Manjoume Thunder Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 let's use abbreviations that no else does yaafr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 [quote name='Manjoume Thunder' timestamp='1289032874' post='4765279'] let's use abbreviations that no else does yaafr [/quote] i know what that means, but i'm not a F***ing retard, idfc what you lot think, so should i use i think that in full to shut you t****s up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 [quote name='$super**$star**$silver$' timestamp='1289033322' post='4765283'] i know what that means, but i'm not a F***ing retard, idfc what you lot think, so should i use i think that in full to shut you t****s up [/quote] "I know what that means, but I'm not a f***ing retard. I don't f***ing care what you think. So should I use "I think that" in full to shut you t****s up?" See how much smarter it sounds? AND people can understand. ;D I also have no idea as to what "t****s" is....am I having a brain fart? [img]http://matamich.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/goodgrammarhot.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 ITT: Arguing over grammer =/= card discussion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 [quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1289052710' post='4765617'] ITT: Arguing over gramm[b]a[/b]r =/= card discussion [/quote] Wait, what? "ITT:" or "In this topic:" is a start of a sarcastic comment. Therefore, you're saying that arguing over grammar does equal card discussion. Either that, or you just just failed at using "ITT:" or failed at failing at the use of itt. No, that second option is not a double negative. Either way, it's crap now except maybe side against FTK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 [quote name='Mystery Guest' timestamp='1289057820' post='4765807'] Wait, what? "ITT:" or "In this topic:" is a start of a sarcastic comment. Therefore, you're saying that arguing over grammar does equal card discussion. Either that, or you just just failed at using "ITT:" or failed at failing at the use of itt. No, that second option is not a double negative.[/quote] Sarcasm is basically its own BKSS [quote name='Mystery Guest' timestamp='1289057820' post='4765807']Either way, it's crap now except maybe side against FTK. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted November 6, 2010 Report Share Posted November 6, 2010 Troll & Cock Bird. lol. This looks like fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.