Tiger Deck, one more time

[SynjoDeonecros]

Monsters

14

• King Tiger Wanghu x3
  
• Photon Sabre Tiger x3
  
• Soul Tiger x3
  
• The All-Seeing White Tiger x3
  
• Crystal Beast Topaz Tiger x2
  

Side Deck

• X-Saber Airbellum x1
  
• Key Mouse x2
  
• Super-Nimble Mega Hamster x2
  

[spells

12

• Burden of the Mighty x3
  
• Mystical Space Typhoon x2
  
• Offerings to the Doomed x2
  
• Pot of Avarice x1
  
• Spiritual Forest x2
  
• Pot of Duality x2
  

Side Deck

• Closed Forest x2
  
• Heavy Storm x1
  
• Dark Hole x1
  
• Monster Reborn x1
  

[Traps

14

• Dark Bribe x2
  
• Horn of the Phantom Beast x3
  
• Super Rush Recklessly x3
  
• Beast Rising x2
  
• Bottomless Trap Hole x2
  
• Solemn Warning x2
  

Side Deck

• Skill Drain x2
  
• Trap Stun x2
  
• Torrential Tribute x1
  

Okay, people, since you guys refuse to listen, here's exactly what I'm asking for with this deck, and what I am not going to tolerate:

 

1. Offerings, SRR, and Beast Rising STAY, period. I find Offerings way too versatile to drop, and I haven't gotten gypped by its side effect once, yet; SRR has saved my ass too many times for me to drop to below 2, and Beast Rising I've managed to use to superior effect to crush my opponent. I'm not going to remove them, period.

 

2. "Staples" like Dark Hole, Heavy Storm, etc. I have NOT needed in this deck AT ALL, and thus I see no reason to put them in this deck.

 

3. Rescue Rabbit, while useful in this deck, is just way too expensive for me to get, so unless it gets reprinted or drops dramatically in price, don't suggest it.

 

4. My side deck is variable, so any suggestions on adding to that is fine.

 

5. Horn of the Phantom Beast is at 3 and Solemn Warning is at 2 in this deck (though I have Sakuretsu Armor in this deck IRL, because I don't have Warning), so don't suggest I put them in, because they're already there.

 

6. I AM willing to step outside the Tiger theme, but not outside the Beast/Beast-Warrior theme, so make sure you keep that in mind when posting.

 

7. I don't care for tournament decks, so anything along the lines of "Play T.G.s, etc" will be ignored. I want suggestions on how to improve THIS particular deck, not what deck you think I can win Regionals with.

 

8. Anything else suggested is fair game, and I WILL listen to it. If any of the other points is breached, though, I will ignore you, period.

[Legend Zero]

Because I don't want to spend 20 mins pointing out how your logic is completely flawed....

 

Reborn Tengu + T.G.s = best Beast (Warriors).dek

[SynjoDeonecros]

Don't have the cards for a T.G. deck, and I don't play tournament elitist decks, anyway. Maybe I should've stated that in my original post, as well.

[Legend Zero]

Don't have the cards for a T.G. deck, and I don't play tournament elitist decks, anyway. Maybe I should've stated that in my original post, as well.

Maybe you shouldn't have so many restrictions. =/

[Resident Fascist]

 

-2 Spiritual Forest

+1 Monster Reborn

+1 Dark Hole

 

-2 Offer

-1 Burden

 

+3 Reborn Tengu

 

-2 Beast Rising

-1 Rush

 

+3 Horn of the Phantom Beast

[SynjoDeonecros]

I put restrictions there because otherwise, people don't listen when I explain why I refuse a suggestion. This way, I can get everything out at once and if they refuse to listen (like Shard did just now), it's not my fault.

 

Now, that doesn't mean that I'm against suggestions; I'm honestly not sure on the monster lineup for this deck, for instance, but when I put my foot down on something I expect the suggester to acknowledge and respect that, not pester me to change my mind on it.

[Resident Fascist]

I put restrictions there because otherwise, people don't listen when I explain why I refuse a suggestion.

 

I'm going to refuse suggestions to put cards that cost £1 each into my deck and actually make it better and continue to run crap! It's not hard to run staples. They're staples for a reason. If you're not even gonna bother to listen to our advice, what's the point?

[Legend Zero]

But there isn't really anything to suggest. You want your deck to be better, yet every good card suggested is assumed "elitist". I followed your (semi-insane) rules and made an appropriate fix. You then go add another rule that makes my fixes invalid? There is a difference between elitist and good, I suggest you learn it.

[SynjoDeonecros]

That's not true; as I said, I'm looking to upgrade my monster lineup, and I haven't put any restrictions on THAT, yet, so you can make suggestions on that. It's just the "staples" that I'm saying no to, because I honestly have not had any need for any of them in any of my decks.

 

But if that's what you want to believe, then you don't have to post, anymore.

[Resident Fascist]

That's not true; as I said, I'm looking to upgrade my monster lineup, and I haven't put any restrictions on THAT, yet, so you can make suggestions on that. It's just the "staples" that I'm saying no to, because I honestly have not had any need for any of them in any of my decks.

 

But if that's what you want to believe, then you don't have to post, anymore.

 

But you should be running staples because they make your deck better.

 

durrrrrrrrrrrrrr

[Legend Zero]

That's not true; as I said, I'm looking to upgrade my monster lineup, and I haven't put any restrictions on THAT, yet, so you can make suggestions on that. It's just the "staples" that I'm saying no to, because I honestly have not had any need for any of them in any of my decks.

 

But if that's what you want to believe, then you don't have to post, anymore.

Then how come T.G. and Reborn Tengu was ignored? Their monsters form a perfectly good engine and Tengu itself is amazing, plus they are horn targets. I don't understand your logic.

[Astolfo]

Y U NO SMARTER? Seriously, no staples? And Y U USE BAD CARDS?

[Resident Fascist]

Then how come T.G. and Reborn Tengu was ignored? Their monsters form a perfectly good engine and Tengu itself is amazing, plus they are horn targets. I don't understand your logic.

 

Because he's bad?

[Guest Dante v. Nero]

This is funny.

 

-1 All-Seeing

-2 Bottomless

 

+1 MST

+2 T.G. Roflwolf

 

Why are you concerned about cost when you could easily go on DN?

[Resident Fascist]

Why are you concerned about cost when you could easily go on DN?

 

In fact his original screenshot from the last thread was on DN. I think he's an idiot. And look how he's fled the thread like a pussy because he can't take advice.

[Guest ~King Crouton~]

Try this.

 

 

Or Daemon's...

 

[Resident Fascist]

I doubt he'll view this topic again, to be honest.

[byak]

i guess you play the all seeing white tiger because it is all seeing.

[Resident Fascist]

i guess you play the all seeing white tiger because it is all seeing.

 

No he plays it because rescue rabbit

[Guest Dante v. Nero]

i guess you play the all seeing white tiger because it is all seeing.

 

But he couldn't "see" that his Deck sucked.

[Resident Fascist]

Anyway let's just lock this topic because it sucks

[Yankee]

Posting this three times...each time not learning anything.

 

-_-

[Guest PikaPerson01]

No he plays it because rescue rabbit

He doesn't play Rescue Rabbit in this deck.

 

On-topic though:

 

1. Offerings, SRR, and Beast Rising STAY, period.

This is the kind of bullshit attitude that got your previous 3 or so topics locked.

 

Please read the rules:

 

9. The Jack Witt Clause

 

All deck topics are treated as rate and fix topics. This means that, when you post your deck, you will receive comments and evaluations of the deck's quality from other members and suggestions as to how to improve it. If you cannot deal with this, then do not post your deck. If you post your deck and then show that you cannot or will not accept constructive criticism, you will not only appear childish but also run the risk of having your topics closed.