Synchronized Posted August 2, 2011 Report Share Posted August 2, 2011 [center][center][img]http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/8696/3059a.jpg[/img] [/center][/center] [center][center][quote]When your opponent Synchro Summons a Synchro Monster: reveal this card in your hand; negate the Summon of that monster and destroy it. Then, Special Summon this card from your hand. When this card is Special Summoned: Target 1 Synchro Monster in your opponent's Graveyard; this card gains ATK equal to that monster's original ATK. During the End Phase: destroy this card. The effect of "Synchro Hunter" can only be used once per turn.[/quote] [/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted August 2, 2011 Report Share Posted August 2, 2011 Says F*** off to Starfag and NEXUS(I think) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted August 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 2, 2011 [quote name='Ｔｈｅ ｂｌａｚｉｎｇ ＭＡＲＳ' timestamp='1312309886' post='5407885'] Says F*** off to Starfag and NEXUS(I think) [/quote] It's balanced though, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
▪ατємυ▪ Posted August 2, 2011 Report Share Posted August 2, 2011 Yes, very well balanced, great effect. It would most likely be Semi/Limited if it were real. Great work. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted August 2, 2011 Report Share Posted August 2, 2011 kill the synchro, that's good in terms of gaining atk though, yes it only lasts on the field one turn, but I still feel some sort of limit should be placed on that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Time Psyduck Posted August 2, 2011 Report Share Posted August 2, 2011 The limit is that 99% of the time they'll synchro in their own turn, meaning this will mostly do no more than put them off attacking for a turn. It's more a bonus if they try to sync in your turn than a significant part of the effect. Card is good and balanced, and much much much better than that other one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted August 2, 2011 Report Share Posted August 2, 2011 [size=4][i]Wording/Grammar = 8/10[/i] [i]Creativity = 13/20[/i] [i]Balance = 27/30[/i] [i]Viability = 30/40[/i][/size] 78% = B [i]That's a fantastic result. You were only 2% off of the second highest score I have ever given, so you are in the top three. That is something to be proud of, as good results don't come easily from me. Nice job! Now, to the review.[/i] The effect is flawlessly written - there are no errors at all. You are completely up-to-date with the new changes. You only drop marks for not having the Kazuki Takahashi copyright notice, but that's a very minor error. To date you have received the highest mark ever in the Wording & Grammar section. Have a like for breaking the record. In terms of creativity, it has clearly been inspired by cards like Battle Fader and Effect Veiler in that it's an effect monster that plays something like a Quick-Play Spell. However, you have given it a slight twist by giving it a Gorz-like quality - it activates and summons itself, providing a useful beatstick and some potential Xyz or Synchro Material. A small twist, but a decent one, gives you an above average mark in the Creativity section. In terms of balance, you could not have been better. You really hit the nail on the head - the card is incredibly close to perfect. I have no qualms about its power levels, but I can see why some would argue that it is overpowered. You achieve a great mark in the Balance section for that. On to viability - this would be a nice little tech card. It fits its niche very well and the beatstickiness and material fodder it provides are useful abilities indeed. I can't see it being a staple at all but it does its job very well and is a runnable card. It's hardly a staple, but it comes agonizingly close. Well done, you get a pretty decent mark. Overall I can't see many flaws. For you it would be not about ironing out mistakes - you are technically perfect when it comes to OCG and realism. I would tell you to think harder when designing cards. You will generate more ideas - the only area that you were lacking here was creativity, and even that was above average. You need to dream up more inspiring concepts and build on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 [quote name='Dт. Михаи́л Ботви́нник PчD' timestamp='1312321022' post='5408512'] [size=4][i]Wording/Grammar = 8/10[/i][/size] [i]Creativity = 13/20[/i] [i]Balance = 27/30[/i] [i]Viability = 30/40[/i] 78% = B [i]That's a fantastic result. You were only 2% off of the second highest score I have ever given, so you are in the top three. That is something to be proud of, as good results don't come easily from me. Nice job! Now, to the review.[/i] The effect is flawlessly written - there are no errors at all. You are completely up-to-date with the new changes. You only drop marks for not having the Kazuki Takahashi copyright notice, but that's a very minor error. To date you have received the highest mark ever in the Wording & Grammar section. Have a like for breaking the record. In terms of creativity, it has clearly been inspired by cards like Battle Fader and Effect Veiler in that it's an effect monster that plays something like a Quick-Play Spell. However, you have given it a slight twist by giving it a Gorz-like quality - it activates and summons itself, providing a useful beatstick and some potential Xyz or Synchro Material. A small twist, but a decent one, gives you an above average mark in the Creativity section. In terms of balance, you could not have been better. You really hit the nail on the head - the card is incredibly close to perfect. I have no qualms about its power levels, but I can see why some would argue that it is overpowered. You achieve a great mark in the Balance section for that. On to viability - this would be a nice little tech card. It fits its niche very well and the beatstickiness and material fodder it provides are useful abilities indeed. I can't see it being a staple at all but it does its job very well and is a runnable card. It's hardly a staple, but it comes agonizingly close. Well done, you get a pretty decent mark. Overall I can't see many flaws. For you it would be not about ironing out mistakes - you are technically perfect when it comes to OCG and realism. I would tell you to think harder when designing cards. You will generate more ideas - the only area that you were lacking here was creativity, and even that was above average. You need to dream up more inspiring concepts and build on them. [/quote] You sounded like...An estate agent there for some reason XD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 So this is one of my images and what it was used to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 [quote name='Dт. Михаи́л Ботви́нник PчD' timestamp='1312321022' post='5408512'] [size=4][i]Wording/Grammar = 8/10[/i][/size] [i]Creativity = 13/20[/i] [i]Balance = 27/30[/i] [i]Viability = 30/40[/i] 78% = B [i]That's a fantastic result. You were only 2% off of the second highest score I have ever given, so you are in the top three. That is something to be proud of, as good results don't come easily from me. Nice job! Now, to the review.[/i] The effect is flawlessly written - there are no errors at all. You are completely up-to-date with the new changes. You only drop marks for not having [b]the Kazuki Takahashi copyright notice[/b], but that's a very minor error. To date you have received the highest mark ever in the Wording & Grammar section. Have a like for breaking the record. In terms of creativity, it has clearly been inspired by cards like Battle Fader and Effect Veiler in that it's an effect monster that plays something like a Quick-Play Spell. However, you have given it a slight twist by giving it a Gorz-like quality - it activates and summons itself, providing a useful beatstick and some potential Xyz or Synchro Material. A small twist, but a decent one, gives you an above average mark in the Creativity section. In terms of balance, you could not have been better. You really hit the nail on the head - the card is incredibly close to perfect. I have no qualms about its power levels, but I can see why some would argue that it is overpowered. You achieve a great mark in the Balance section for that. On to viability - this would be a nice little tech card. It fits its niche very well and the beatstickiness and material fodder it provides are useful abilities indeed. I can't see it being a staple at all but it does its job very well and is a runnable card. It's hardly a staple, but it comes agonizingly close. Well done, you get a pretty decent mark. Overall I can't see many flaws. For you it would be not about ironing out mistakes - you are technically perfect when it comes to OCG and realism. I would tell you to think harder when designing cards. You will generate more ideas - the only area that you were lacking here was creativity, and even that was above average. You need to dream up more inspiring concepts and build on them. [/quote] When has the bold been mandated in RC? I believe never. Anyway, my turn to rate. OCG has a minor flaw. You are supposed to capitalize the first letter after the colons. Great negation. It can punish your opponent if they try to use Formula's effect during your turn. Can't really be used in every Deck since some Decks won't have Synchros. Name and image are well suiting for what you were going for. For creativity, I believe if you can string more ideas, you would become great! Overall, above the current average of 43/50. Playability: 8/10 OCG: 9/10 Balance: 9/10 Creativity: 8/10 Name: 5/5 Pic: 5/5 Total: 44/50 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synchronized Posted August 3, 2011 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 I thought so, but if you read Konami's version of Seven Tools of the Bandit, the "negate" after the colon isn't capitalized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 [quote name='Vanquishing Light' timestamp='1312348583' post='5409575'] I thought so, but if you read Konami's version of Seven Tools of the Bandit, the "negate" after the colon isn't capitalized. [/quote] That is a semi-colon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mehmani Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 [quote name='Ｔｈｅ ｂｌａｚｉｎｇ ＭＡＲＳ' timestamp='1312336606' post='5409213'] You sounded like...An estate agent there for some reason XD [/quote] Don't worry about it, I'm just stereotypically English. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon7OP Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 It works rather well, especially since it only sticks around for one turn. I can't see any major problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted August 3, 2011 Report Share Posted August 3, 2011 Great card. Xyz needs something that can put them above the Synchros. As fast as Synchro's are, this isn't overpowered at all, and underpowered is FAR out of the question. 10/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.