byak Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 *gets shot* Discuss. I run this @0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 I love how something this good isn't being used. I just don't get it. I for one do use it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Borg Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 Its a rather good card, if only there were more gb decks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wizarus Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 I love how something this good isn't being used. I just don't get it. I for one do use it. I don't know why people aren't running this card either. It probably isn't needed, but that's like saying JD isn't needed for Lightsworns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 useful, but needs a specific build...i.e Rescue Glads. i run 2 in my build....find its all i need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted April 6, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 I love how something this good isn't being used. I just don't get it. I for one do use it. I don't know why people aren't running this card either. It probably isn't needed' date=' but that's like saying JD isn't needed for Lightsworns.[/quote'] It makes the deck a bit inconsistent, in my opinion.Also, I don't run it because if you were to get a GB out with it, it would result in a +0 (Or -1 for some. Retiari, Laquari, Hoplomus, etc.) instead of a normal +1 which I'm usually aiming for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BehindTheMask Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 It's a good card, but not in this format. GB.dek needs more control over the game state, and Test Tiger is rather useless except for combos. I'd much rather use a 1-4-1 card like D-Prison or Smashing Ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 It's a good card' date=' but not in this format.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted April 6, 2010 Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 It's not needed in GBs. You waste a card having this do something other GBs do for free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraz Posted April 7, 2010 Report Share Posted April 7, 2010 I love how something this good isn't being used. I just don't get it. I for one do use it. I don't know why people aren't running this card either. It probably isn't needed' date=' but that's like saying JD isn't needed for Lightsworns.[/quote'] It makes the deck a bit inconsistent, in my opinion.Also, I don't run it because if you were to get a GB out with it, it would result in a +0 (Or -1 for some. Retiari, Laquari, Hoplomus, etc.) instead of a normal +1 which I'm usually aiming for. It sets up plays with secutor > herk and prisma > gyzarus and also gives more options to get around an opponents' beatstick. Its obv a good card but I would be considering it tech in a GB variant that doesn't aim to do those first 2 combos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted April 7, 2010 Report Share Posted April 7, 2010 I would only run it in prisma glads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flame Dragon Posted April 8, 2010 Report Share Posted April 8, 2010 I love how something this good isn't being used. I just don't get it. I for one do use it. I don't know why people aren't running this card either. It probably isn't needed' date=' but that's like saying JD isn't needed for Lightsworns.[/quote'] It makes the deck a bit inconsistent, in my opinion.Also, I don't run it because if you were to get a GB out with it, it would result in a +0 (Or -1 for some. Retiari, Laquari, Hoplomus, etc.) instead of a normal +1 which I'm usually aiming for. It sets up plays with secutor > herk and prisma > gyzarus and also gives more options to get around an opponents' beatstick. Its obv a good card but I would be considering it tech in a GB variant that doesn't aim to do those first 2 combos.That is the main reason I like it since if GB can't attack they really can't do anything. Test Tiger helps fix that problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenzoTheHarpist Posted April 8, 2010 Report Share Posted April 8, 2010 If they can't attack that means they funked up somewhere. Modern GBs should have enough control to always get an attack through or at least clear the opponent's beatsticks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted April 9, 2010 Report Share Posted April 9, 2010 No thanks, already took one yesterday.Glads should run this. The number depends on the Decktype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.