Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted November 29, 2010 Share Posted November 29, 2010 · Hidden by Zeppeli Gyro Supreme, March 8, 2011 - old and outdated Hidden by Zeppeli Gyro Supreme, March 8, 2011 - old and outdated This probably isn't the best place to ask, but does anyone remember/have the original rules? I have a 2-year-old warning from the TCG section that I don't even know what it's for anymore. I think it might have been a duplicate topic, but like I said, I don't know. Link to comment
Hi-Def Legacy Posted February 27, 2011 Report Share Posted February 27, 2011 what about cards that are not yet released yet they were on the show say like blaster ogre and gatlling ogre or infernity doomslinger and infernity zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 what about cards that are not yet released yet they were on the show say like blaster ogre and gatlling ogre or infernity doomslinger and infernity zeroThat would be an anime-only card, which is fine and dandy to discuss, as long as you highlight somewhere that the card is an anime-only card. However, it should be a card that has info about it available. If all you know is Yusei summons Super Special Awesome Ultra Sexy Super Dragon in next weeks episode, but don't know it's effect, attack, level, etc etc, it'd just be pointless speculation and speculation isn't allowed. Can we have a rule implemented where the Original Poster of the Topic must highlight 2 things they want to discuss, when discussing Single Cards? I looked at a few threads, where it was just a picture of the card and then the word "discuss." Basically, this forces people to actually think about the card before posting, and gives a topic a direction.Oh... I never responded to this. > > I always figured something like this would be "greatly suggested" as opposed to being mandatory. Too many topics would end up getting locked and it'd end up being too much work on your TCG mod. tl;dr - I'm fine with it being "strongly suggested" but not with it being mandatory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 8, 2011 Report Share Posted March 8, 2011 New "subtle" change to the rules. 2d: Policy on Anime-Only, Manga-Only, Video Game-Only. All anime-only, manga-only, and video game-only cards are free to be discussed. However, make sure when creating said topics you are in compliance with all the rules. ESPECIALLY rule 2c. Furthermore, if your card is anime-only, manga-only, or video game-only, feel free to specify that in the topic title. And by 'feel free', I mean do it. Edit (As of March 8, 2011): And by "do it" I mean, "do it or you're getting a warn increase". Rule 'officially' goes into effect next week to give you some leeway. Remember, topic title is not synonymous to subtitle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted April 9, 2011 Report Share Posted April 9, 2011 How about people don't receive warns for not having the card name in the title for now. The whole point you enforced the rule was so people could find threads via the search bar but that has seemed to stop working altogether. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppeli Gyro Supreme Posted April 13, 2011 Report Share Posted April 13, 2011 There's still the fact that people wouldn't know a lot of the time what the topic is about until they went into it, which they probably wouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted April 14, 2011 Report Share Posted April 14, 2011 How about people don't receive warns for not having the card name in the title for now. The whole point you enforced the rule was so people could find threads via the search bar but that has seemed to stop working altogether.That was one of the reasons for the rule. The other reason was so people would know what they were getting into before they clicked it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Thinking about updating the rules... Any requests? =\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Welche Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Ban Mars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Ban Mars.Q4ME Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Ban Mars.He's already banned. Next? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Welche Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Stick this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 Stick this thread.No. Next? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted July 15, 2011 Report Share Posted July 15, 2011 He's already banned.He is? *fistpump* Anyways, current policy on discussion on sets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Welche Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 Moderator instituted Card of the Day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilhorus Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 He's already banned. Next? Huzzah! I'd like set discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 He is? *fistpump*For seven days. He has like, 4 or 5 more to serve. Anyways, current policy on discussion on sets?Not allowed. "Discussion" of sets typically devolve to either just one or two cards being discussed (which makes later discussions of individual cards redundant) or just spamming of [card name and effect] "Do want!" and that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 Not allowed. "Discussion" of sets typically devolve to either just one or two cards being discussed (which makes later discussions of individual cards redundant) or just spamming of [card name and effect] "Do want!" and that's all.What about threads like "Full spoiler for set X?" Same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 Pika, Please Unpin the DN site advertisement thread. Its rarely used and has little purpose now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CDDRodrigo Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 Pika, Please Unpin the DN site advertisement thread. Its rarely used and has little purpose now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ａ・ジェネクス・リモート Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 Moderator instituted Card of the DayOBJECTION!the images I found were too big. Suggestions?Hm...I've seen a bunch of these pass, so no Structure/Starter deck threads? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 Moderator instituted Card of the DayWhy? We do nothing but discuss cards everyday. It'd be like if Your Deck made a "Deck of the Day" or Literature made a "Book of the Day" or Movies made a "Movie of the Day" or shows made a "Show of the Day" or anime made an "Anime of the Day" or... you get the idea, right? What about threads like "Full spoiler for set X?" Same?My thoughts on multiple cards per topic have always been the same. The more cards you have to talk about, the less (on average) people will say about any individual card. If you typically write 100 words per post, now that you're discussing two cards you're more inclined to do 50 words per discussion. Secondly, if it's a topic about REDRUM and Dandylion, and I more wanna talk about REDRUM, it doesn't serve me any interest to go into that topic if everyone's mostly talking about Dandylion. And I wouldn't be able to make a new topic about just REDRUM because a topic about it already exists. Curiously enough, this effect also applies to created card. Check out an individual card as opposed to a set and you'll see on average people have less to say about individual cards Edit:Suggestions?Hm...I've seen a bunch of these pass, so no Structure/Starter deck threads?I'd probably a bit more lenient with those, as structure decks typically have a narrow enough focus. I believe the rules are "cards that go together" can be talked about at once. It makes no sense to make a topic discussing Sun Dragon and make a seperate topic for Moon Dragon. Likewise multiple cards can probably discussed together in a combo. If they have nothing in common other then release date, you're better off with seperate topics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 1. Does your multiple cards per topic include discussions on themes/archetypes? 2. Discussing vanillas if they have use/viable combos, since there seems to be up and coming support for them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 1. Does your multiple cards per topic include discussions on themes/archetypes?Case-by-case basis. I most likely wouldn't be fine with a HERO archetype discussion (because it's like, 100+ cards with a lot of sub-themes in it. Elemental, Destiny, Masked, Vision, Neospacian) but something smaller like the D-Hero engine or the plant engine would be fine. 2. Discussing vanillas if they have use/viable combos, since there seems to be up and coming support for them? Discuss the support, not the vanilla. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnpsy Posted July 16, 2011 Report Share Posted July 16, 2011 Discuss the support, not the vanilla. What of stuff like Blue-Eyes, where it has a bunch of support pointed directly at it specifically? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.