way too obveiously, and can be easily avoided.Jinzo, for example, says hi.(lolpeoplerunjinzo) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 ITS AN OCCASIONAL +4 SO IT MUST BE GOOD. Decent where it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luis2 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Why put this card at 2? Keep it at one. The CPUs in WC 2009 can get this card at the right time. Now imagine all of them using two of this card or people on wifi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Flame Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 It is simply too strong if used correctly. It is good where its at Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 well, if this goes to 2, then heavy should go to 2 so i can get rid of it. its fine as is. it punished overextension and is lol funny when you destroy your own sangan and 2 of your opponent's monsters with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 my friend here makes this card tech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luis2 Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Jade Knight laughs at Torrential Tribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted March 25, 2010 Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 Staple that should stay where it is. I don't see why this shouldn't be run in every deck, asside a few ofc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.