.Nu-13 Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 [center][img]http://img847.imageshack.us/img847/804/161805.jpg[/img] [b]Errata: Actiavte this card only if you control 2 or more monsters. Each player targets 1 monster they control: Destroy all monsters on the field, except the targets.[/b][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoaringSilence0 Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 NICE AGAIN! 10/10! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 lolinnistrad. When you directly transfer it into YGO, it's all broken. It's shouting OTK to me, target your Judgment Dragon, DAD, whatever. Or let Sangan be destroyed after you declare first turn Tour Guide. Get Veiler or something. Or just have 1 monster on the field :< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted September 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 [quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1315247055' post='5494110'] lolinnistrad. [/quote] >3 [quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1315247055' post='5494110'] When you directly transfer it into YGO, it's all broken. It's shouting OTK to me, target your Judgment Dragon, DAD, whatever. Or let Sangan be destroyed after you declare first turn Tour Guide. Get Veiler or something. Or just have 1 monster on the field :< [/quote] Add a clause that allows this to activate only if you have 2 or more monsters on field? ...be glad I didn't give it flashback >3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 God no. Yeah, a restriction clause would help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoaringSilence0 Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 I guess this could be good for you, so it'd be probably have to be Limited if you leave it the way it is... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 [quote name='Noel Vermillion' timestamp='1315247120' post='5494112'] >3 Add a clause that allows this to activate only if you have 2 or more monsters on field? ...be glad I didn't give it flashback >3 [/quote] ohu >3 Card is very boss. But it's worse than Dark Hole, so I suppose it's acceptable :3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted September 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 Errata'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathanael D. Striker Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 Where is this spree of genius coming from? This can see some abuse (coughSangancoughTengucough), yet it does get you out of a pickle. I have no problems with it except for the abuse it can do. Playability: 9.5/10 OCG: 10/10 Balance: 9/10 Creativity: 9.5/10 Name: 5/5 Pic: 5/5 total: 48/50 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Nu-13 Posted September 5, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 [quote name='Mr. Striker' timestamp='1315247286' post='5494124'] Where is this spree of genius coming from? [/quote] ...secret >3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 It's a slightly Weaker Dark Hole. I see no real problems with it Maybe activate when your opponent controls more Monsters when you do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Therrion Posted September 5, 2011 Report Share Posted September 5, 2011 [center][center]Very nice card. Cursed already said the MTG correlation >,>[/center][/center] [center][center]Basicly of weak Dark Hole, as said.[/center][/center] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Did Quick Play makes this card broken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.