[Striker] Admiral Darkside

[Nathanael D. Striker]

[spoiler=Info about the card]Inspiration for this card came from the ruling that Tokens cannot be used as Xyz Material. To combat this, I gave them the right to be treated as Normal Monsters, which screws said ruling. There are two ways to use this card. One involves keeping this on the field. The other involves sending it to the Graveyard, much like "Dandylion", yet it doesn't include sending it from the Deck for obvious reasons. I hope you enjoy this since this is me experimenting a bit.

NOTE: The card is not justified for a reason.[/spoiler]

[img]http://i55.tinypic.com/2hnal21.jpg[/img]
[i]While this card is face-up on the field: Tokens can be used as Xyz Materials. When a Token is used for a Xyz Summon: You can destroy Spell/Trap cards up to the number of Tokens used. When this card is sent to the Graveyard, excluding the Deck: Special Summon 2 "Darkside Tokens" (Warrior-Type/DARK/Level 3/ATK 0/DEF 0). The Summoned Tokens can be used as Xyz Materials.[/i]

Anyway, CnC?

[Kyng's Old Account]

Don't you need to credit Daemon for the image? You know, since it is his and all.

[Nathanael D. Striker]

Good point. Forgot how to do that with MSE.

[.Nu-13]

There's a flaw in your logic. Tokens ARE treated as Normal Monsters by game mechanics. As Tokens are NOT physical cards, there's NO way to use them for Xyz, even with a card effect.

[Nathanael D. Striker]

[quote name='Noel Vermillion' timestamp='1315770995' post='5507762']
There's a flaw in your logic. Tokens ARE treated as Normal Monsters by game mechanics. As Tokens are NOT physical cards, there's NO way to use them for Xyz, even with a card effect.
[/quote]

That screws everything up. The idea looked good on paper. Well, I may just have to screw the mechanic a bit.

[.Nu-13]

[quote name='Mr. Striker' timestamp='1315771211' post='5507772']
That screws everything up. The idea looked good on paper. Well, I may just have to screw the mechanic a bit.
[/quote]
Cards that screw over ENTIRE MECHANICS can't be considered realistic IMO

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

[quote name='Noel Vermillion' timestamp='1315771254' post='5507776']
Cards that screw over ENTIRE MECHANICS can't be considered realistic IMO
[/quote]
Gottoms? *shot*

[Nathanael D. Striker]

[quote name='Noel Vermillion' timestamp='1315771254' post='5507776']
Cards that screw over ENTIRE MECHANICS can't be considered realistic IMO
[/quote]

Red Nova? *shot*

[.Rai]

[quote]When this card is sent to the Graveyard: Special Summon 2 "Darkside Tokens" (Warrior-Type/DARK/Level 3/ATK 0/DEF 0).[/quote]

Wat.

> Dandylion effect.
> Dandylion is Limited.
> I can have 4 copies of Dandylion

[.Nu-13]

Errata: Cards that screw over non-physical entities can't be realistic

If someone uses a coin for a Token, you expect them to overlay 2 coins? That's why Tokens can't be used for Xyz, as pretty much, they're not cards.

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

[quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1315771493' post='5507784']

Wat.

> Dandylion effect.
> Dandylion is Limited.
> I can have 4 copies of Dandylion
[/quote]
WHY THE F*CK DO YOU KEEP SAYING THIS

DANDYLION IS LIMITED DUE TO ABUSE WITH CARDS LIKE DEBRIS

THIS DAMN THING ISN'T EVEN SEARCHABLE

[Nathanael D. Striker]

[quote name='Cursed Reaction' timestamp='1315771493' post='5507784']

Wat.

> Dandylion effect.
> Dandylion is Limited.
> I can have 4 copies of Dandylion
[/quote]

I may have asked for too much. Exclude the Deck?

@Mirror: It avoided Sangan fun by 100. Should I allow Sangan fun?
@Noel: I'm being too optimistic with this card. Like I said, on paper it works.

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

No, it's fine that way. i'm just facepalming that apparently everything that summons tokens like Dandylion does is broken sh*t.

[.Rai]

[quote name='Miror B.' timestamp='1315771574' post='5507792']
WHY THE F*CK DO YOU KEEP SAYING THIS

DANDYLION IS LIMITED DUE TO ABUSE WITH CARDS LIKE DEBRIS

THIS DAMN THING ISN'T EVEN SEARCHABLE
[/quote]


> Is DARK
> Is Warrior
> Is Summoner Monk-able

Dandylion, yes, is abusable with Debris but that doesn't mean this isn't broken still :/


[quote name='Mr. Striker' timestamp='1315771576' post='5507793']

I may have asked for too much. Exclude the Deck?
[/quote]

Yes.

[Nathanael D. Striker]

Changes have been taken to consideration. I'm surprised that this has so many posts already.

[ragnarok1945]

well for the 1st part of the effect it should be fine since it's to both sides of the field

for the last part with the 2 tokens though, I'd give one token to your side, and one to your opponent's side