Cyber Twin Prototype "Scrap Twin Dragon"

[MrCodyPwns]

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Scrap_Twin_Dragon

 

Scraps keep looking better.

 

discuss.

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

brilliant.

i'm liking scraps..

 

ALOT!!

[Toffee.]

Scrap monsters just get more and more amazing by the second <3

[wero-vasto]

It just ask 1 Tuner O: I love it!<3

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

It's sad that it can still be stopped by Stardust... awesome that SLR does crap though :D too bad it requires a "Scrap" tuner, would have been a great target for Debris, but making it generic would be broken.

[White Void]

Next set we get Scrap End Dragon <_<

 

Really though, nice card. Scraps are shaping up to be a really above average archetype if they keep this up, most of their support so far is brilliant and their boss monsters are actually easily summoned within the archetype itself.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

Next set we get Scrap End Dragon <_<

 

Really though' date=' nice card. Scraps are shaping up to be a really above average archetype if they keep this up, most of their support so far is brilliant and their boss monsters are actually easily summoned within the archetype itself.

[/quote']

 

Wait, they are actually making a good archetype and not making it overpowered?! *goes to jump off of a building*

 

But seriously, an archetype based on skill? Sweetness.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Scraps = Crap

 

... But seriously, I am entirely unimpressed. Kind of wish the Synchro was more generic though.

[-Griffin]

Scraps = Crap

 

... But seriously' date=' I am entirely unimpressed. Kind of wish the Synchro was more generic though.

[/quote']

 

A Deck which throws around +3ish moves and has great consistency boosters is now 'crap'.

 

This just doubled the length of the Scrap loop and trebled it's field clearing ability. Great card.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Scraps = Crap

 

... But seriously' date=' I am entirely unimpressed. Kind of wish the Synchro was more generic though.

[/quote']

 

A Deck which throws around +3ish moves and has great consistency boosters is now 'crap'.

 

Eh, I have no clue what you mean by "throws around +3ish moves". Do you mean it has 3 cool combos? Not impressive, for any deck, since they begin with 6 cards. Do you mean they can summon stuff that produces advantage? If so, other then Chimera, I don't see it.

 

And what the hell is a "consistency booster"?

[evilfusion]

Scraps = Crap

 

... But seriously' date=' I am entirely unimpressed. Kind of wish the Synchro was more generic though.

[/quote']

 

Is there anything you DONT think is crap? You have already condemned Infernities and Scraps as overhyped/worthless, and they're so clearly NOT. What DOES impress you?

 

If this thing was MORE generic, it'd be broken, probably worse than Brionac, especially from what I know about how Scraps like destroying themselves. It's like you're purposefully ignorant of an archetype's potential when you look at individual cards.

 

I have to study the Scrap Archetype a little more to see its full potential, but I agree that this is a good card for the Archetype.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

Scrap Dragon only gets the revive effect when he's destroyed by an opponent...

[-Griffin]

It does? They need to update the game I'm playing, then, although I'll happily stick with the broken version.

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Scrap_Dragon

 

Unless the translation is off, it isn't broken.

[Great Unclean One: VK]

Good archtype is good.

 

 

Their are always becoming better and better.

[玄魔の王]

Scraps = Crap

 

... But seriously' date=' I am entirely unimpressed. Kind of wish the Synchro was more generic though.

[/quote']

 

Is there anything you DONT think is crap? You have already condemned Infernities and Scraps as overhyped/worthless, and they're so clearly NOT. What DOES impress you?

 

If this thing was MORE generic, it'd be broken, probably worse than Brionac, especially from what I know about how Scraps like destroying themselves. It's like you're purposefully ignorant of an archetype's potential when you look at individual cards.

 

I have to study the Scrap Archetype a little more to see its full potential, but I agree that this is a good card for the Archetype.

 

I agree. This thing basically allows Scrap to go "Get the F**K out of my way" every turn. Owned.

[Toffee.]

too bad it requires a "Scrap" tuner

Scrap Dragon requires a Scrap Tuner aswell.

 

Scrap Monsters have a level 5 Tuner btw...

[玄魔の王]

too bad it requires a "Scrap" tuner

1) Scrap Dragon requires a Scrap Tuner aswell.

 

2) Scrap Monsters have a level 5 Tuner btw...

 

1) No, it's any Tuner.

 

2) That's right, so really it's fine.

[TheTurtleOnceCalledGod]

Scraps seem like they might gain more consistency, but unfortunately might end up like X-Sabers.

[BulletMan]

Why, the heck, are scraps not all MACHINES? Seriously. This thing should be a Machine, but it says Dragon. I could've done something with my Machinas. NO!

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Is there anything you DONT think is crap? You have already condemned Infernities and Scraps as overhyped/worthless' date=' and they're so clearly NOT.[/quote']

Prove it? o_0

 

What DOES impress you?

Your mom was pretty impressive last night...

 

... I kid I kid! But why do you have to make this all a personal attack instead of... you know... addressing the issues present?

 

If this thing was MORE generic' date=' it'd be broken, probably worse than Brionac,[/quote']

Level 9's not the easiest level to Synchro into. Giving up field presence to bounce may not always be the best idea. I'm not saying it's horrible card or w/e, just... mostly unimpressed.

 

especially from what I know about how Scraps like destroying themselves.

From what I see of the archetype' date=' them destroying themselves isn't at all a benefit. Failure is not a marketable product, no matter how much of a surplus you have of it.

 

It's like you're purposefully ignorant of an archetype's potential when you look at individual cards.

Some think the archetype is impressive or w/e, I think it's not all that great. Rather then explaining why I'm some misguided fool or something you just go out on some stupid tirade against me. Okay!

 

I have to study the Scrap Archetype a little more to see its full potential' date=' but I agree that this is a good card for the Archetype.[/quote']

Average card for a meh-average archetype. You're impressed far too easily.

[evilfusion]

Is there anything you DONT think is crap? You have already condemned Infernities and Scraps as overhyped/worthless' date=' and they're so clearly NOT.[/quote']

Prove it? o_0

Can't for Scraps, haven't tested. Know Infernities aren't crap.

 

What DOES impress you?

Your mom was pretty impressive last night...

 

... I kid I kid! But why do you have to make this all a personal attack instead of... you know... addressing the issues present?

Frankly' date=' because I grew weary of seeing many of your posts state things like "Garbage. Next?" or "lolinfernity" or just outright stating cards with potential are worthless. While I haven't been so bored to look at EVERY post you make on cards, it begs the question of what cards you DO think are good if you're so quick to bash on things. It's not meant to be a personal attack, I'm just puzzled by your overall pessimissm towards archetypes.[/b']

 

If this thing was MORE generic' date=' it'd be broken, probably worse than Brionac,[/quote']

Level 9's not the easiest level to Synchro into. Giving up field presence to bounce may not always be the best idea. I'm not saying it's horrible card or w/e, just... mostly unimpressed.

I may have miscounted the stars. I mostly just read the effect, so...point to you.

 

especially from what I know about how Scraps like destroying themselves.

From what I see of the archetype' date=' them destroying themselves isn't at all a benefit. Failure is not a marketable product, no matter how much of a surplus you have of it.

[b']I'll admit my knowledge of Scraps is secondhand and I haven't studied the archetype for their true potential yet. However, I'm not so quick to write them off as useless.

 

It's like you're purposefully ignorant of an archetype's potential when you look at individual cards.

Some think the archetype is impressive or w/e' date=' I think it's not all that great. Rather then explaining why I'm some misguided fool or something you just go out on some stupid tirade against me. Okay!

[b']Part of my tirade's emotion is likely from your anti-Infernity sentiments, where you ARE a misguided fool and just refuse to admit it. And that archetype specifically you do admit to having next to no idea how it's meant to work, yet continue to hawk it off as overhyped. Yes...I'm biased, heh.[/b]

 

I have to study the Scrap Archetype a little more to see its full potential' date=' but I agree that this is a good card for the Archetype.[/quote']

Average card for a meh-average archetype. You're impressed far too easily.

 

Merely considering the archetype has yet to emerge outside Japan, it's a bit too early to label them as garbage. I'm not genuinely impressed by Scrap Twin, but I at least try to approach cards as if they can work, until proven that they truly cannot. Primarily, I was asking what type of cards aren't garbage in your eyes, since so many ARE.

[Guest PikaPerson01]

Can't for Scraps, haven't tested. Know Infernities aren't crap.

Prove it.

 

Frankly, because I grew weary of seeing many of your posts state things like "Garbage. Next?" or "lolinfernity" or just outright stating cards with potential are worthless. While I haven't been so bored to look at EVERY post you make on cards, it begs the question of what cards you DO think are good if you're so quick to bash on things. It's not meant to be a personal attack, I'm just puzzled by your overall pessimissm towards archetypes.

And frankly, I grow weary of the lack of intelligent debates on this board. I can come up with a miriade of reasons why V card is great, why W card sucks, why X is infinetely better then Y, and why Z card is bannable, but at the end of the day the people on the board have long since stopped caring, write ridiculous one sentence responses to essays and etc etc. I wrote a load of useless paragraphs upon paragraphs in my heyday about this game and nowadays no one can even wittle up one in defense to their opinions.

 

I'll admit my knowledge of Scraps is secondhand and I haven't studied the archetype for their true potential yet. However, I'm not so quick to write them off as useless.

I didn't write them off as useless either. I merely made a stupid, obvious troll joke, and then gave my earnest opinion, that they weren't worth it. A decktype who's sole purpose is to get on the field and then explode itself might be more useful if there was any benefit to having them be destroyed.

 

Part of my tirade's emotion is likely from your anti-Infernity sentiments, where you ARE a misguided fool and just refuse to admit it. And that archetype specifically you do admit to having next to no idea how it's meant to work, yet continue to hawk it off as overhyped. Yes...I'm biased, heh.

Go ahead. Explain what's so misguided and foolish about my claim that Infernities are over hyped. They're being hailed like they're the second coming, when it's only like one card in their deck that's even remotely broken.

 

tldr: Lol YCM

[Dark_Armed_Zombie]

If Scrap Dragon's revival effect worked when destroyed by it's own effect, it would be a field clearing maniac. That aside, most of the non-synchro Scraps make the "self-destruct" effects +0's by allowing you to add a Scrap monster from the grave to your hand. Not super fantastic, but it does help offset the advantage. Scrap Golem has the ability to revive a Scrap monster to either side of the field from your grave, allowing you to either sync for giant syncs or set up for more advantage from Scraps being destroyed (destroying a scrap on both sides of the field and such). They don't have anything superiorly awesome at the moment, but the general mechanic of causing +0 destruction (or +1 via Scrap destruction effects) shows potential for later cards.