CNo.101 S.H. Death Knight Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 [quote name='Mysty' timestamp='1331254709' post='5862520'] But how do you fit that into the loop? Last I checked, you load 2 100Eye dragons and 1 mirage in, but you search out Mirage and two random cards instead. How do we alter the procedure such that to allow true infinite, or does the current loop already do that? [/quote] Icwutdarkplantdidthere, even though if you thinning out cards in your Deck, you can redo emeral loop 1 more time since the opening procress of emeral and ouroboros loops are the same, so you can return 3 more monsters to your Deck before going to the ouroboros loop. this will eliminate deck thinning problem. so I guess this IS inifinite. OT: if you ask me this loops is more than long enough to get the opponent DC'd lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 [quote name='~Poker Face~' timestamp='1331257641' post='5862568'] Icwutdarkplantdidthere, even though if you thinning out cards in your Deck, you can redo emeral loop 1 more time since the opening procress of emeral and ouroboros loops are the same, so you can return 3 more monsters to your Deck before going to the ouroboros loop. this will eliminate deck thinning problem. so I guess this IS inifinite. OT: if you ask me this loops is more than long enough to get the opponent DC'd lol [/quote] Emeral loop still requires SS a banished mirage and the loop doesn't replace it, and the Ouroboros loop requires 2 Hundred Eyes. I'm pretty sure this loop is missing a second loop to ensure it doesn't run out. I need to see a video of this loop in action since I got bored trying to do it myself on DN. You can actually probably do this loop for 45 minutes to end the round with you winning one game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 Hmmmmm........ Another idiotic Unfarnity Loop that takes 3x longer than if Trish was in the loop? [IMG]http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/249/257/09f.png[/IMG] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 I must be the only one here who isn't seeing how this helps Infernities. This doesn't do anything against the cards that rape the deck the worst (Crow, Maxx, and Veiler) and if you're not worrying about those cards you can push for game with a much smaller loop. I don't need another five hundred Infernity loops. I need an out to Maxx/Veiler/Crow and I need a way to make the deck more consistent, and anyone who thinks that Brionac is the problem with Infernities clearly hasn't played the deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 [quote name='Nightmare Zarkus' timestamp='1331259941' post='5862620'] and anyone who thinks that Brionac is the problem with Infernities clearly hasn't played the deck. [/quote] Thank you for reading the topic and not just generalizing without thinking. We're saying Brionac is an issue on its own, because it simply exists to OTK and Loop like a b****, with no purpose outside those. Will it be banned? No, because this isn't going to top anything. It's like Future Fusion- Broken as all hell, but it won't see the list until it gets that one last push into consistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDDRodrigo Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 Also, we clearly said that this LOOP's problem is Brionac, not the deck's problem. But banning Archfiend would kill the deck forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resident Fascist Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 It also involves an Xyz. It can't be hit because konami are too busy jacking off about [color=#006400][size=8][b]£££££[/b][/size][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1331260167' post='5862625'] We're saying Brionac is an issue on its own, because it simply exists to OTK and Loop like a b****, with no purpose outside those. [/quote] I did read the whole topic. I just jumped the gun and didn't explain what I meant fully >_> I think a lot of the problem with Brionac stems from cards that are already broken on their own. Perfect example is this. Brionac doesn't exist solely to create loops, it's just that it has so many that's what people associate with. I could be mistaken, though. Is there a viable Brionac loop that doesn't involve an already banworthy card (or set of cards)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 Wow, all of you guys are in such a frenzy like a bunch of gay pirannhas. Just why not make the deck unviable and kill Archfiend as well as Brionac? Then, there will no longer be a possibility of Infernities being Infernities and boring their opponents to death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 We want balance. Konami wants Pounds n' Dollars. This loop will be here a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Michael Geren Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2nBA0YoGuM&feature=plcp&context=C4b4a0baVDvjVQa1PpcFM-1A2iCpGYVFql_V9b5jHSSJtusUweNug="]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2nBA0YoGuM&feature=plcp&context=C4b4a0baVDvjVQa1PpcFM-1A2iCpGYVFql_V9b5jHSSJtusUweNug=[/url] Looks like Konami needs to ban Ouroboros now too i chess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 [quote name='Koloktos' timestamp='1331260582' post='5862638'] Wow, all of you guys are in such a frenzy like a bunch of gay pirannhas. Just why not make the deck unviable and kill Archfiend as well as Brionac? Then, there will no longer be a possibility of Infernities being Infernities and boring their opponents to death. [/quote] Read earlier. I said limit Hundred Eyes in addition to ban Brio, if you want to kill Infernities without slaughtering them, but, who knows, the dragon might be like Zenmaity- Works with even 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 I did, and I still want to slaughter Infernities. They are a decktype that should have never existed. Even if you take out the loops, Konami will always make a new card that can loop with Infernities. YOU CAN'T DENY THAT TRUTH, FOR THIS IS KONAMI WE ARE TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!!!!! Hitting Archfiend in addition to the other cards will make sure that the 40+ minute loop will never exist again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 I could write a book on the number of loops I've done with Infernities Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greiga Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 [quote name='Koloktos' timestamp='1331260968' post='5862650'] I did, and I still want to slaughter Infernities. They are a decktype that should have never existed. [/quote] Stop playing the rift between casual and meta and actually go play meta sometime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 [quote name='Greiga te Jalokia' timestamp='1331261253' post='5862666'] Stop playing the rift between casual and meta and actually go play meta sometime. [/quote] It's pretty obvious that you don't understand that there are decks that aren't in the format that shouldn't exist. People complain about Exodia, but they don't win games. Yet, it is Decks like them that make the game unfun. Infernities happens to be one of those decks that people complain about, and with good reason too. Yu-Gi-Oh isn't a democracy: It is a dictatorship. Liberal Thinking will not get us anywhere, but hard thinking will. That is why we need to make sure that decks that shouldn't exist should never be viable again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Perfection Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 Im pretty sure konami was planning this loop all along and they made cards like Leviair, Emeral and even Ourboros just for this loop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 Wait so. Kill Brionac. Kill loops. And people b**** about needing to kill Infernities? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CNo.101 S.H. Death Knight Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 [quote name='evilchris' timestamp='1331287534' post='5862848'] Wait so. Kill Brionac. Kill loops. And people b**** about needing to kill Infernities? [/quote] That what's baffle me... severely... Gald I'm not the only who see that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunshine Jesse Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 [quote name='Nightmare Zarkus' timestamp='1331260497' post='5862636'] I could be mistaken, though. Is there a viable Brionac loop that doesn't involve an already banworthy card (or set of cards)? [/quote] and Mirage is the main problem with Infernities if you ask me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted March 9, 2012 Report Share Posted March 9, 2012 Brionac is really the only problem because it enables many loops nowadays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.