Orochi Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 you are whinning a lot... when ude/konami decides to unlimit a card it is because that card is not that good at all... happened with D.D. assailant, reflect bounder or exiled force, and who runs 3 of them in a good or competitive deck?? also, the ban of COTH is because is a chainable card, and it performs nasty combos with jinzo and sangan when is about to be destroyed... with 3 jinzo this card is pointless... monster reborn is a good choice now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Under_Age_User Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 you are whinning a lot... when ude/konami decides to unlimit a card it is because that card is not that good at all... happened with D.D. assailant' date=' reflect bounder or exiled force, and who runs 3 of them in a good or competitive deck?? also, the ban of COTH is because is a chainable card, and it performs nasty combos with jinzo and sangan when is about to be destroyed... with 3 jinzo this card is pointless... monster reborn is a good choice now...[/quote'] Stop talking. Please. Stop taking what Konami says as gospel. "Lol, Monster Reborn is banned! It's too broken! ... Wait, it's limited now? Well... it's not broken anymore, because Konami says so! Lol!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Max Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 Monster Reborn Unbanned.... I stopped reading right there. I've said it before and will say it again. Monster Reborn was one of the "7 Staples" An Extremely broken card that can change the game in a Heartbeat. The Ability to get ANY monster from EITHER Graveyard makes it one of the most broken cards there is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAG Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 Well, 3 Jinzos is nothin' compared to the unbanning of Monster Reborn. Now that's nuts. Like I said b4, this will definately shifft the balance of gameplay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 Who is even going to run 3 Jinzos?I am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 Jinzos make good Tokens. Right after it was announced that Jinzo was being Unlimited, I went out and bought 20 for around $2 a piece. Then I made a giant Jinzo card house. After that, I decided that they would be my Tokens when I play IRL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 Who is even going to run 3 Jinzos? 2 is overkill in my opinion. Chaoserver runs three' date=' one of them is mine. I think your statement died there. Monster Reborn is actually a change for the better. It makes OTK easier by far the ban of COTH is because is a chainable card, and it performs nasty combos with jinzo and sangan when is about to be destroyed... If call is activated first, and then MST/Dust Tornado, you don't get nasty effects. Call honestly wasn't too great, its not banned for goodness, simply to keep decent revival cards at two. For the next three months, the top decks will remain ones with DMoC in them (dark armed dragon for the absolute best), and arguably fast playing OTK's like plants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutant Monster RAEG-HAPYP Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 3 Jinzos will basically shut down an Uria deck... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 you are whinning a lot... when ude/konami decides to unlimit a card it is because that card is not that good at all... happened with D.D. assailant' date=' reflect bounder or exiled force, and who runs 3 of them in a good or competitive deck?? also, the ban of COTH is because is a chainable card, and it performs nasty combos with jinzo and sangan when is about to be destroyed... with 3 jinzo this card is pointless... monster reborn is a good choice now...[/quote'] Stop talking. Please. Stop taking what Konami says as gospel. "Lol, Monster Reborn is banned! It's too broken! ... Wait, it's limited now? Well... it's not broken anymore, because Konami says so! Lol!" please, don't start with that... every one knows that unbanning MR is an experiment to control some combos, but really... give it a thought... monster reborn can be only activated on your turn, D.D. crow is a massive card now that can control opponent's grave, to control your own grave there's transmigration prophecy, also with equal chances to revive monsters from either's grave you can use your opponent's DMoC or disk commander, so what's the big deal?? i never said MR is broken, but really i'd like to see a DMoC emergency ban... also, konami says nothing, UDE says... and relax, it's just a game and it's just 6 months... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 you are whinning a lot... when ude/konami decides to unlimit a card it is because that card is not that good at all... happened with D.D. assailant' date=' reflect bounder or exiled force, and who runs 3 of them in a good or competitive deck?? also, the ban of COTH is because is a chainable card, and it performs nasty combos with jinzo and sangan when is about to be destroyed... with 3 jinzo this card is pointless... monster reborn is a good choice now...[/quote'] Stop talking. Please. Stop taking what Konami says as gospel. "Lol, Monster Reborn is banned! It's too broken! ... Wait, it's limited now? Well... it's not broken anymore, because Konami says so! Lol!" please, don't start with that... every one knows that unbanning MR is an experiment to control some combos, but really... give it a thought... monster reborn can be only activated on your turn, D.D. crow is a massive card now that can control opponent's grave, to control your own grave there's transmigration prophecy, also with equal chances to revive monsters from either's grave you can use your opponent's DMoC or disk commander, so what's the big deal?? i never said MR is broken, but really i'd like to see a DMoC emergency ban... also, konami says nothing, UDE says... and relax, it's just a game and it's just 6 months... So controlling some comboes (lol wut) just so that DDT can get faster is a valid reason to unban Monster Reborn? lol counter argument. Anti-Raigeki counters Raigeki. Unlimit Raigeki. AAU can revive from my opponenet's graveyard as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 who's talking about a stupid single card that controls a stupid single card?? i'm talking about several REAL WAYS to control a card... your counter is pointless... call of the grave ain't going to be played because MR is unbanned... so, if AAU can do that, why you didn't used AAU before, since you prefer that instead MR?? i think this discussion is hypocrit and unnecesary... specially because every of those who complains about unbanning MR will use it on their decks and OF COURSE they will make DDT, DMoC OTK and/or any other deck that abuses of special summoning... prove me i'm wrong and i give you a cookie... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 Monster Reborn is no doubt a good card, and possibly capitilizes some things (DDT), but by no means "SIODJFKJASHDK THIS IS GOINBG TO COMPLETELY REVAMP TH E ENTIRE META". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 who's talking about a stupid single card that controls a stupid single card?? i'm talking about several REAL WAYS to control a card... your counter is pointless... call of the grave ain't going to be played because MR is unbanned... so' date=' if AAU can do that, why you didn't used AAU before, since you prefer that instead MR?? i think this discussion is hypocrit and unnecesary... specially because every of those who complains about unbanning MR will use it on their decks and OF COURSE they will make DDT, DMoC OTK and/or any other deck that abuses of special summoning... prove me i'm wrong and i give you a cookie...[/quote'] Dark Bribe, Solemn Judgement, Magic Drain, Spell Shield Type-8, Magic Jammer, and Cursed Seal of the Forbidden Spell counter Raigeki. Unlimit Raigeki. I didn't use AAU because I didn't have Arms Hole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 and you didn't reply the 3rd statement, so you will use MR even when "it's broken and don't has to be unbanned"... i'm eating one cookie ¬¬ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 Please stop butchering our language. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 sorry, but i can't use my language with you... so please understand... second cookie... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 23, 2008 Report Share Posted February 23, 2008 Okay thanks. Reply: MR isn't broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 Okay thanks. Reply: MR isn't broken. that's what i'm saying... but some people don't understand... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedSceptile Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 I don't recall saying Monster Reborn is broken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 The only thing remotely wrong is the long list of cards not banned, and tbh, Monster Reborn isn't all that high on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 The only thing remotely wrong is the long list of cards not banned' date=' and tbh, Monster Reborn isn't all that high on it.[/quote'] *cough*cybertwin*cough* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 i think this discussion is hypocrit and unnecesary... specially because every of those who complains about unbanning MR will use it on their decks and OF COURSE they will make DDT' date=' DMoC OTK and/or any other deck that abuses of special summoning... prove me i'm wrong and i give you a cookie...[/quote'] Of course I'll use it. I want to remain competitive, however that doesn't mean I would ever want to be lucksacked by the least skillful legal topdeck in the game. "Monster Reborn your Disk Commander. Draw 2. Sac for . GG" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 so? next match send disk commander to the side deck and put something more useful... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chaos Pudding Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 so? next match send disk commander to the side deck and put something more useful... Uh... there really isn't a replacement for Disk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gravitize Me Cap'n! Posted February 24, 2008 Report Share Posted February 24, 2008 lol Orochi, get better, then post. And learn English. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.