wiithepeople Posted December 5, 2011 Report Share Posted December 5, 2011 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1323122543' post='5689012'] I expect something like Biting Shark Dragon. Oh wait, that'd sound cool... [/quote] Too bad Black Man Eating Shark is already taken (Konami was so racist). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Void Posted December 5, 2011 Report Share Posted December 5, 2011 "No.32 海咬竜シャーク ドレイク Nanbaazu 32 Kaikouryuu Shaaku Doreiku (Number 32: Sea Biting Dragon Shark Drake) Rank 4/WATER/Sea Serpent-Type - Effect, Xyz/2800 ATK/2100 DEF 3 Level 4 Monsters. This card cannot be destroyed by battle, except with a "Number" monster. Once per turn, when this card destroys an opponent's monster by battle: You can detach an Xyz Material from this card. Special Summon that monster from your opponent's Graveyard to your opponent's side of the field. That monster loses 1000 ATK. Then, battle a monster Special Summoned by this card's effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted December 5, 2011 Report Share Posted December 5, 2011 [quote name='Fire King Hi-Oh' timestamp='1323126747' post='5689208'] "No.32 海咬竜シャーク ドレイク Nanbaazu 32 Kaikouryuu Shaaku Doreiku (Number 32: Sea Biting Dragon Shark Drake) Rank 4/WATER/Sea Serpent-Type - Effect, Xyz/2800 ATK/2100 DEF 3 Level 4 Monsters. This card cannot be destroyed by battle, except with a "Number" monster. Once per turn, when this card destroys an opponent's monster by battle: You can detach an Xyz Material from this card. Special Summon that monster from your opponent's Graveyard to your opponent's side of the field. That monster loses 1000 ATK. [b]Then, battle a monster Special Summoned by this card's effect[/b]. [/quote] inb4ejaculation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathSDelano Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 Can't tell do you pick the position the monster is Special Summoned in or does your opponent as its being Special Summoned to there field O.o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 I thought the effect stated it's SSed in ATK Posiiton. If not, it's your Effect, so you'd pick the Battle Position. I'm not sure why you'd SS it in Defense, considering you already destroyed that monster once, and get the chance to battle it again with 1000 less ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathSDelano Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1323130925' post='5689428'] I thought the effect stated it's SSed in ATK Posiiton. If not, it's your Effect, so you'd pick the Battle Position. I'm not sure why you'd SS it in Defense, considering you already destroyed that monster once, and get the chance to battle it again with 1000 less ATK. [/quote] [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1323130925' post='5689428'] I thought the effect stated it's SSed in ATK Posiiton. If not, it's your Effect, so you'd pick the Battle Position. I'm not sure why you'd SS it in Defense, considering you already destroyed that monster once, and get the chance to battle it again with 1000 less ATK. [/quote] was just checkin to see who had control of its position when its resummoned otherwise your opponent would just put it in Defense >.>. But ok good to know that controller of him picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 Actually, I should maybe clarify slightly. The player directed to Special Summon chooses Battle Position if it's not specifically stated ATK or DEF Position. If it says "Your opponent Special Summons..." they pick. If it tells you to SS something, even to opponent's field, you pick the Battle Position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathSDelano Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1323131384' post='5689457'] Actually, I should maybe clarify slightly. The player directed to Special Summon chooses Battle Position if it's not specifically stated ATK or DEF Position. If it says "Your opponent Special Summons..." they pick. If it tells you to SS something, even to opponent's field, you pick the Battle Position. [/quote] ok so in others words since this is Specifically Special Summoning the monster it killed you pick right? (sorry just trying to get clear picture of this guy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 ok so it still sucks :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 Number 32 directs YOU to Special Summon the destroyed monster to your opponent's Field. You'd pick the Battle Position, because you're the one Special Summoning the monster, regardless of the fact it's (probably) your opponent's monster from their Graveyard. If it said "Your opponent Special Summons the destroyed monster...", then they'd choose the Battle Position, assuming the text doesn't specifically tell them what Battle Position to pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeathSDelano Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1323132017' post='5689498'] Number 32 directs YOU to Special Summon the destroyed monster to your opponent's Field. You'd pick the Battle Position, because you're the one Special Summoning the monster, regardless of the fact it's (probably) your opponent's monster from their Graveyard. If it said "Your opponent Special Summons the destroyed monster...", then they'd choose the Battle Position, assuming the text doesn't specifically tell them what Battle Position to pick. [/quote] alright got it now thanks. Seems like something for a fun decks and I would use this in my ALO deck for the lulz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 IRL please lose the once per turn and we are done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 It was used by III, but he used a Continuous Spell that made the summoning requirements of an Xyz Monster -1 monster (So he overlaid 2 Level 4 monsters to summon this). However, when that Continuous Spell is destroyed, the Xyz Monster's control switches. III used Number 32's eff, so Shark decided it was safe to take it, unlike in Acid Golem. Shark summoned [size=8][b][color=#FF0000]S[/color] [color=#FF8C00]K[/color] [color=#FFD700]U[/color] [color=#FFFF00]L[/color] [color=#00FF00]L[/color] [color=#008000]K [/color][color=#2F4F4F]R[/color] [color=#008080][/color] [color=#000080]K[/color] [color=#0000FF]E[/color] [color=#4B0082]N[/color][/b][/size] To destroy that Cont. And he took control of Number 32. After Shark won the duel, III gave it to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 Shark likes his new Numbers monster (that probably and hopefully won't possess him this time). Now, I like this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend Zero Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='Darkplant - FEAR' timestamp='1323142941' post='5690032'] It was used by III, but he used a Continuous Spell that made the summoning requirements of an Xyz Monster -1 monster (So he overlaid 2 Level 4 monsters to summon this). [/quote] Was just about to ask about this. Should've been only 2, but I guess Konami is cautious around that ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 without gate to the fa**** world, it can run over Grapha, b**** of fa**** world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='Legend Zero' timestamp='1323181645' post='5690482'] Was just about to ask about this. Should've been only 2, but I guess Konami is cautious around that ATK. [/quote] Considering the effect and ATK, 3 Materials is acceptable. But it won't be as good competitively as Disigma or Shock Ruler. But it's better than Tin Archduke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='evilfusion' timestamp='1323185767' post='5690544'] Considering the effect and ATK, 3 Materials is acceptable. But it won't be as good competitively as Disigma or Shock Ruler. But it's better than Tin Archduke. [/quote] Fun similary to Archduke is that TA has an effect similar to Junk Garnda and Number 32 resembles Nitro Warrior Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 If it was deliberate, they should probably stop imitating Synchros with non-Verz Xyz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legendary Dragon Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 I know a certain DN duelist will love this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 Konami must release this un-nerfed in Galactic Overlord. Otherwise, I will use their back-end as the Pedestal of Time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 [quote name='Shard' timestamp='1323183121' post='5690497'] without gate to the fa**** world, it can run over Grapha, b**** of fa**** world. [/quote] Are you from New Jersey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Berserker- Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 As I always say, I don't care for the ammount of materials when I play Coelacanth. But this one also fits the Deep Sea theme. I want it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.