NEX

[CDDRodrigo]

Neo-Spacian Extent.

[url="http://images.wikia.com/yugioh/images/3/39/NEXTAEV-EN-C-1E.jpg"][img]http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070906023705/yugioh/images/thumb/3/39/NEXTAEV-EN-C-1E.jpg/300px-NEXTAEV-EN-C-1E.jpg[/img][/url]

In this pic, Glow Moss is f***ing Dark Panther.

[This Account is Unplayable]

If only more targets were released.

[.Nu-13]

...thanks for the picture

OT: Wish they expanded the concept

[Kingdom Xathers]

[quote name='Noel Vermillion' timestamp='1316642665' post='5531409']
OT: Wish they expanded the concept
[/quote]

I was actually going to say the same thing...

The concept would have been great if expanded. Only problem I see would be Grand Mole's NEX'd version, only because of the "Harpie Lady Syndrome" that would affect him (Grand is still @1, both in Advanced and Traditional. Sure, they could print NEX Grand Mole, but the inability to use it would make me sad. :-[ )




... And for a bit of slight-off-topic, I had sent Konami an idea for Dark Panther's NEX form.

... Of course, had I known beforehand that they don't accept ideas from "the public", I would not have even bothered.... TT__TT

[Blake]

GRAND MOLE is @1. Nex Grand Mole wouldn' be >>;

[CDDRodrigo]

[quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1316643474' post='5531428']
GRAND MOLE is @1. Nex Grand Mole wouldn' be >>;
[/quote]

They have the same name.

You would be able to run either 1 or the other.

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

I would think you'd be allowed to run 2 of the NEX mole since it isn't actually limited. You just couldn't run 3 NEX mole and 1 Grand Mole.

[Kingdom Xathers]

[quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1316643474' post='5531428']
GRAND MOLE is @1. Nex Grand Mole wouldn' be >>;
[/quote]

Except that all NEX Neo-Spacians (and by "all", I mean "the two that currently exist") have their names treated as their original counterpart, even in the Extra Deck.

[Blake]

TREATED AS. They are not the same card.

[Ieyasu Tokugawa]

[quote name='KingdomHeartsKeeper' timestamp='1316643777' post='5531440']
Except that all NEX Neo-Spacians (and by "all", I mean "the two that currently exist") have their names treated as their original counterpart, even in the Extra Deck.
[/quote]
Except all the name dictates is that you cannot have more than 3 in combination in the deck. Grand Mole is limited, NEX mole would not be, so even if Grand Mole is limited, NEX mole does not have to abide by the limit and can still be run.

[Kingdom Xathers]

Okay, I dunno if this ruling is still official, but maybe this will help clear up what I'm trying to say here:

[quote]"Neo-Spacian Marine Dolphin" is treated as "Neo-Spacian Aqua Dolphin" for purposes of Deck construction. So, you can have a combined total of thee copies of this card and "Neo-Spacian Aqua Dolphin" in your Main Deck and Side Deck. If you have 2 copies of "Neo-Spacian Aqua Dolphin" in your [b]Main Deck[/b], you can only have 1 copy of "Neo-Spacian Marine Dolphin" in your [b]Fusion Deck[/b].[/quote]

... In theory, this would apply to all NEX-Spacians. But, again, it appears this ruling may no longer be official....

[Blake]

... Duh, we know that, everyone does.

But they aren't the same CARD. The CARD Neo-Spacian Grand Mole is limited, not the NAME.

[CDDRodrigo]

Hm, good to know.

So that thing wouldn't be an issue.

[evilfusion]

It's the same thing as Harpie Lady 1/2/3 and A Legendary Ocean. The name is what determines deck construction rules. The banlist counts all cards of that name. So, if all NEX Spacians have the text "this card's name is treated as X..." without specifying on the field or similar, then it counts as that in the deck, which is why Grand Mole's NEX form wont be made, unless they say "while on the field" or something (which frankly, all of them should have said).

[Blake]

[quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1316666191' post='5532297']
It's the same thing as Harpie Lady 1/2/3 and A Legendary Ocean. The name is what determines deck construction rules. The banlist counts all cards of that name. So, if all NEX Spacians have the text "this card's name is treated as X..." without specifying on the field or similar, then it counts as that in the deck, which is why Grand Mole's NEX form wont be made, unless they say "while on the field" or something (which frankly, all of them should have said).
[/quote]
But no card like that has ever been limited, so how would we know?

I mean, it makes no sense that you couldn't have 1 Grand Mole and 1 NEX Mole. Nex Mole shares a NAME but is NOT the same card.

[Toffee.]

NEX Mole -> One-sided bounce
NEX Scarab -> More ATK for every card on the field
NEX Panther -> Can copy any monster effect on the field.
NEX Hummingbird -> Gains a lot more MP

....
And I dont even want to start with the NEX-Neos forms, because those will just be ridiculous.

[NumberCruncher]

Would be good if not for the bolded parts of the effect.

Send 1 face-up [b]"Neo-Spacian"[/b] monster [b]you control [/b]to the Graveyard. Special Summon 1 [b]Level 4[/b] monster[b] with the same name[/b] from your Extra Deck.

[evilfusion]

[quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1316666406' post='5532300']
But no card like that has ever been limited, so how would we know?

I mean, it makes no sense that you couldn't have 1 Grand Mole and 1 NEX Mole. Nex Mole shares a NAME but is NOT the same card.
[/quote]

If that was true, why can't we have more than 3 Harpie Lady because Harpie Lady 1, 2, 3, and Cyber Harpie share a NAME but is NOT the same card.

The banlist is the exact same as the "3 per deck" rule, except it's less than 3.

We always known when card design is BAD when it shares a name with another card, but not only when it's on the field (Harpie Queen, Proto Cyber) or Graveyard (Cyber Zwei)

[Toffee.]

This topic obligated me to make a Written Cards topic.

[CDDRodrigo]

[quote name='Armadilloz' timestamp='1316669467' post='5532357']
This topic obligated me to make a Written Cards topic.
[/quote]

Good to serve as inpiration.

And they really should've expanded the concept indeed.