arkel Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Book_of_Moon Discuss the relevancy of this card next format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 Should've been limited (It was limited before). Everyone uses it as a staple @2-3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [quote name='0-Chill' timestamp='1282230122' post='4542350'] Should've been limited (It was limited before). [/quote] I lol'd. Anyway, it's an amazing card, always has been and always will be. I think this will be played a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 It's probarly going to horrible with Dark Hole, Black Rose Dragons and X-Sabers rampaging every where. But we'll just have to wait and see how it works out in the next format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 Should've been limited. But i'm not suprised it wasn't. This is Failnomi we're talking about, after al. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth_The_Legend Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 should have bought 3 supers of this when it was limited. they were like $20 anywho, awesome card. i try incorporate into every deck i run, seems to be one of the cards of the format atm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 @DAD: Why would you let your opponent summon BRD if you have a Book down? And Book is pretty neat VS Sabers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 .... Somebody explain why BoM needs to be limited. I see no reason for it to be at anything other than 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [quote name='Canadian' timestamp='1282234571' post='4542599'] .... Somebody explain why BoM needs to be limited. I see no reason for it to be at anything other than 3. [/quote] Because [b]everyone[/b] runs it @3? That alone should have made it limitworthy, but Konami partially fails at making banlists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manjoume Thunder Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 That is one of the worst reasoning I have ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1282235776' post='4542668'] That is one of the worst reasoning I have ever seen. [/quote] Indeed. If you agree with him, mind sharing your opinion on why than? (: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [quote name='0-Chill' timestamp='1282235537' post='4542651'] but Konami partially fails at making banlists. [/quote] No, they do the B& lists backwards. Instead of banning Starlight, they limited Dark Hole and unlimited Black Rose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hyperion Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1282234416' post='4542586'] @DAD: Why would you let your opponent summon BRD if you have a Book down? And Book is pretty neat VS Sabers. [/quote] >___> *grabs Zombie deck* *raplaces 2 PWWB with 2 BoM* EDIT: And people found this limit worthy? What? What? f***ing what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 Evidently staples must be limited in some fashion. It was once limited due to Flip Effect abuse, like Mask and Magician, not because everyone ran it. It's a very versatile card, but not OPed at all. It does not deserve to be limited at all. It can be used offensively and defensively, to stop attacks, move monsters into more vulnerable defense, reset Flips, reset effects, protect your vulnerable monsters from attacks or targeting effects, and so on. It's not even removal. That said, it's still an incredible card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [u]LIST TIME[/u] @3 Splashable Negates attacks Dodge Bottomless Dodge Lightning Vortex Easy kills (DAD) Reuse Flip Effects Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zauls Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 Probably the most versatile card in the game. Amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 One of the few amazing cards in the game. It's versatile, spashable, and lovely in Spirits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [quote name='General VK-Duelist/Shepard' timestamp='1282241669' post='4543218'] One of the few amazing cards in the game. It's versatile, spashable, and lovely in Spirits. [/quote] Spirts have their OWN Book of Moon... but it was too good to be true... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [quote name='Expelsword' timestamp='1282242570' post='4543302'] Spirts have their OWN Book of Moon... but it was too good to be true... [/quote] Yep..... She was one of the best Spirit cards. Why can't she be limited again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 Probably because a reusable Book in monster form is a bit TOO abusable with cards like Mask of Darkness and the Drop Off set. Or just Mirror Force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1282243280' post='4543371'] Probably because a reusable Book in monster form is a bit TOO abusable with cards like Mask of Darkness and the Drop Off set. Or just Mirror Force. [/quote] True. She could be searched and the such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poopybuttoxes Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 Its the best -1 ever! [/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 Strange. Why so sarcastic? Foolish Burial is a -1, but it's considered a good card in most cases. Don't let the card advantage aspect override how useful a card is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Unclean One: VK Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1282243789' post='4543411'] Strange. Why so sarcastic? Foolish Burial is a -1, but it's considered a good card in most cases. Don't let the card advantage aspect override how useful a card is. [/quote] This is true. Look at Yamata No Orochi. Most of the times, he's a -2 or -3. But if done correctly, he'll be a +2, or +3. -1 Mausoleum -1 summoning him attack directly or something + 2-3 depending on your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Expelsword Posted August 19, 2010 Report Share Posted August 19, 2010 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1282243789' post='4543411'] Strange. Why so sarcastic? Foolish Burial is a -1, but it's considered a good card in most cases. Don't let the card advantage aspect override how useful a card is. [/quote] Stardust Dragon is (usually) -1 /Assault is a -2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.