Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 [align=Center] Either player can pay 800 Life Points to negate a Special Summon of a monster(s)' date=' and/or the effect that Special Summons a monster(s) and destroy those cards.[/quote'][/align] Discuss its list position and whatnot with reasoning to back it up. Oh and this topic is a trap for bad players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Make it unlimited. It makes sure Special Summoning don't go rampant. Also, Pojo users thinks this card is OPed and banned all because it stops Special Summoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Unlimited Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Unlimited This. I luv my cumrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Also' date=' Pojo users thinks this card is OPed and banned all because it stops Special Summoning.[/quote'] I know. I was there. So far, the majority of stuff there has forced me to use the palm of my hand to obscure my vision to avoid my eyes getting burnt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Unlimited. I can see it being put @2 and I wouldn't mind that, but it needs to be unlimited, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Also' date=' Pojo users thinks this card is OPed and banned all because it stops Special Summoning.[/quote'] I know. I was there. So far, the majority of stuff there has forced me to use the palm of my hand to obscure my vision to avoid my eyes getting burnt. When I'm there. I want to troll. But not just any brand of trolling. But trolling while bonding with Blakie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Unlimited. I can see it being put @2 and I wouldn't mind that' date=' but it needs to be unlimited, really.[/quote'] It already is at 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 I'd really like this @3. It's trivial to get around, so you can't pretend that it entirely removes Decks from the game, else Glads would never see play. It makes Decks that swarm insanely to get knocked down a peg, which is needed since the game makes those Decks overpowered by default. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El-Rrey Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 I'd really like this @3. It's trivial to get around' date=' so you can't pretend that it entirely removes Decks from the game, else Glads would never see play. It makes Decks that swarm insanely to get knocked down a peg, which is needed since the game makes those Decks overpowered by default.[/quote'] The truth!! The fact it doesn't work during Damage Step makes this card good where it is!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The ReBeL Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 keep at2 because of disord and shceme trap card. I wouldnt care at 3 beacuse it would be countered or mst so it does not matter.forget it 3 all the way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 I love cards that SS but still get around this guy. Vayu, Gorz etc. <3 this card! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaime Duferier Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 It's very good. I like it a lot.nice picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professional Duelist Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 I think 2 is the perfect number. 3 wouldn't make a difference for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Unlimited. I can see it being put @2 and I wouldn't mind that' date=' but it needs to be unlimited, really.[/quote'] It already is at 2 Whoops. @2 is fine, but @3 would be best. It would knock down BWs a peg or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Unlimited. I can see it being put @2 and I wouldn't mind that' date=' but it needs to be unlimited, really.[/quote'] It already is at 2 Whoops. @2 is fine, but @3 would be best. It would knock down BWs a peg or two. BW's are fine right now... and they main Oppression... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 One of the best anti-meta cards ever. Should never go lower than 2, could do well at 3 (to weaken top-tier decks even more), etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Terrible (for me), next? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Really isn't as horrible as what Konami and Pojo says. BTW, Jurracs love Royal Oppression. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Should be banned in the ridiculous 3-0 formats that Pojers want. Oh, and when Crab said that this should be banned, everyone agreed with him, even though you have a completely different opinion. Now, when people who can't argue with you (because they are on a different forum) say that it should be banned, you start insulting them. Typical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Should be banned in the ridiculous 3-0 formats that Pojers want. Oh' date=' and when Crab said that this should be banned, everyone agreed with him, even though you have a completely different opinion. Now, when people who can't argue with you (because they are on a different forum) say that it should be banned, you start insulting them. Typical.[/quote'] Please see Tronta's sig for the explanation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Should be banned in the ridiculous 3-0 formats that Pojers want. How so? Oh' date=' and when Crab said that this should be banned, everyone agreed with him, even though you have a completely different opinion.[/quote'] Because Crab Helmet said it, it must be true right? Oh and when did Crab Helmet say this should be banned? Now' date=' when people who can't argue with you (because they are on a different forum) say that it should be banned, you start insulting them. Typical.[/quote'] Nah. It isn't that. I did initially post this topic to see what YCM thought of it while trapping bad players in the process. I'd say I've trapped a few so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Should be banned in the ridiculous 3-0 formats that Pojers want. How so? Oh' date=' and when Crab said that this should be banned, everyone agreed with him, even though you have a completely different opinion.[/quote'] Because Crab Helmet said it, it must be true right? Oh and when did Crab Helmet say this should be banned? Now' date=' when people who can't argue with you (because they are on a different forum) say that it should be banned, you start insulting them. Typical.[/quote'] Nah. It isn't that. I did initially post this topic to see what YCM thought of it while trapping bad players in the process. I'd say I've trapped a few so far. There was a RO thread last format. IIRC It was an 8-page Tempest VS Crab and followers debate. :D You weren't active during that time. @1stQuestion: Don't ask me, it is their ridiculous 3-0 format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted July 11, 2010 Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 TCG is like North Korea - Everlasting Gratitude (i.e. nodding everything through like a gormless bobble-head) to Our Dear Leader (Crab Helmet). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted July 11, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2010 Should be banned in the ridiculous 3-0 formats that Pojers want. How so? Oh' date=' and when Crab said that this should be banned, everyone agreed with him, even though you have a completely different opinion.[/quote'] Because Crab Helmet said it, it must be true right? Oh and when did Crab Helmet say this should be banned? Now' date=' when people who can't argue with you (because they are on a different forum) say that it should be banned, you start insulting them. Typical.[/quote'] Nah. It isn't that. I did initially post this topic to see what YCM thought of it while trapping bad players in the process. I'd say I've trapped a few so far. There was a RO thread last format. IIRC It was an 8-page Tempest VS Crab and followers debate. :D You weren't active during that time. Figured as much. Know who posted it? @1stQuestion: Don't ask me' date=' it is their ridiculous 3-0 format.[/quote'] Makes sense I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.