Under_Age_User Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 Invalid? It's plenty valid. Posting uninformed opinions based entirely on what you heard without even the slightest bit of research wouldn't make you a sub-average poster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 and here's how I know what it does, infact what both of them, Shadow Ghoul: increase this card's Atk by 100 for every monster in your Graveyard. The Cheerful Coffin: Discard up to 3 monster cards in your hand to the Graveyard. makes perfect sense, using Wiki. Now, I'm not saying this is a good combo, I just mentioned Shadow Ghoul cuz I don't hear much of him, alright, happy now, or are you still pissed. EDIT: and Marshmallon: If your opponent attacks this Face-Down card, inflict 1000 points of direct damage to your opponent's Life Points, this card cannot be destroyed in battle... Marchmallon Glasses: If this card and "Marshmallon" are Face-Up on your side of the field, your opponent cannot select other cards except for Marshmallon as an attack target, still pissed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HORUS Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 not even in Dark World, eh? anomu, SHADOW GHOUL SUCKS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 and here's how I know what it does' date=' infact what both of them, Shadow Ghoul: increase this card's Atk by 100 for every monster in your Graveyard. The Cheerful Coffin: Discard up to 3 monster cards in your hand to the Graveyard. makes perfect sense, using Wiki. Now, I'm not saying this is a good combo, I just mentioned Shadow Ghoul cuz I don't hear much of him, alright, happy now, or are you still pissed.[/quote'] If you had bothered to read our last three posts, you would know that we were referring to your Marshmallon Glasses suggestion. Also, losing 4 cards from hand has never been worth 300 ATK. Just because a combo can be used doesn't mean it should be mentioned if it would never be used by anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 and here's how I know what it does' date=' infact what both of them, Shadow Ghoul: increase this card's Atk by 100 for every monster in your Graveyard. The Cheerful Coffin: Discard up to 3 monster cards in your hand to the Graveyard. makes perfect sense, using Wiki. Now, I'm not saying this is a good combo, I just mentioned Shadow Ghoul cuz I don't hear much of him, alright, happy now, or are you still pissed.[/quote'] I'm never pissed. I learned at a young age not to speak when I get emotional, but that's besides the point. Basically, what you're saying is that Attack Points >>> Everything, right? Yeah, you're a lousy duelist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 the problem here is that opinion is like the @ss... everybody have one and everybody thinks that the other ones's stinks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 ^You would almost be funny if you were actually almost funny. Unfortunately, you aren't, and you're not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 Like I said, "I'M NOT SUGGESTING RUNNING IT!!!!" quit being a dumbs***. Okay, maybe I like using beat-down decks, which require alot of Atk, but I also believe in supporting and defending your cards with spellls and traps, so no, Atk isn't everything, I also use monster effects to cripple my opponent. I'm not doing a Kaiba and think that sheer power is all you need in a duel, I use my strategies to put my opponent's monsters out of play, and even my own, here's another suggestion, use this card with Gren Maju De Eiza while dimensionl fissure is in play. This strategy I actually use and it serves very usefull, along with soul absorbsion, and I edited my reply, so I put in Marshmallon and his little glasses. And my favorite little tactic ever in my entire deck, which involves a really old card called "Soul Exchange" which infact ladies, doesn't just mean for tribute summon, it can be used to make panther warrior attack, it can be used in alot of other things, my tactic is if I don't have any dragons on my side of the field, I want to revive y Tyrant Dragon from my Graveyard, but to do that I need a dragon to tribute, my last opponent however had a dragon, I used soul exchange to select his dragon for tribute after I used Premature -Burial, got my Tyrant Dragon out there, and it just so happens that I depleted his Field and special summon one of my strongest dragons at the same time, and attacked his Life Points directly and won the duel, that is how I won my last tournament and How I won my last match, don't say that I'm a lousy duelist, you have never seen me duel... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 Is there actually discussion going on here? It seems like this should have been sorted out without even taking up a page. 1. Everyone stating it sucks2. A few people saying it could have a few uses 3. The people who says it sucks acknowledge that it could be used, as any card can, but it still sucks really bad, and using it would overall be a bad idea. 4. Discussion over. Yeah, that seems right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 thank you Shaco, I took number 3. case dismissed... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 ^You would almost be funny if you were actually almost funny. Unfortunately' date=' you aren't, and you're not.[/quote'] i'm not laughing... ¬¬ think that i was joking?? try again clyde... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 Well said Orochi...^^^is the truth... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 Well said Orochi...^^^is the truth... TRICLOPS!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 ...or arrows pointing to the post above me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 Eh, it's a triclops to me ^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 lol...okay, anyway, I seem to have shut those two up for now.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 4. Discussion over. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 4. Discussion over. This. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 spamming already?? what, you're short of sarcastic comments?? what a pity... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 Dude, do you not know what "Discussion over" means? Both sides agreed the card sucks and has no merit in ANY deck, competitive or otherwise. We reached the conclusion that anyone suggesting Cheerful Coffin into any deck is an awful duelist, correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 ok, so everybody agrees with you, it's over... dude, you are a step closer to popularity... yeeehaaaw!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 and your saying that I'm an aweful duelist despite the fact that I was never actually suggesting on running it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 and your saying that I'm an aweful duelist despite the fact that I was never actually suggesting on running it. Is that so? Go back to the second post in the topic. You made it. Read it carefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 ok' date=' so everybody agrees with you, it's over... dude, you are a step closer to popularity... yeeehaaaw!![/quote'] 1: If you disagree, go ahead and spill your heart out. Just don't be upset when each and everyone of your arguments is torn apart.2: Lol, e-popularity. Can I get in trophy-form? It'll look so great next to my first place Girls Swim Team trophy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted February 11, 2008 Report Share Posted February 11, 2008 I did read it carefully, and did I say anything like "put it in your deck", no I was just pointing it out, get off my F***ing @ss about it, and leave me alone, maybe you should learn to read...it might actually get you somewhere. I made the reply, yes, but what I meant is completely different from what your dumb@ss thought about. and take off the damn neg, it's not valid at all. And if you say it is valid, then I guess we should take to to Frunk, or any other mod, because your too immature to handle it correctly...like a good little jack@ss... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.