Marco Polo Posted September 2, 2011 Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 Judas' template this time, for short temporary time. This time, I was overwhelmed by my desire to make the strongest level 4 monster (ATK wise.) full of drawbacks. [img]http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/1193/jesterelsphag.png[/img] [size=6][size=4][Spoiler=Details][/size]Jester Elsphag[/size] [size=6][[img]http://images.wikia.com/ycm/images/0/0e/Dark.png[/img][/size][size=6]][/size] [img]http://cdn2.staztic.com/logos/yugioh-tool-16.png[/img][img]http://cdn2.staztic.com/logos/yugioh-tool-16.png[/img][img]http://cdn2.staztic.com/logos/yugioh-tool-16.png[/img][img]http://cdn2.staztic.com/logos/yugioh-tool-16.png[/img] [b][ Fiend / Effect ][/b] This card cannot be used as a Synchro Material or an XYZ Material. This card cannot be Tributed. When your opponent would take damage from anything involving this card, take the same amount of damage instead. If this card was sent to the Graveyard, you can Special Summon it to your opponent's field to add 1 "Jester Elsphag" from your Deck to your hand. When this card battles a monster, you can discard 1 card to increase it's ATK by 200. [b]ATK/ 2400 DEF/ 1800[/b] [b][/Spoiler][/b] Forbidden Chalice however makes it a 2800 ATK beatstick with no drawbacks. I think I shall add a line in which this card's not affected by your Spell or Traps, so for a while just ignore this card's pros when combined with Lance or Chalice. I'm starting another single card trilogy, this time I'll concentrate on making some stuff with monsters that their presence is a drawback (mostly). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Polo Posted September 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cocodomoco Posted September 2, 2011 Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 i like the card you always have good images to. so wait ur starting a trilogy meaning your going to make 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Polo Posted September 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 Yup. another 2 cards with the same theme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecha Love Posted September 2, 2011 Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 LOL. XYZ is an archtype. For the OCG XYZ is written Xyz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Polo Posted September 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 Yup, I know. I noticed after uploading. and XYZ isn't an archtype if I'm not writing it as ("XYZ"). It also would've have came with the word material after it. You should've known that, atleast. If you nothing smarter than pointing out the obvious, don't post and save wasted time I spend upon answering you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alice Moonflowyr Posted September 2, 2011 Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 Umm...correct OCG IS Xyz. Not like Kaibas stupid XYZ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simping For Hina Posted September 2, 2011 Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 Xyz is a subtype. :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecha Love Posted September 2, 2011 Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 1) XYZ is in fact an archetype, and although you did not write "XYZ" as you showed; many cardmakers have written it as such. I was pointing out a fact. 2) I did know that, however if you see above, the explanation is clear, and I do make cards as well you know. To which my OCG was fine when being used in such situations. 3) And how was I to know you knew?! If you are going to put me down as an idiot, then tell me you know by correecting it! Just putting I know, WITHOUT actually doing it or giving any sign of knowing, then I must assume you did not know. 4) Oh sorry my lord. Time is so precious that you cannot answer a post with perfectly normal criticism. 5) Also another problem. Here is what will happen: - Your opponent shall attack and destroy your Jester one way or another. -He/She will claim your Jester, while you SS another one. -Your opponent shall then attack again, destroying your new Jester. -They claim that one too and you get another. -They attack again, ending up with 3 Jester's providing they have enough cards in their hand. -Problem? = Why would you want to summon another if this will keep happening? =My suggestion: End the BP, Negate the effects of the Jester your opponent summoned etc etc. 5) Goodbye. I shall save your time by leaving. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marco Polo Posted September 2, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 [quote name='Elemental Dragon' timestamp='1314989003' post='5486877'] 4) Oh sorry my lord. Time is so precious that you cannot answer a post with perfectly normal criticism. [/quote] Yup, I'll quote: "LOL. XYZ is an archtype. For the OCG XYZ is written Xyz " Lawl. [size=1][size=3]Anyways, can you move on? it being Xyz which is just capitalized letter is minor[/size], and I'm also happy to see Daemon joined the convesation, Hai, didn't you feel like entering before the XYZ-Xyz spam started? oh right.. you're not trying to give any feedback other than being a background voice.[/size] The second jester should've got into the opponent's field in the End Phase, that was my intention, I clearly did not mention it though. Anyone else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mecha Love Posted September 2, 2011 Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 That XYZ-Xyz spam has ended. If you'd read the rest of my post..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.