Dragonic Knight

[byak]

 

It's in the Draco-Equiste tin.

Not surprised, really.

 

Anyways discuss.

[WithTheWind]

Pros:

An easy to summon +1.

It has decent stats.

It's a Dragon.

 

Cons:

Level 7.

FIRE attribute.

Situational.

 

I kind of like it.

[byak]

It's not a +1. :S

[darkwolf777]

The advantage can't really be determined clearly x.o Because it requires the targeted cards on the field to be used for its summon, its a -1 at minimum (assuming only 1 card was targeted). Then from their, you consider what your opponent lost due to their "card that targeted" failing because the targets are gone. Either way, you wont get any card advantage from this :

[byak]

The only monsters that are meta that can trigger this off the top of my hand are Murmillo/Gyzarus/Ryko/Descendant.

There's probably more though.

[WithTheWind]

Oh, I thought it said it negates the effect too..

 

Now it sucks.

[-Griffin]

DAD... er... yeah, not that many targets =/

Give it +1 level, remove the monster-effect restriction and negate and destroy the card that activated the effect. Now it sucks a bit less.

[Master Marik]

The card that this card would be used against best is DAD since you wouldn't want to send your monster targeted via Book of Moon to the Grave for this.

[Dr. Cakey]

The card that this card would be used against best is DAD since you wouldn't want to send your monster targeted via Book of Moon to the Grave for this.

 

Only works when it's an Effect Monster that targets.

 

If it wasn't, it would actually be usable. For example:

 

Attack with...Stardust Dragon, for example.

Opponent activates D-Prison.

Use Dragonic Knight. D-Prison loses its target, continue the attack with Dragonic Knight.

Get back Stardust with CotH etc.

[Flame Dragon]

The advantage can't really be determined clearly x.o Because it requires the targeted cards on the field to be used for its summon' date=' its a -1 at minimum (assuming only 1 card was targeted). Then from their, you consider what your opponent lost due to their "card that targeted" failing because the targets are gone. Either way, you wont get any card advantage from this :

[/quote']

You can't, or shouldn't, count the cards you give up since you would loss them any way. So it can get card advantage.

 

Still, it's much to situational to be good.

[El-Rrey]

Pros:

An easy to summon +1.

It has decent stats.

It's a Dragon.

 

Cons:

Level 7.

FIRE attribute.

Situational.

 

I kind of like it.

[Dr. Cakey]

The advantage can't really be determined clearly x.o Because it requires the targeted cards on the field to be used for its summon' date=' its a -1 at minimum (assuming only 1 card was targeted). Then from their, you consider what your opponent lost due to their "card that targeted" failing because the targets are gone. Either way, you wont get any card advantage from this :<

[/quote']

You can't, or shouldn't, count the cards you give up since you would loss them any way. So it can get card advantage.

 

Still, it's much to situational to be good.

 

If you don't count the cards you lose, then -1 to hand, +1 to field, which my B in Honors Geometry tells me is a +0.

[Expelsword]

 

It's in the Draco-Equiste tin.

Not surprised' date=' really.

 

Anyways discuss.

[/quote']

 

Monster and Targets are the operative words, and they keep it from being fairly good

[darkwolf777]

The advantage can't really be determined clearly x.o Because it requires the targeted cards on the field to be used for its summon' date=' its a -1 at minimum (assuming only 1 card was targeted). Then from their, you consider what your opponent lost due to their "card that targeted" failing because the targets are gone. Either way, you wont get any card advantage from this :<

[/quote']

You can't, or shouldn't, count the cards you give up since you would loss them any way. So it can get card advantage.

 

Still, it's much to situational to be good.

 

I would since you can use other card effects that wouldn't result with the targeted monsters being destroyed/removed. Given any choices you have, you choose to remove them in order to summon this. I'd still consider it a -1 on your end.

[Zauls]

Give it 1 more star, make it Dark or Light, give it this effect:

When a monster you control is would be affected by the effect of a card your opponent controls, you can negate the effect and Special Summon this card from your hand.

 

Then it is good. It is awful right now. Outclassed by Van'Dalgyon.

[~Hado~]

I have that card. You can get it if you buy a certain edition of Shonen Jump (notice how it says JUMP-EN026). Though there are WAY better cards that you can get from it, so you won't be dissapointed. (they always include TGC cards, like Naruto, One Piece, etc.).

[Flame Dragon]

The advantage can't really be determined clearly x.o Because it requires the targeted cards on the field to be used for its summon' date=' its a -1 at minimum (assuming only 1 card was targeted). Then from their, you consider what your opponent lost due to their "card that targeted" failing because the targets are gone. Either way, you wont get any card advantage from this :

[/quote']

You can't, or shouldn't, count the cards you give up since you would loss them any way. So it can get card advantage.

 

Still, it's much to situational to be good.

 

If you don't count the cards you lose, then -1 to hand, +1 to field, which my B in Honors Geometry tells me is a +0.

They way I was thinking of thing is that if the card they used had a cost of it's own, lets say dicard a card, then you would have made that a wasted card turning what is still a 1 for 1 into an advantage for you.

 

The advantage can't really be determined clearly x.o Because it requires the targeted cards on the field to be used for its summon' date=' its a -1 at minimum (assuming only 1 card was targeted). Then from their, you consider what your opponent lost due to their "card that targeted" failing because the targets are gone. Either way, you wont get any card advantage from this :

[/quote']

You can't, or shouldn't, count the cards you give up since you would loss them any way. So it can get card advantage.

 

Still, it's much to situational to be good.

 

I would since you can use other card effects that wouldn't result with the targeted monsters being destroyed/removed. Given any choices you have, you choose to remove them in order to summon this. I'd still consider it a -1 on your end.

It's only a -1 if you opponent didn't pay some kind of cost. For some cards it could turn a a 1 for 1 into an advantage for you. It's not any real advantage, yes, but you still come out ahead.