What if their face-down was RECKLESS GREED

[TheTurtleOnceCalledGod]

[img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20090202012339/yugioh/images/c/c6/RecklessGreedSD8-EN-C-1E.jpg[/img]
Ok, people know what it does, temporary +1 that turns into -1 over 2 of your turns.
Best used in 3 copies, otherwise the loss of the draw phase is too great.
The fact that it is a trap makes it slower, but could this be a draw engine for SCRAPS?
Discuss

[Sephiroth_The_Legend]

a real 3-0 card...

[burnpsy]

3 of these = +1
2 of these = +0
1 of these = -1

Using 2 or more at once is best. That said, it sucks on its own so it's probably not worth the slot.

[Canadian]

Not splashable unless your making an OTK deck. Even still, it's not always going to help.

[El-Rrey]

People who think this card is awesome deserve to hang theirselves! Skipping Draw Phases are like . . . so terrible.

[Toffee.]

[quote name='TheTurtleOnceCalledGod' timestamp='1289298452' post='4773828']
but could this be a draw engine for SCRAPS?
[/quote]
It actually isn't.
At most, I just troll it with Dragon for more advantage.
Pretty hilarious.

[Zauls]

The only time when this card is good is when you have 3. It just isn't worth running. Cards like Upstart Goblin and even Jar of Greed outclass it.

[Catterjune]

A bannable card that encourages players to draw quickly and disregard Draw Phases (As it doesn't matter that their next Draw Phases would be skipped if they already won the duel that turn.)

[evilfusion]

I think this card is more a lesson about immediate gratification in terms of card advantage.

If you activate it immediately, you will have 2 new cards to use. However, bad draws or not what you needed, and you will be vulnerable for two turns. Had you waited, you could maybe have conserved better to prepare for opponent counters.

If you wait until you can activate two of them, you draw 4 cards, thus making the two turn drop of resources more worthwhile. Card advantage wise, you break even, but you get the cards now. You are much less likely to be screwed over in the next two turns, unless you waste them.

If you wait until you have all 3, you can activate them, and be up a card, six of which you have right now, and the two turn loss is just fine. By saving Reckless for longer, you didnt fall behind and then could pull ahead.

[Jazin Kay]

[quote name='PikaPerson01' timestamp='1289336129' post='4774265']
A bannable card
[/quote]
[img]http://hikkyz.net/void/img/ani/lolno.gif[/img]

Doesn't encourage crap. It's OTK blood. That's it. In good decks, it's just a tinker toy.

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

guys, hey guys

pictures invalidate a clipped fragment of a post

that is all

[Jazin Kay]

[quote name='Vuvuzela of Triumph' timestamp='1289345101' post='4774601']
guys, hey guys

pictures invalidate a clipped fragment of a post

that is all
[/quote]
No they don't. I am emphasizing beforehand my response to a single point in a post in an amusing fashion.

I don't have to reply to all of the post. Neutrality on the remainder is a safe assumption. Thus lending me only the parts I disagree with as something to contend with.

[DARKPLANT RISING]

I wonder what sort of hilariously corrupt and idiotic man that guy in the picture of the card is.

Since I just hate OTKs, I personally think it shouldn't exist. This is my extremely idiotic opinion.

[evilfusion]

I assume a recklessly greedy and genre-blind man who doesn't realize he's on the art of a children's trading card depicting an effect of temporary gain at great risk.

[BehindTheMask]

I dont get the title.

Also, I dont like this card.

Terribad, and doesn't help that much.

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

[quote name='Jazin Kay' timestamp='1289345285' post='4774609']
No they don't. I am emphasizing beforehand my response to a single point in a post in an amusing fashion.

I don't have to reply to all of the post. Neutrality on the remainder is a safe assumption. Thus lending me only the parts I disagree with as something to contend with.
[/quote]
The ignored material was linked with the original statement, so right now you have only made a counterargument.

[Jazin Kay]

[quote name='Vuvuzela of Triumph' timestamp='1289355125' post='4774852']
The ignored material was linked with the original statement, so right now you have only made a counterargument.
[/quote]
The ignore material was irrelevant to what I responded with.

Had I not snipped the quote, it would appear that I was relating the image to the entire message, when that is not the case.

Please stop arguing the stupid and pointless semantic and accept the information.

[burnpsy]

I never even see this used in OTKs.

And, personally, I think it's too slow since it's a trap, kinda like how I dislike Sangan in most OTKs. :/

[~/Coolio Prime\~]

[quote name='Jazin Kay' timestamp='1289358079' post='4774964']
The ignore material was irrelevant to what I responded with.

Had I not snipped the quote, it would appear that I was relating the image to the entire message, when that is not the case.

Please stop arguing the stupid and pointless semantic and accept the information.
[/quote]
On second thought, you made more of a contradiction than a counterargument. I guess asking for an indepth response to foster some discussion was a bit too much, so just forget it.

[Mehmani]

Marmite card.