Manjoume Thunder Posted June 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 You know what it does ... Anyway, there is a new ruling that makes it even better. You can now look at your opponent's hand to verify that he does not have any/more copies of the card that you declared. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 You know what it does ... Anyway, there is a new ruling that makes it even better. You can now look at your opponent's hand to verify that he does not have any/more copies of the card that you declared. Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 really? now i wish it was back at 2 again :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 really? now i wish it was back at 2 again :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 That ruling didn't exist before? Either way. <3 Card is <3. Sided in a lot of my Decks. Might even main it somewhere if I can find room... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 That ruling didn't exist before? Either way. <3 Card is <3. Sided in a lot of my Decks. Might even main it somewhere if I can find room... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted June 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 That ruling didn't exist before?No.Either way. <3 Card is <3. Sided in a lot of my Decks. Might even main it somewhere if I can find room...Main it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted June 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 That ruling didn't exist before?No.Either way. <3 Card is <3. Sided in a lot of my Decks. Might even main it somewhere if I can find room...Main it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Wish it was still @2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byak Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Wish it was still @2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 This ruling is kinda' like Abyssal Designator in Wc10. You can use it to look at your opponent's whole deck. .......New ruling on Designator pl0x? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 This ruling is kinda' like Abyssal Designator in Wc10. You can use it to look at your opponent's whole deck. .......New ruling on Designator pl0x? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 I want to main it in all of my decks this format because I love the card but I don't want to declare a card name unless I'm completely sure. That makes this dead a fair amount of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Sir Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 I want to main it in all of my decks this format because I love the card but I don't want to declare a card name unless I'm completely sure. That makes this dead a fair amount of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 I always thought it was logical that you look at your opponent's hand. It reduces the chance of cheating. I remember this card on Wifi once. I swear the guy had to have cheated somehow, because there's no way in hell this should have happened. I was running a Cyber deck, he goes first and does something. On my turn, he uses Mind Crush. I kind of smirked at this. After all, it was turn 2 and I didn't have any blatantly obvious cards in my hand. There was no way he could have guessed a card in my hand with any degree of accuracy. He declares, of all things, "Proto-Cyber Dragon". I had 2 Proto-Cyber Dragons in my hand and no other monsters. HOW THE HELL?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 I always thought it was logical that you look at your opponent's hand. It reduces the chance of cheating. I remember this card on Wifi once. I swear the guy had to have cheated somehow' date=' because there's no way in hell this should have happened. I was running a Cyber deck, he goes first and does something. On my turn, he uses Mind Crush. I kind of smirked at this. After all, it was turn 2 and I didn't have any blatantly obvious cards in my hand. There was no way he could have guessed a card in my hand with any degree of accuracy. He declares, of all things, "Proto-Cyber Dragon". I had 2 Proto-Cyber Dragons in my hand and no other monsters. HOW THE HELL?![/quote'] See-their-hand cheats exist, yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 That's what I thought. It just seemed so unlikely that, even if he had known the deck I was running (possible), that he would have named Proto-Cyber as opposed to regular Cyber, and he would not only be RIGHT, but that there were 2 of them in my hand at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
玄魔の王 Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 PENALTY GAME! MIND CRUSH! I have to agree with the above; it doesn't make sense that such wasn't already a rule. Now that it is, just one more enticement. Along with BWW, XX-DS, XX-R, GS, SG, etc... Yeah, RUN IT! DO IT NOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Fair card should be at 3 on a fair list. I'd say even on this list but there is an argument to counter that point that I have not yet bothered finding a way to respond to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted June 28, 2010 Report Share Posted June 28, 2010 MIND CRUSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IN STEREO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lol ah and to this card should be at 3 I think they don't want people stacking this card according to the new ruling...But all in all having been ruled that way made this card Just Awesome... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted June 28, 2010 Report Share Posted June 28, 2010 Chain Destruction is a 100% chance to look at your opponent's hand/deck, or Extra Deck. The main reason for this is that your opponent does not perform any of the destruction. You as the user of Chain Destruction is the one destroying the cards in the Hand or Deck. Therefore, you get to look at those cards and perform the destruction yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted June 28, 2010 Report Share Posted June 28, 2010 I'm pretty sure Chain Destruction wont touch the Extra Deck, since it doesn't say "Fusion/Extra Deck". Without the distinction, it only touches the main deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted June 28, 2010 Report Share Posted June 28, 2010 I'm pretty sure Chain Destruction wont touch the Extra Deck' date=' since it doesn't say "Fusion/Extra Deck". Without the distinction, it only touches the main deck.[/quote'] A Fusion or Synchro monster can be valid targets for this card (provided that it has 2000 ATK or less). If a Fusion or Synchro monster is targeted by this card, then you can search the Extra Deck. I wasn't saying you could check all three at once, that's why i said "hand/deck, or Extra Deck". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted June 28, 2010 Report Share Posted June 28, 2010 I'm pretty sure Chain Destruction wont touch the Extra Deck' date=' since it doesn't say "Fusion/Extra Deck". Without the distinction, it only touches the main deck.[/quote'] A Fusion or Synchro monster can be valid targets for this card (provided that it has 2000 ATK or less). If a Fusion or Synchro monster is targeted by this card, then you can search the Extra Deck. I wasn't saying you could check all three at once, that's why i said "hand/deck, or Extra Deck". It can't look at the Extra Deck under any circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkwolf777 Posted June 28, 2010 Report Share Posted June 28, 2010 I'm pretty sure Chain Destruction wont touch the Extra Deck' date=' since it doesn't say "Fusion/Extra Deck". Without the distinction, it only touches the main deck.[/quote'] A Fusion or Synchro monster can be valid targets for this card (provided that it has 2000 ATK or less). If a Fusion or Synchro monster is targeted by this card, then you can search the Extra Deck. I wasn't saying you could check all three at once, that's why i said "hand/deck, or Extra Deck". It can't look at the Extra Deck under any circumstances. Then you're saying that a Fusion/Synchro monster is not a valid target for this card if you're telling me that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.