http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Solidarity

[Guest PikaPerson01]

 

Hmm... it's attack boost is awfully large, and the cost of a bit of deck dedication isn't too harsh these days...

 

I might be going crazy from lacking of playing this terrible game, but I'm beginning to think it's rather overpowered...

 

YCM's thoughts?

[.Frostpaw]

It's an overpowered card when ran in a type-dedicated deck. I run 3 of this in my Machina deck.

[-Berserker-]

If you run this with a generic Extra Deck, your opponent can use Sucess Rate 0% and kill you...

[Rose]

Overpowered?

It's good, but not Overpowered. Multiple copys of this on the field however, is where this card could be considered kinda "Overpowered" but really it isn't.

Why? It's lolattack. I would also rather run other cards then this most of the time, but IRL i find this card fun to use, cause my friends can't beat lolattack.

 

It's an overpowered card when ran in a type-dedicated deck. I run 3 of this in my Machina deck.

 

Not really.

You don't need this card in Machinas. If your on a budget, yeah it's fine but if your not, no need.

[Zkaiser]

If you run this with a generic Extra Deck' date=' your opponent can use Sucess Rate 0% and kill you...

[/quote']

 

That would mean your opponent runs Success Probability 0%. You win by default.

[.Frostpaw]

If you run this with a generic Extra Deck' date=' your opponent can use [b']Success Probability 0%[/b] and kill you...

 

Fixed.

[Mister Sir]

It's just good support for decks that run 1 Type of monster.

[Guest JoshIcy]

Apparently YCM loves this card...

[Flame Dragon]

One isn't so bad since it's basically a Radion. The problem starts when two or three are used at once.

[C.F.Yuji]

Artwork aside, I like using at least one of this in my Tempest Burn, can turn Tempest into a 3000 6 Star Burn Synchro XD.

[-Lightray Daedalus-]

One isn't so bad since it's basically a Radion. The problem starts when two or three are used at once.

 

Indeed 2400 Reptiless Naga are funz.....

 

I also loved the charming *pun intended* artwork somebody made of this card using the chramers....

 

Card indeed is <3

[Coffee Black]

lolattack

 

lolattack isn't bad. You just need to be a decent player to pull it off.

[C.F.Yuji]

One isn't so bad since it's basically a Radion. The problem starts when two or three are used at once.

 

Indeed 2400 Reptiless Naga are funz.....

 

I also loved the charming *pun intended* artwork somebody made of this card using the chramers....

 

Card indeed is <3

 

lol' date=' Ya mean this?

[img']http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/1849/5415m.jpg[/img]

Much better IMO.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Why? It's lolattack. I would also rather run other cards then this most of the time' date=' but IRL i find this card fun to use, cause my friends can't beat lolattack.[/quote']

 

It may be lolattack but then how do you (specifically you, Rose, not generally speaking) usually end up winning a duel other then by summoning a monster with a high lolattack?

 

I mean, the term "lolattack" is typically used when people think attack is the end all, be all, when it comes to whether or not a card is good. This however, is just an extra cherry on top to a deck some people would probably be running anyway.

[darkwolf777]

I like this card a lot since it caused me to make several solid decks. I like single cards that allow you to set up several decks around it, such as Solidarity (for each type of course :D) and Black Garden (i have a few different decks around this, one of course being a plant deck, another a remove brainwashing deck) for example.

[Canadian]

Konami's answer to "I want the seal of orichalcos!".

[OnSlaUghT]

When I get one of this, it's finding a place in my Six Samurai deck, or maybe my Endymion deck.

[Rose]

Why? It's lolattack. I would also rather run other cards then this most of the time' date=' but IRL i find this card fun to use, cause my friends can't beat lolattack.[/quote']

 

It may be lolattack but then how do you (specifically you, Rose, not generally speaking) usually end up winning a duel other then by summoning a monster with a high lolattack? I use destruction and swarm for the kill, not summoning a monster with just high attack.

 

I mean, the term "lolattack" is typically used when people think attack is the end all, be all, when it comes to whether or not a card is good. This however, is just an extra cherry on top to a deck some people would probably be running anyway. I was then using the term "lolattack" then the wrong kind of way. Think about it in this way, what would you prefer, extra attack or destruction. Would you rather attack a monster, or use a destruction card then attack, for more damage and even if the attack is unsucessful, you still destroyed your opponents monster. No build really needs this, it just is considered to be even better with this, when you could replace it with more consistant cards that are more related to the theme of the deck your using. This card should only be used if you trying to make a fun deck, not a competitive deck. Still a great card though IMO.

[-Griffin]

Why? It's lolattack. I would also rather run other cards then this most of the time' date=' but IRL i find this card fun to use, cause my friends can't beat lolattack.[/quote']

 

It may be lolattack but then how do you (specifically you, Rose, not generally speaking) usually end up winning a duel other then by summoning a monster with a high lolattack? I use destruction and swarm for the kill, not summoning a monster with just high attack.

 

I mean, the term "lolattack" is typically used when people think attack is the end all, be all, when it comes to whether or not a card is good. This however, is just an extra cherry on top to a deck some people would probably be running anyway. I was then using the term "lolattack" then the wrong kind of way. Think about it in this way, what would you prefer, extra attack or destruction. Would you rather attack a monster, or use a destruction card then attack, for more damage and even if the attack is unsucessful, you still destroyed your opponents monster. No build really needs this, it just is considered to be even better with this, when you could replace it with more consistant cards that are more related to the theme of the deck your using. This card should only be used if you trying to make a fun deck, not a competitive deck. Still a great card though IMO.

 

I'd rather have the card that allowed my monsters to kill something you control every turn and practically invalidated your Battle Phase. If you can't remove Solidarity, all monsters become very noticeably more powerful - Kycoo goes from Firedog food to Stardust killer, ect, ect with other examples. It's best backed up with Solemn, Bribe, ect, anything to help it, which is why it's great with Card Guard. It's not 'broken', but it can easily win duels if the Deck would (almost) run only 1 type anyway.

[-Lightray Daedalus-]

Why? It's lolattack. I would also rather run other cards then this most of the time' date=' but IRL i find this card fun to use, cause my friends can't beat lolattack.[/quote']

 

It may be lolattack but then how do you (specifically you, Rose, not generally speaking) usually end up winning a duel other then by summoning a monster with a high lolattack? I use destruction and swarm for the kill, not summoning a monster with just high attack.

 

I mean, the term "lolattack" is typically used when people think attack is the end all, be all, when it comes to whether or not a card is good. This however, is just an extra cherry on top to a deck some people would probably be running anyway. I was then using the term "lolattack" then the wrong kind of way. Think about it in this way, what would you prefer, extra attack or destruction. Would you rather attack a monster, or use a destruction card then attack, for more damage and even if the attack is unsucessful, you still destroyed your opponents monster. No build really needs this, it just is considered to be even better with this, when you could replace it with more consistant cards that are more related to the theme of the deck your using. This card should only be used if you trying to make a fun deck, not a competitive deck. Still a great card though IMO.

 

Well if you think about it having a bunch of destruction effect ALWAYS DEPENDS on your opponent's plays while attacking with monsters is like...The way this game is supposed to work...

[Rose]

Why? It's lolattack. I would also rather run other cards then this most of the time' date=' but IRL i find this card fun to use, cause my friends can't beat lolattack.[/quote']

 

It may be lolattack but then how do you (specifically you, Rose, not generally speaking) usually end up winning a duel other then by summoning a monster with a high lolattack? I use destruction and swarm for the kill, not summoning a monster with just high attack.

 

I mean, the term "lolattack" is typically used when people think attack is the end all, be all, when it comes to whether or not a card is good. This however, is just an extra cherry on top to a deck some people would probably be running anyway. I was then using the term "lolattack" then the wrong kind of way. Think about it in this way, what would you prefer, extra attack or destruction. Would you rather attack a monster, or use a destruction card then attack, for more damage and even if the attack is unsucessful, you still destroyed your opponents monster. No build really needs this, it just is considered to be even better with this, when you could replace it with more consistant cards that are more related to the theme of the deck your using. This card should only be used if you trying to make a fun deck, not a competitive deck. Still a great card though IMO.

 

I'd rather have the card that allowed my monsters to kill something you control every turn and practically invalidated your Battle Phase. If you can't remove Solidarity, all monsters become very noticeably more powerful - Kycoo goes from Firedog food to Stardust killer, ect, ect with other examples. It's best backed up with Solemn, Bribe, ect, anything to help it, which is why it's great with Card Guard. It's not 'broken', but it can easily win duels if the Deck would (almost) run only 1 type anyway.

 

I prefer using more destruction. I guess it's more just me. I already said it's good, i just don't see the point so much running it over other cards. Those things you said are true, but meh, im not good at countering arguments, so what the heck, lets just leave it at that.

[RyanAtlus]

Where were the times we could say:

"A type is not a Deck Type!"

to noobs? Because now, they are.

[-Griffin]

Where were the times we could say:

"A type is not a Deck Type!"

to noobs? Because now' date=' they are.

[/quote']

 

Nope, still not.

"Warrior" isn't a Decktype, Solid Bushi is.

"Dragon" isn't a Decktype, Hopeless is.

"Rock" isn't a Decktype, ROCKSTUN is.

[Coffee Black]

Where were the times we could say:

"A type is not a Deck Type!"

to noobs? Because now' date=' they are.

[/quote']

 

Nope, still not.

"Warrior" isn't a Decktype, Solid Bushi is.

"Dragon" isn't a Decktype, Hopeless is.

"Rock" isn't a Decktype, ROCKSTUN is.

 

When I made a dinosaur deck, Solidarity was my excuse to call it legit. Of course, that was just for fun.

[TheTurtleOnceCalledGod]

(prepares to get shot)

GO GO OJAMA RANGERS!

(gets

)

This card is fun, and you do not need generic synchro monsters to win, you just have to plan your deck properly and this card can make lol attack out of almost anything. Just try Solid Frogs and see what you get (an opponent thinking they no longer deserve to live because they lost to a noob non-meta deck.

This card is great for casual, but usually lolatk does not work in the meta arena.