TMD (Barushi) Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 What if decks had a limit? Like.. What if decks were only allowed to have 20 monsters, 10 spells, and 10 traps? Discuss how the meta would be affected if we had this limit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 X-Sabers would be tier 1. Oh, wait ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Counter Faries would be awesome? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Counter Faries would be awesome? With 10 traps? Doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 X-Sabers would be tier 1. Oh' date=' wait ...[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Glads get screwed over, so do Gadgets. actually i'm surpised this hasnt happened yet.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMD (Barushi) Posted July 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Glads get screwed over Yay! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 No, thats not a YAY...thats a NAY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMD (Barushi) Posted July 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 No' date=' thats not a YAY...thats a NAY[/quote'] Might be a NAY for you, but it's a YAY for me. I don't like Glads. <_< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Diamond Dude cries even more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Glads get screwed over Yay! NAY MUTHA funker! Gadgets must survive! Until a better version of themselves come out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Glads get screwed over Yay! NAY MUTHA f***er! Gadgets must survive! Until a better version of themselves come out! or they release some sort of Purple Gadget... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Infernities would see no play. The meta would be completely morphed. I would hate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 I'd quit the game and switch to Pokemon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Lawless Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 would make deckbuilding completely different, and would really screw over the meta. wouldn't it ruin FTK's like Gallis and Frog FTK, too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 My Machina Gadgets would survive. I could definitely still use them, and well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMD (Barushi) Posted July 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 Hm.. It'd be interesting to see what happens if they do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted July 22, 2010 Report Share Posted July 22, 2010 My Machina Gadgets would survive. I could definitely still use them' date=' and well.[/quote'] 20 monsters in Gadgets would be pretty bad. Anyway, this topic is useless. This format will make X-Sabers even more broken and seeing how they are close to tier 0 now, I do no want to think what will happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BulletMan Posted July 22, 2010 Report Share Posted July 22, 2010 My Machina Gadgets would survive. I could definitely still use them' date=' and well.[/quote'] 20 monsters in MACHINA Gadgets would be pretty bad. Gadgets, yes. Machina, no. This isn't 5th Gadget. >__> But then again, this ruling doesn't exist. Otherwise, I play around 23 monsters in that Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Griffin Posted July 22, 2010 Report Share Posted July 22, 2010 ... I'm a snowstorm burning~Er, I mean It'd be kinda pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WithTheWind Posted July 22, 2010 Report Share Posted July 22, 2010 Atleast there would be no more noob decks with over 45 cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMD (Barushi) Posted July 22, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 22, 2010 My Machina Gadgets would survive. I could definitely still use them' date=' and well.[/quote'] 20 monsters in Gadgets would be pretty bad. Anyway, this topic is useless. This format will make X-Sabers even more broken and seeing how they are close to tier 0 now, I do no want to think what will happen. Thanks for posting in a useless topic of uselessness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted July 22, 2010 Report Share Posted July 22, 2010 I dunno about everyone else, but this is probably what would happen to me: Step 1: Drop YGO TCG.Step 2: Divert resources which would be otherwise spent on YGO to PKMN.Step 3: Become high-ranked at PKMN, as now I can actually afford the meta decks and the highly-expensive staples that every deck must run at 4.Step 4: Obtain paid ranking invite to PKMN's World Championship.Step 5: Win PKMN's Worlds, getting all PKMN merchandise for a year, including a free booster box of every new set and another paid trip to worlds.Step 6: Repeat step 5 until I inevitably lose at worlds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted July 22, 2010 Report Share Posted July 22, 2010 Pointless. Wouldn't happen.[/topic] My decks wouldn't really die out, but needless traps would stop me from drawing what I want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted July 22, 2010 Report Share Posted July 22, 2010 I doubt the limits would be this strict. I was thinking maybe something like: Monsters 18-23, Spells 10-12, and Traps 8-10, but the total of the deck still has to be at least 40 (and at most 45 to allow for Fifth Gadget). Making the limits this strict would take away part of the creativity of the game and kill at least a few decktypes (the first one I think of is Crystal Beasts). It would also kill the usage of Royal Decree and many people would probably rather use Trap Stun. Even my less restrictive limits would do that. I think Good Goblin Housekeeping and/or Legacy of Yata-Garasu would probably fill in the extra trap spots, if Trap Stun didn't do that already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.