Speed Dragon90 Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 You know I just realized how stupid and laughable all these pointless arguements are, it's a CARD GAME PEOPLE! Let's put this in perspective here, this is comparible to tons of people in a dispute about some rule in Monopoly, like someone saying "I think hotels should be banned!" You may say this is different but it's really not all have to say is I can't believe I almost got sucked into an arguement over the rules in a card game, this takes the fun out of it. So my message to all of you is to "GET OUT THERE AND GET A LIFE, IT'S JUST A CARD GAME!" (A kids card game at that). P.SMy apologies if any of you have never played Monopoly, if you haven't played it you won't get the hotel thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 St James Place is overpowered, we banned it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 Park Place is semi-limited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bfmvrocks Posted February 12, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 Stop Spamming. Wow, like I never expected another "Ban this" thread to show up, sure suprised me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 Alright, what is the deal here? Are you saying you would rather not have more discussions? Are you saying that our topics are useless? Because if that is what you are saying, then what is the point of this board? I was under the impression that this board was here to discuss the TCG and, by extension, the OCG. Care to point out how discussing which cards we think should hit the list isn't within the scope of this board? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bfmvrocks Posted February 12, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 I didn't say you can't discuss a card, I'm saying I'm sick of the discussions coming up with a card should be freakin' banned. You say it about every single card in a discussion basically, and it is so stupid if you're getting mad that a card should be banned. You can't make it banned, so your arguments mean nothing at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 I didn't say you can't discuss a card' date=' I'm saying I'm sick of the discussions coming up with a card should be freakin' banned. You say it about every single card in a discussion basically, and it is so stupid if you're getting mad that a card should be banned. You can't make it banned, so your arguments mean nothing at all.[/quote'] Oh no the contrary, the discussions are meant to show why the card should be banned. I don't see any of us cutting ourself because a card is not banned. I'm not mad if the list makers aren't smart enough to ban a certain card. I don't see anyone else mad. It's not like we're saying "ZOMG dis card is banned cuz i dont like it" no we're giving legitamate reasons once the discussion starts. Not to mention the fact that everyone knows they can't make cards banned. The list makers just have to eventually catch on and notice cards are too broken/not very broken and act appropraitely. Sadly, they usually don't realize this for some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shonenhikada Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 I didn't say you can't discuss a card' date=' I'm saying I'm sick of the discussions coming up with a card should be freakin' banned. You say it about every single card in a discussion basically, and it is so stupid if you're getting mad that a card should be banned. You can't make it banned, so your arguments mean nothing at all.[/quote'] Oh no the contrary, the discussions are meant to show why the card should be banned. I don't see any of us cutting ourself because a card is not banned. I'm not mad if the list makers aren't smart enough to ban a certain card. I don't see anyone else mad. It's not like we're saying "ZOMG dis card is banned cuz i dont like it" no we're giving legitamate reasons once the discussion starts. Not to mention the fact that everyone knows they can't make cards banned. The list makers just have to eventually catch on and notice cards are too broken/not very broken and act appropraitely. Sadly, they usually don't realize this for some time. yes your reasons are this, i don't like this card because it's broke,i.e I'm not smart enough to find a way to beat that card so I want it remove from the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 I didn't say you can't discuss a card' date=' I'm saying I'm sick of the discussions coming up with a card should be freakin' banned. You say it about every single card in a discussion basically, and it is so stupid if you're getting mad that a card should be banned. You can't make it banned, so your arguments mean nothing at all.[/quote'] Oh no the contrary, the discussions are meant to show why the card should be banned. I don't see any of us cutting ourself because a card is not banned. I'm not mad if the list makers aren't smart enough to ban a certain card. I don't see anyone else mad. It's not like we're saying "ZOMG dis card is banned cuz i dont like it" no we're giving legitamate reasons once the discussion starts. Not to mention the fact that everyone knows they can't make cards banned. The list makers just have to eventually catch on and notice cards are too broken/not very broken and act appropraitely. Sadly, they usually don't realize this for some time. yes your reasons are this, i don't like this card because it's broke,i.e I'm not smart enough to find a way to beat that card so I want it remove from the game. lolwutno Every card can be beaten. What's important is whether a card is good for ther meta. The Chaos cards can easily be beaten with Bottomless Trap Hole, Solemn Judgment, or the use of Macro decks; that doesn't make them any less banworthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 12, 2008 Report Share Posted February 12, 2008 I didn't say you can't discuss a card' date=' I'm saying I'm sick of the discussions coming up with a card should be freakin' banned. You say it about every single card in a discussion basically, and it is so stupid if you're getting mad that a card should be banned. You can't make it banned, so your arguments mean nothing at all.[/quote'] Oh no the contrary, the discussions are meant to show why the card should be banned. I don't see any of us cutting ourself because a card is not banned. I'm not mad if the list makers aren't smart enough to ban a certain card. I don't see anyone else mad. It's not like we're saying "ZOMG dis card is banned cuz i dont like it" no we're giving legitamate reasons once the discussion starts. Not to mention the fact that everyone knows they can't make cards banned. The list makers just have to eventually catch on and notice cards are too broken/not very broken and act appropraitely. Sadly, they usually don't realize this for some time. yes your reasons are this, i don't like this card because it's broke,i.e I'm not smart enough to find a way to beat that card so I want it remove from the game. D.D. Crow counters Treeborn Frog. I've found a way to beat the card. I still want it prohibited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 13, 2008 Report Share Posted February 13, 2008 Wow, did he actually use the "lol u can counter it" argument? I can counter Raigeki with Magic Jammer. I suppose you want to see that card back in play, now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 13, 2008 Report Share Posted February 13, 2008 I didn't say you can't discuss a card' date=' I'm saying I'm sick of the discussions coming up with a card should be freakin' banned. You say it about every single card in a discussion basically, and it is so stupid if you're getting mad that a card should be banned. You can't make it banned, so your arguments mean nothing at all.[/quote'] Oh no the contrary, the discussions are meant to show why the card should be banned. I don't see any of us cutting ourself because a card is not banned. I'm not mad if the list makers aren't smart enough to ban a certain card. I don't see anyone else mad. It's not like we're saying "ZOMG dis card is banned cuz i dont like it" no we're giving legitamate reasons once the discussion starts. Not to mention the fact that everyone knows they can't make cards banned. The list makers just have to eventually catch on and notice cards are too broken/not very broken and act appropraitely. Sadly, they usually don't realize this for some time. yes your reasons are this, i don't like this card because it's broke,i.e I'm not smart enough to find a way to beat that card so I want it remove from the game. I prefer fun deck types like Exodia, Crystal Beasts, Water Control etc. Why should I be forced to sacrifice main-deck space JUST to counter 1 damn card? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 13, 2008 Report Share Posted February 13, 2008 I didn't say you can't discuss a card' date=' I'm saying I'm sick of the discussions coming up with a card should be freakin' banned. You say it about every single card in a discussion basically, and it is so stupid if you're getting mad that a card should be banned. You can't make it banned, so your arguments mean nothing at all.[/quote'] Oh no the contrary, the discussions are meant to show why the card should be banned. I don't see any of us cutting ourself because a card is not banned. I'm not mad if the list makers aren't smart enough to ban a certain card. I don't see anyone else mad. It's not like we're saying "ZOMG dis card is banned cuz i dont like it" no we're giving legitamate reasons once the discussion starts. Not to mention the fact that everyone knows they can't make cards banned. The list makers just have to eventually catch on and notice cards are too broken/not very broken and act appropraitely. Sadly, they usually don't realize this for some time. yes your reasons are this, i don't like this card because it's broke,i.e I'm not smart enough to find a way to beat that card so I want it remove from the game. I prefer fun deck types like Exodia, Crystal Beasts, Water Control etc. Why should I be forced to sacrifice main-deck space JUST to counter 1 damn card? Because if you are having fun with a children's card game, you deserve to lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bfmvrocks Posted February 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2008 Um, ok then. There should be a sub-board of the "Yugioh TCG" board titled "Banned List Discussion" or something, because all of the topics are getting worse, making more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 15, 2008 Report Share Posted February 15, 2008 oh god NO!!!! if that sub-board is done, it will become "the flame zone" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted February 15, 2008 Report Share Posted February 15, 2008 We need a flame zone, or else were all gonna end up like the attendees at Auschwitz. (I mean no offense to anyone with this statement) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b7hamma Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 Discussion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 wow, i missed this, what happened? anyway i agree if we ban all the good cards we will be back to the era when ATK was all that was there, not so good times. anyway if all the good cards go then the game is over, and then we will go to Magic the Gathering *ya it's that bad* and then that game to will be spoiled by noobs and so on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 The first post would have been much better if it had secretly been a Fresh Prince of Bel Air transition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 Meh, this one isn't as fun, because I didn't make it. And lol@thinking that Graceful Charity wasn't broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 personally i agree thereis really no point in discussing wether a card should or shouldnt be banned, its not like we can do anything about it but then it is nice to get things off out chests and see if people agree although i have seen some pretty strange things to ban such as dmoc and at 1 i think its fine in my oppinion its as if we should just band ALL good cards no no we shouldnt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 although i have seen some pretty strange things to ban such as dmoc and at 1 i think its fine in my oppinion its as if we should just band ALL good cards no no we shouldnt DMoC is abusable to the extent that it ruins the balance of the game whenever it is played. Any card that can do that deserves to be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 DMoC is a 2800 attack floater. How do you NOT see that as broken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 hmmm ok i suppose you have a point but its not soo game breaking you dont get a chance to come back like black luster soldier ect and its effect can only be used once as it gets rfg, plus also its VARY rare so maybe things liek that should come into consideration liek making necroface down to 2 was really pointless who the hell is gonna even have 3 nevermind 1 :S but liek i said you cant ban EVERY good card just liek the treeborn frog thread no it shouodnt be banned =/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted March 17, 2008 Report Share Posted March 17, 2008 hmmm ok i suppose you have a point but its not soo game breaking you dont get a chance to come back like black luster soldier ect and its effect can only be used once as it gets rfg' date=' plus also its VARY rare so maybe things liek that should come into consideration liek making necroface down to 2 was really pointless who the hell is gonna even have 3 nevermind 1 :S but liek i said you cant ban EVERY good card just liek the treeborn frog thread no it shouodnt be banned =/[/quote'] The worth of a card should NEVER be taken into consideration when decided where cards fall on the ban list. And there is a line where "good" becomes "harmful to the game". DMoC has crossed it, and Treeborn is toeing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.