Jump to content

Lock


RedRuler

Recommended Posts

First 1 on 1 in months.

 

Rules:

-All YCM rules apply.

-Only a 3 stars or higher member can challenge me.

 

Cards Requirements:

-It must have a lore.

-No joke cards.

-Make a Monster Card whose effect resolves around Equip Cards.

 

To Win:

-First to get 3 votes wins.

 

FOR VOTERS:

You must give a valid reason to vote, you cannot vote based on the picture, name, etc.

 

Mr. Striker Card:

128884.jpg

Lore:

1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monsters

Once per turn: You can target 1 face-up Synchro or Xyz Monster on the field; Equip that target to this card as an Equip Card (Max. 1). While equipped with a monster by this effect: This card cannot be destroyed by battle. If this card would leave the field by a card effect: You can Special Summon the monster equipped by this card's effect to its owner's side of the field instead.

 

 

 

My Card:

 

 

 

282735.jpg

Lore:

This card cannot be Special Summoned or Set. Once per turn: You can send 1 face-up Equip Card you control to the Graveyard; Special Summon 1 Level 4 or lower Warrior-type monster from the Graveyard. That monster cannot attack during this turn. When this card is destroyed and sent to the Graveyard: Destroy all face-up monsters on the field. Then return a number of Equip Spell Cards from the Gaveyard to your Deck equal to or less than the number of Monster Cards destroyed by this effect.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mr. Striker

 

That is spamming. This is a 1 on 1 contest, if you want to post here, vote for 1 card.

 

And read the rules of the forum, please.

 

He was already reported by me. Now, let us move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

smuoo has received a warning for spamming.

 

The Manipulative One reminds me of the Machine Emperors (Meklord is a stupid name), and I like that it can equip monsters on either side of the field, including Xyzs. The only downside is that all that happens once it's equipped with a monster is being indestructible. Its method of saving itself is nice.

 

Doom Knight actually relies on Equip cards in a more old-fashioned way, and I thought that Equip cards like that don't see much play anymore. I get that it's the theme of this contest, but try and play around with the concept. The "Cannot be Special Summoned" clause seems to balance out the destruction effect.

 

While Striker played with the concept, I think HadesRuler's card gave them more uses other than minor invincibility, so I vote for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Mr. Striker

smuoo has received a warning for spamming.

 

The Manipulative One reminds me of the Machine Emperors (Meklord is a stupid name), and I like that it can equip monsters on either side of the field, including Xyzs. The only downside is that all that happens once it's equipped with a monster is being indestructible. Its method of saving itself is nice.

 

Doom Knight actually relies on Equip cards in a more old-fashioned way, and I thought that Equip cards like that don't see much play anymore. I get that it's the theme of this contest, but try and play around with the concept. The "Cannot be Special Summoned" clause seems to balance out the destruction effect.

 

While Striker played with the concept, I think HadesRuler's card gave them more uses other than minor invincibility, so I vote for him.

 

Alright then Roxas. I was debating ATK gain or indestructibility.

1-0 Hades

Link to comment
Share on other sites

smuoo has received a warning for spamming.

 

The Manipulative One reminds me of the Machine Emperors (Meklord is a stupid name), and I like that it can equip monsters on either side of the field, including Xyzs. The only downside is that all that happens once it's equipped with a monster is being indestructible. Its method of saving itself is nice.

 

Doom Knight actually relies on Equip cards in a more old-fashioned way, and I thought that Equip cards like that don't see much play anymore. I get that it's the theme of this contest, but try and play around with the concept. The "Cannot be Special Summoned" clause seems to balance out the destruction effect.

 

While Striker played with the concept, I think HadesRuler's card gave them more uses other than minor invincibility, so I vote for him.

 

Thanks for the vote.

 

Keep voting people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...