Toffee. Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 No seriously, I can't really read the rest of his name, but this image popped up on the wiki about an hour ago.Effect, based on what I can make out:2 level 6 monsters.This card's Attribute is also treated as DARK. Once per turn, you can detach 1 Xyz Material monster from this card: Destroy 1 Spell, Trap, or Monster card that your Opponent controls.WHAT IS THIS I DON'T EVEN....Discuss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dworkin Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Inzektor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mu-12 Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Never has a card been more fake than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 You can tell by the way it's worded. It's bogus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Inzektor?It's name starts with a T.But yea, Inzektors could easily make this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest .Rai Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Fake card is fake. Look at de stats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest evilkokonoe Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Fake. Look at the ATK/DEF font.EDIT: F*** Rai. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mu-12 Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Besides, a number being printed on English before than in Japanese? Never. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dworkin Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Ohhh. Yeah. Also, the pic looks questionable as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Better question is, why the hell does the Wiki still have this image up?Also, I found this rather amusing: It has no set number. I mean if someone is going to fake an image, at least make it seem legit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest .Rai Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Lol at 200100100 serial number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas★Zero Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Would be hilarious to find out that even though this card is fake the image may show that monster as the legit 46 tho I highly doubt this. Also those stats and no Pack code show how fake it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingdom Xathers Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Actually, I think its number is 100. Other than that, I can just barely make out the word "Twilight" (fitting, considering its effect). ... but yeah, that card's totally fake. I wouldn't be surprised if this topic gets locked soon (though it's not really the OP's fault). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birkeland Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Found it a while ago. Name's "Number 100: Twilight Nebula Knight". Probably not made by the same guy. Link is here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Found it a while ago. Name's "Number 100: Twilight Nebula Knight". Probably not made by the same guy. Link is here.>October 18, 2011 I LOL'd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miror B Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Lol at 200100100 serial number.Yea I noticed it too. Plus DEF actually goes too far to the right to and bleeds into the effect-box border. On top of that name bleeds under the attribute. You know a guy did a sh*tty job when I can tell it's fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 You know a guy did a sh*tty job when I can tell it's fake.There are also too many things that clearly point out the fact its fake. Regardless, the wiki still has this image up xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birkeland Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Still wish that image was a little clearer, it looks awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 20, 2012 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Still wish that image was a little clearer, it looks awesome.This.If he goes out of his way to print it on glossy paper(I'm assuming he did) and then put it in a card binder... Why couldn't he properly photograph it? :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dragon Sage Ω Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 Did better than the last guy who posted custom cards to lolwiki. Not saying much though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingdom Xathers Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 An addendum to the Card Artwork Ruling: If the image is super special awesome, then it either: A: has a terrible effectB: was make using a Card Maker and is thus fake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birkeland Posted March 20, 2012 Report Share Posted March 20, 2012 This.If he goes out of his way to print it on glossy paper(I'm assuming he did) and then put it in a card binder... Why couldn't he properly photograph it? :/Just another one of his many when making this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.