Jump to content

Solemn Judgement grows wings. (Xyz Daily) (Day 4) - NERFED. Hopefully fixed.


Recommended Posts

I couldn't find a picture that fits what I had in mind so I had to settle with the closest one. I have an Alternate Artwork for this, and if I at least get 2 comments I'll upload that as well.

[spoiler=V.1]
[img]http://i45.tinypic.com/2djdxsp.jpg[/img]
[/spoiler]
[spoiler=V1.1]
[img]http://i50.tinypic.com/2hfrot4.jpg[/img]
[/spoiler]
[spoiler=V1.2]
[img]http://i50.tinypic.com/2vd5z05.jpg[/img]
[/spoiler]
[img]http://i48.tinypic.com/9aqqzd.jpg[/img]
(I'm fully aware Solemn's effect is much different but I think it's the closest card that I can compare this with, other than Evolkaiser Laggia)

It's like Laggia but more flexible! I think I fail at every level concerning originality, but I think it would at least be a staple for anyone who uses at least 2 level 4 monsters. It dodges Royal Decree and other anti-traps.

Card Changes: 7/6/2012: Changed Summoning Requirement.
7/6/2012: Nerfed
7/7/2012: Nerfed again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgive me if this goes against the nature of your card, but could you give it a type requirement so it doesn't get abused with Rabbit? Plants, while they do have 2 Level 4 vanillas, seem like an alright idea since those two vanillas are horrendously weak, Psychics are even better (given they have no vanillas whatsoever), Rocks might be alright since they have only one strong target (same as Sea Serpents), and Thunders have a weak and a meh vanilla.

It's just that a double-Solemn that walks that can be abused with Rabbit is probably going to single-handedly make a tier 0 or 1 deck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a better Laggia-Dolkka...what is the question here? How is this not shattered (I feel like broken is too small a word)

Its spell speed 3, tier 0 foolishness, the best way to fix would be give it a type restriction, get rid of that spell speed 3 clause, and make it both material instead of one. Hmmm that sounds like...Laggia or Dolkka. Man even with all of that its still better. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Beginning446' timestamp='1341545258' post='5968307']
Its a better Laggia-Dolkka...what is the question here? How is this not shattered (I feel like broken is too small a word)

Its spell speed 3, tier 0 foolishness, the best way to fix would be give it a type restriction, get rid of that spell speed 3 clause, and make it both material instead of one. Hmmm that sounds like...Laggia or Dolkka. Man even with all of that its still better. lol
[/quote]

Well, its basically my trademark of making tier 0/1 cards that could turn the meta around completely, either in a bad way or a good way. And if I nerf it like how you suggested it, it won't have such a great impact on the meta IMO. Well, the only way I know to nerf it and still make it game-breaking is by making it both materials like you said. But I won't do it until another person comments on this. Still, thanks for leaving a comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Dread☆プロイセン' timestamp='1341546112' post='5968334']
Well, its basically my trademark of making tier 0/1 cards that could turn the meta around completely, either in a bad way or a good way. And if I nerf it like how you suggested it, it won't have such a great impact on the meta IMO. Well, the only way I know to nerf it and still make it game-breaking is by making it both materials like you said. But I won't do it until another person comments on this. Still, thanks for leaving a comment.
[/quote]

Doesn't matter if your "trademark" is to make meta defining cards, the card at hand is still broken as s***. Think about it, it's a generic Laggia + Dollka hybrid minus the Summoning negation, which doesn't matter at all. Doesn't require any dedication to run and is literally, a walking Counter Trap Card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='CharlesScene' timestamp='1341591391' post='5968644']
Wow, this card is way too overpowered.
Destroy the card when it uses his effect and make it pay 2k life points then it may come close to being balanced.
[/quote]

Now hold on, sir. I feel that's a bit much. Think about this: It requires two materials that CANNOT be searched by Rabbit, it detaches both Xyz Materials for its effect, and it's not all that powerful statistically. Now, it's about on-par with Laggia and Dolkka, and is not as broken as something like Raigeki or Tribe-Infecting Virus. If you add the fact that you need to pay Solemn Warning's Cost AND destroy the monster, it's just not worth it anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='-Dharc-' timestamp='1341592624' post='5968662']
Now hold on, sir. I feel that's a bit much. Think about this: It requires two materials that CANNOT be searched by Rabbit, it detaches both Xyz Materials for its effect, and it's not all that powerful statistically. Now, it's about on-par with Laggia and Dolkka, and is not as broken as something like Raigeki or Tribe-Infecting Virus. If you add the fact that you need to pay Solemn Warning's Cost AND destroy the monster, it's just not worth it anymore.
[/quote]
Yes, the problem with laggia and dolkka is that these should get banned imo.
Then destroy the monster and pay 1k lifepoints, its a huge effect and it ignores stuff like mirror force, magic cylinder and so on so its just way too strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you don't seem to realize is that IT ISN'T STRONG. After you use the effect, you're left with a Normal monster with 2000 ATK/ 1000 DEF. You know how many things run over that? A LOT. Everything from Black Luster Soldier to Utopia Ray. Heck, even if it's in Defense Position, Photon Butterspy kills it [i]and[/i] delivers a swift quick to your Life Points.

...Oh wow. Just noticed "Cannot be chained to."

...There's no balancing that. That's just OP'ed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[center]Make it such that it has to detach Exceed Material each time an effect is activated, something like Doomcaliber Knight -- but to compensate you'll have it detach 1 Exceed Material per effect activation attempt instead.[/center]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...