Spoon Posted June 14, 2011 Report Share Posted June 14, 2011 [center][IMG]http://img851.imageshack.us/img851/3417/elfh.jpg[/IMG] [quote]If your opponent adds a monster from their Deck to their hand by a card effect: You can discard this card; Destroy that monster. If you control "Ancient Forest" when you activate this effect: Special Summon this card instead. While you control a face-up "Ancient Forest": This card is unaffected by the effect of Spell Cards and can attack your opponent directly.[/quote][/center] Odd support is odd... I consider making a Set revolving around it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manpole Posted June 14, 2011 Report Share Posted June 14, 2011 "If your opponent adds a monster from their Deck to their hand by a card effect, you can discard this card to destroy that monster. If you controlled "Ancient Forest" when you activated this effect: Special Summon this card instead. While you control a face-up "Ancient Forest", this card is unaffected by the effects of Spell Cards and can attack your opponent directly." I like this card qutie a bit, but maybe it could use those small changes I put on your effect. I think it makes it easier to read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted June 14, 2011 Report Share Posted June 14, 2011 [quote name='Manpole' timestamp='1308083124' post='5283265'] "If your opponent adds a monster from their Deck to their hand by a card effect, you can discard this card to destroy that monster. If you controlled "Ancient Forest" when you activated this effect: Special Summon this card instead. While you control a face-up "Ancient Forest", this card is unaffected by the effects of Spell Cards and can attack your opponent directly." I like this card qutie a bit, but maybe it could use those small changes I put on your effect. I think it makes it easier to read. [/quote] No, the OCG changed. Look at the new Meklords. OT: Destroying a card in hand seems unneeded. Should be send or banish. I know it is possible to destroy, but still. I like the SS instead effect. Last effect seems fine. Rather UP, in the end. You are allowing them to dump a monster that they might WANT to dump. Other than that, it is alright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted June 14, 2011 Report Share Posted June 14, 2011 make the set supporting it right now all I see is your opponent setting you up to make you destroy the monster they want destroyed 8.2/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoon Posted June 14, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 14, 2011 [quote name='Manpole' timestamp='1308083124' post='5283265'] "If your opponent adds a monster from their Deck to their hand by a card effect, you can discard this card to destroy that monster. If you controlled "Ancient Forest" when you activated this effect: Special Summon this card instead. While you control a face-up "Ancient Forest", this card is unaffected by the effects of Spell Cards and can attack your opponent directly." I like this card qutie a bit, but maybe it could use those small changes I put on your effect. I think it makes it easier to read.[/quote] Yeah, what Ravenous said, this is the new up and coming "problem-solving card text". It mainly helps to differentiate conditions, costs and effects (hence the overuse of ":" and ";"). [quote name='Ravenous Black' timestamp='1308083616' post='5283289'] OT: Destroying a card in hand seems unneeded. Should be send or banish. I know it is possible to destroy, but still.[/quote] I thought about banishing first, but scrapped it once I decided to create an archetype around it. I considered adding a little damage... and still do so. Like 200 x Level of the destroyed monster, something in that direction, to make it a little different to Drastic Drop Off, which is currently superior in almost any case unless you're going for the "Ancient Forest" theme (which doesn't exist as of now). [quote]Rather UP, in the end. You are allowing them to dump a monster that they might WANT to dump. Other than that, it is alright.[/quote] The thing is: It's optional, and if your opponent adds a card to their hand, they must reveal it. If they add a Dandylion to their hand, you'll of course keep this card where it is. If they use Stratos' effect to add a Neos Alius, go ahead and kill it dead in it's track. [quote name='ragnarok1945' timestamp='1308088234' post='5283477'] make the set supporting it right now all I see is your opponent setting you up to make you destroy the monster they want destroyed 8.2/10[/quote] See above, you know what your opponent is adding, so you can choose to not activate it if it's something your opponent could want in the Grave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted June 15, 2011 Report Share Posted June 15, 2011 Pretty useful and good IMO, Yes you should make a Set about it, before rate it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoon Posted June 16, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 16, 2011 [quote name='Maha Guns' timestamp='1308109241' post='5284242'] Pretty useful and good IMO, Yes you should make a Set about it, before rate it .[/quote] Set would go into Written Cards though, since I can't find enough pictures of this quality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Posted June 17, 2011 Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 The site's been doing this to me lately. When I enter a thread all I see is the phrase "posted image" where the image should stand. Most of the time it turns into the image immediately but right now I'm unable to see it. So my comment is solely in the effect. One question: So if your have [i]Ancient Forest[/i], does that mean this is Special Summoned instead of being discarded, or that it is Special Summon instead of destroying your opponent's added monster? I believe it sounds like the second one but want to make sure. Effect is looking pretty good. You can take away their [i]Pot of Duality[/i] card (if monster), their [i]Sangan[/i] card, or their [i]Dark Soul[/i] card. Contrary to what people say, your opponent cannot manipulate this at all. Why would a player declare that this card is in the hand to begin with? On the other hand I love how everything added must be shown. Second card I know of that destroys from the hand after Neo Spacian Aqua Dolphin. My opinion might slightly change depending on the stats I'm unable to see, but not much since effect already is at least side-Deck worthy. Better than [i]Droll and Lock Bird[/i] to say the least. I'll come back later and might have better luck with my computer... EDIT: Oh! I see it now (five hours after my previous visit xD ) I was kind of worried it would be some high Level monster or something that presented to be hard to search in some way. It came out to be pretty good. Nice picture too. There wasn't really much more for me to comment on since your cards are well thought out from the beginning. Actually. No, I lied. I wasn't worried about that at all. I expected it to be good with respect to the stats I couldn't see before. Keep up the good work =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoon Posted June 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2011 [quote name='sleepy' timestamp='1308271898' post='5288888'] The site's been doing this to me lately. When I enter a thread all I see is the phrase "posted image" where the image should stand. Most of the time it turns into the image immediately but right now I'm unable to see it. So my comment is solely in the effect. One question: So if your have [i]Ancient Forest[/i], does that mean this is Special Summoned instead of being discarded, or that it is Special Summon instead of destroying your opponent's added monster? I believe it sounds like the second one but want to make sure.[/quote] It (meaning this card) is Special Summoned instead of being discarded to the Graveyard (meaning it never hits the Graveyard if the conditions are fulfilled). [quote]Effect is looking pretty good. You can take away their [i]Pot of Duality[/i] card (if monster), their [i]Sangan[/i] card, or their [i]Dark Soul[/i] card.[/quote] I didn't think of Duality, but yes, that would also be possible. On the other hand, I don't know if the wording would allow for it to be used during the Damage Step (aka Sangan if destroyed by battle)... possibly because I used "if" instead of "when", but I lack the knowledge for that. [quote]EDIT: Oh! I see it now (five hours after my previous visit xD ) I was kind of worried it would be some high Level monster or something that presented to be hard to search in some way. It came out to be pretty good. Nice picture too. There wasn't really much more for me to comment on since your cards are well thought out from the beginning. Actually. No, I lied. I wasn't worried about that at all. I expected it to be good with respect to the stats I couldn't see before. Keep up the good work =D[/quote] Thank you The thing is, I'm thinking about creating an Archetype around that whole "Elven" and "Ancient Forest" theme, with mainly low Level monsters that activate from the hand, hindering your opponent's plays and Special Summoning themself, swarming a lot of little monsters, but without the intention of Synchro Summoning rather than trying to force your opponent to waste all their big hitters to Ancient Forest. This is of course all still work in progress Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.