georgeyboy654 Posted February 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 A deck used in the current "Meta" as the term goes. Basically, a meta deck is a deck used alot at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 A deck used in the current "Meta" as the term goes. Basically' date=' a meta deck is a deck used alot at the time.[/quote'] I realize this, but why the need for a new section? Shouldn't it be simple logic that we should discuss the current or near future of the game in the existing sections? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted February 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 It would stop arguments, so better decks go in one part, and the fun e-hero etc decks in another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 hmmmm thats not what i ment im talking about when you tell somone to change somthing then they are abusive back because they think they are right (its never happned to me but i have seen it b4) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 It would stop arguments' date=' so better decks go in one part, and the fun e-hero etc decks in another.[/quote'] If the decks are just "fun", then why post them at all? The only decks you should post are ones that you feel have a shot at being competitive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted February 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 That's what i think, but some just want to fail. Good luck to them in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Everyone should know my sig is just taking the mick out of the old ban speedguitar and sart for mod thing if anyones should be a mod it should be Daj or somebody young Now' date=' this is what I think is the most... *palmface* thing that has been said. The older members are in the council for a reason, though I will admit, that I respect you and SD more than all of the other younger members. Why should an older member be a moderator? - Broader understanding of life in general- More developed decision making skills- Lack of innocence, the ability to realize an indirect comment, and tell the difference between something that was said to be offensive and something that could be interperted as offensive, but wasn't implyed in such a way.- For the better half of us, the ability to not take personal comments, especially ones from the internet, personally.- Grammar and Spelling.- Diplomacy skills. I think I have enough reasons, though I will admit, some of them can apply to a [b']SMALL[/b] number of younger members, and to you and SD if anyone else. I agree with the entire statement ^_^ yes, we wouldn't want 10 years old members running the site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted February 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 If we did, i would leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 If we did' date=' i would leave.[/quote'] everybody would if that happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 hmmmm thats not what i ment im talking about when you tell somone to change somthing then they are abusive back because they think they are right (its never happned to me but i have seen it b4) But usually, they are right, and if George, HORUS, or anyone of the like could have a section, where decks could be rated HARSHLY, and a section where the level of critical remarks would be much lower, then the problems with the sections would quell. Thus "Meta Deck", decks that could play in the Metagame. MetaCG would be a place where intelligent discussions could be held about the Metagame, and it would be expected that when you make a post, it would be based on competitive play tactics or card usage or whatever... the point remains the same regardless what the discussion is about. The pointless arguments over yugioh would probably go away, as people like E Hero Andrew (and others of course, but he is the prime example) would not post his decks in the Meta Deck section, and the sort of insults that come of his deck topics would/should cease to exist, or at least reduce from what we have now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted February 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Hence helping the harmony of the site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 But usually' date=' they are right, and if George, HORUS, or anyone of the like could have a section, where decks could be rated HARSHLY, and a section where the level of critical remarks would be much lower, then the problems with the sections would quell. Thus "Meta Deck", decks that could play in the Metagame. MetaCG would be a place where intelligent discussions could be held about the Metagame, and it would be expected that when you make a post, it would be based on competitive play tactics or card usage or whatever... the point remains the same regardless what the discussion is about. The pointless arguments over yugioh would probably go away, as people like E Hero Andrew (and others of course, but he is the prime example) would not post his decks in the Meta Deck section, and the sort of insults that come of his deck topics would/should cease to exist, or at least reduce from what we have now.[/quote'] Well, actually, that sounds like a grand idea, now that you put it that way. I support it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted February 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 I dream of people posting good decks. XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 when will it happen when people accept they suck at Deck macking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Diviner Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Everyone that was a joke to.I myself am 10 years old Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sartorius Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 I'm personally a fan of Sart. Not sure if he would make good mod material' date=' but he seems cool enough.[/quote'] Thanks man. Nearly everyone hates me at one point. Then you get to love me. ;] Examples: Static, Frunk, George etc <3 --- Eli: You're really helping people understand that there's some serious issues with the sections that need fixing and that they have a voice and an opinion. Thanks man. George: Watch your tongue please. Don't want pointless arguments. Everyone Who Supports Sartorism: Thanks guys. You can trust me to get stuff done and to never abuse power. If possible, all those who support Sartorism, could you PM me saying why, just so I can make sure you're supporting it for the right reasons, and so I can get a head count =] Everyone Who Insults or Doesn't Support Sartorism Yet: I'm only wanting to help YCM out. I can't do that by banning everyone who disagrees can I? I'll make the site a better place for newbies and experts alike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Best Male 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Eli, please refrain from calling me SD..... eh, i guess I will support itas I did last time but I am not putting the banners in my sig........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgeyboy654 Posted February 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 I'm afraid ash and eli are both undoubtedly correct. This site has major flaws, and we are here to fix them. We are here to help, no more, no less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 I'd like to request the mods keep this open. It is not against any of the forum rules and certainly is not spam. We don't intend to harm the site in any way and all we want is the co-operation of fellow members to ensure that peace is brought back to YCM agreedi would like peaceand it seems to me that Tkill and Kaze are way overstressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 could somone please explain to me exactly what you wanna do and what about this war and what not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 there was no war... there was only a dispute other than that, we are trying to help calm the site down from its impurities... its downsides will be lifted up, due to the fact that we need another mod btw 2400 Posts :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 there was no war... there was only a dispute other than that' date=' we are trying to help calm the site down from its impurities... its downsides will be lifted up, due to the fact that we need another mod btw 2400 Posts :P[/quote'] We need more then 1 Mod Azuh, the Mods are dicussing the matter, but YCMaker has not officially inputted and selected them yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azuh Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 and yet i agree with your terms DJ Sartorism might have been considered bad, the first time round. But this time, we want to help the community... personanlly, we need at least 3 New mods to keep this site in track Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 and yet i agree with your terms DJ Sartorism might have been considered bad' date=' the first time round. But this time, we want to help the community... personanlly, we need at least 3 New mods to keep this site in track[/quote'] We need at least 1 for Custom Cards, 1 certainly for TCG, as of recent days its got a bit edgy, and 1 would be needed for general / Graphics But theres no-use discussing the matter, as The Mods, are already in talks about the matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaco Posted February 10, 2008 Report Share Posted February 10, 2008 Hmmm, is this sort of like Communism, where a country's economy is doing crappy, so they come in offering peace, then end up oppressing? XP Anyways,1. Shenanigans, you use "ignorance is bliss" too much 2. I don't really like the idea of the MetaCG, well, I like the idea, but I don't think it will work. When a noob posts a deck (no offense to noobs) they rarely think it is bad, so they'll probably put it in the section that they think is for the best decks. 3. Try not to use the word "peace" so much, it makes you sound like a cult. This site doesn't get me so stressed out to where I wish for peace here. I'm saying this site isn't that bad. We've just got some new members, it usually evens itself out within a couple weeks. 4. @Chaospudding: Ban all the noobs if they don't shape up in a week? XP 5. Sartorius as mod? uhhh... hmmm... well, I mean, you do have sort of a bad track record. But to tell you the truth, I can't remember much of it ^^ So I regretfully inform you that, for the time being, I am against you becoming a mod. Move me. Make me your brother... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.