.:Sonaria:. Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 Haven't seen this yet, so... [img]http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110122214249/yugioh/images/2/2c/MachineImperialGodDragonAsteriskEXVC-JP-SR.jpg[/img] [center][b][i]Lore: This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. If you control 3 or more face-up "Machine Emperor" or "Machine Imperial" monsters, you can Special Summon this card from your hand. When this card is Special Summoned, select any number of other "Machine Emperor" or "Machine Imperial" monsters you control and send them to the Graveyard. This card's ATK is equal to the combined original ATK of the sent monsters. Each time a player Special Summons a Synchro Monster, inflict 1000 damage to that player.[/i][/b][/center] Is it really that bad? Good with Wisel spam, I guess... Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 I think it's official lore is supposed to say "This card can only be Special Summoned when you control three Machine Imperial/Machine Emperor". In any case, it's not good enough. Getting 3 of those monsters out is a pain, and virtually impossible to do against a good player. Because of the effort put into summoning this, the regular Machine Emperors are probably better. If you run Machine Imperials, especially if you use Machina Fortress, put at least 1 in, otherwise, I wouldn't bother. My deck did have a fun instance of having Wisel Infinity and Wisel Ein out, then playing another Wisel Ein and summoning Asterisk, sending Infinity and an Ein to the grave and using the second Ein for piercing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:Sonaria:. Posted February 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 Yeah, I only run 1 in my ME deck, and I run a couple of Machina Fortresses. But I do tend to get it out quite a bit... No, the duelists around my town aren't bad, they're actually pretty good. It did take me a while to finish this deck, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 I do the same thing, with Fortress. But the deck is so "for fun", it runs Skiel despite that it could run a third Wisel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wero-vasto Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 I wait the original lore don't change, that way I can SS it with Tomatoe, CoH, MR, Limit Reverse and so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 Nope, it's the official lore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~British Soul~ Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 [quote name='.:Sonaria:.' timestamp='1297653283' post='5007855'] Haven't seen this yet, so... [/quote] ....and your avi's this card?....[quote name='wero-vasto' timestamp='1297667296' post='5008148'] I wait the original lore don't change, that way I can SS it with Tomatoe, CoH, MR, Limit Reverse and so... [/quote] i hope we can, though i bet the rulings will state we can't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 I think TC meant hasn't seen a topic on this card yet. Obviously he/she/it has seen the card. Well, I read the translation of the full EXVC set and it's a Semi-Nomi now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 OH COME ON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted February 14, 2011 Report Share Posted February 14, 2011 Well, how else was I supposed to update my YVD sets without knowing the translations of all the cards in the set? I'm not surprised, just disappointed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.