werewolfjedi Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='Fire King Hi-Oh' timestamp='1323128783' post='5689326'] It's another form of naming the same type of metal/ore. The Atlantean origin of it remains the same regardless of how one spells it. Orichalcos = Orichalcum. Look it up sometime. [/quote] dartz would use xyz over synchros with the way he summons though with the seal, you could basically break the game anyway you slice it so, yeah. I find this being a trap makes it fair, and since xyz depend on their materials for their effects a majority of the time, there is a penalty to use it, but the 3 materials become more reasonable for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommanderVolt Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 If this was made into the TCG, i would make GemKnightWiththeBIgEye.dek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 OMG BEST IDEA EVER! Makes a normally dead Sabersaurus or whatever into Laggia! OMFG IM SMART Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='Welche' timestamp='1323141488' post='5689977'] OMG BEST IDEA EVER! Makes a normally dead Sabersaurus or whatever into Laggia! OMFG IM SMART [/quote] Except this card doesn't become an Xyz Material, so Laggia will have 1 Material, and its effect requires detaching 2. Then again, I'm inclined to think you're either being sarcastic or trolly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 Sarcastic, anyway if you were half smart, Dolkka would be basically just as good in the situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='werewolfjedi' timestamp='1323135404' post='5689668'] I find this being a trap makes it fair, and since xyz depend on their materials for their effects a majority of the time, there is a penalty to use it, but the 3 materials become more reasonable for sure. [/quote] It's a Spell ._. Orichalcum is from Atlantean Tales and is a Gold-ish Copper alloy IRL And the card seems hilarious but Risky- Outside acid golem being made from 1 monster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lightray Daedalus- Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1323147312' post='5690162'] It's a Spell ._. Orichalcum is from Atlantean Tales and is a Gold-ish Copper alloy IRL And the card seems hilarious but Risky- Outside acid golem being made from 1 monster [/quote] Haven't you ever read Chaos 39 and Plotemys? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welche the crab Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 So like xyz orichaclos archetype anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='-Venser el Transeúnte-' timestamp='1323147456' post='5690168'] Haven't you ever read Chaos 39 and Plotemys? [/quote] Chaos 39 is a f***ing stupid use for this, considering it's already only 2 materials if you're doing it right =/ I forgot Ptolemys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evilfusion Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1323147532' post='5690171'] Chaos 39 is a f***ing stupid use for this, considering it's already only 2 materials if you're doing it right =/ I forgot Ptolemys. [/quote] Actually, Chaos Number 39 isn't THAT bad of an idea. Use this and any Level 4 for Utopia. Overlay Utopia for Chaos Number 39, removing this card's influence on it. Hence, Chaos Number 39 for 1 card. It'd only have 2 Materials, though. Though as I'd like to point out, you still use the same number of resources with this card. The biggest difference is the 3 Materials are much, much easier to bring out because bringing out 2 monsters is a cinch, but 3 monsters is usually more effort than it's worth. This card is kind of like Xyz Plant, but not broken. It carries a huge risk, but can make ANY 2 Material Xyz in exchange for using only 1 monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werewolfjedi Posted December 6, 2011 Report Share Posted December 6, 2011 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1323147312' post='5690162'] It's a Spell ._. [/quote] oh oops I said the wrong thing XP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANDAA BORUTO Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 This stacks, right? If it does, it is pretty much saying "Normal Summon your entire Extra Deck if you draw 3 of this on your first turn". Card is ridiclous. Should at least be BKSS'ed into not stacking when printed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiithepeople Posted December 7, 2011 Report Share Posted December 7, 2011 [quote name='Like The Wind' timestamp='1323221059' post='5691768'] This stacks, right? If it does, it is pretty much saying "Normal Summon your entire Extra Deck if you draw 3 of this on your first turn". Card is ridiclous. Should at least be BKSS'ed into not stacking when printed. [/quote] The wording will tell you that it will stack, but Konami says "no". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.