TheTurtleOnceCalledGod Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 [img]http://images.wikia.com/yugioh/images/5/58/MadolcheMajoleine-REDU-JP-R.jpg[/img] Level 4 Earth Spellcaster ATK 1400 DEF 1200 When this card is [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Destroy"]destroyed[/url] by your opponent and sent to the [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Graveyard"]Graveyard[/url]: [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Shuffle"]Shuffle[/url] it into your [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Deck"]Deck[/url]. When this card is [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Normal_Summon"]Normal[/url] or [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Flip_Summon"]Flip Summoned[/url]: You can add 1 "[url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Madolche"]Madolche[/url]" [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Monster_Card"]monster[/url] from your Deck to your [url="http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Hand"]hand[/url]. Discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mido9 Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 Amazing card that makes the madolce deck consistent. Now we just need to get that pesky ultimate offering gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 This isn't amazing. It's just another piss-poorly designed card for a piss-poorly designed archetype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 [quote name='Vengevine' timestamp='1343419574' post='5990420'] This isn't amazing. It's just another piss-poorly designed card for a piss-poorly designed archetype. [/quote] You obviously have pent-up issues. Go play Mother 3 if you feel that way. OT: Madolches need a searchable Double Summon, but add more summons to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted July 27, 2012 Report Share Posted July 27, 2012 [url=http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/desu]I just noticed her eyes are green and pink.[/url] Oh, and the Madolches have infinite copies of this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Is it a fork on one end and a spoon on the other? Why is the cream on the end of the fork that doesn't have tines? Who does that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warden Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Majoleine is basically a witch, so to the Madolches a flying fork is the equivalent of a broom. And obviously it's a collectible fork, they tend to have unusual designs to the ones you actually eat with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 [quote name='BrokenHeart15' timestamp='2243004907' post='5990693'] Majoleine is basically a witch, so to the Madolches a flying fork is the equivalent of a broom. [/quote] I know that...I don't think a "collectible" piece of silverware would be designed with food on it. Is it a French or Italian thing to put cream on the [color=#8b4513]handle[/color] of a dessert implement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warden Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 It's obviously a design and not actual food. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihop Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 1900 Stratos that goes back to hand when it dies is a little bit good right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 [quote name='Vengevine' timestamp='1343419574' post='5990420'] This isn't amazing. It's just another piss-poorly designed card for a piss-poorly designed archetype. [/quote] How do you figure the archetype is "piss-poorly designed". I would love to hear your reasoning coming from a DW player such as yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agro Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 [quote name='Canadian' timestamp='1343486472' post='5990954'] How do you figure the archetype is "piss-poorly designed". I would love to hear your reasoning coming from a DW player such as yourself. [/quote]*grabs some popcorn* Hey look, a Canadian trying to go for gold in summer. This should end well. OT: It's actually well designed. :\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 [quote name='Canadian' timestamp='1343486472' post='5990954'] How do you figure the archetype is "piss-poorly designed". I would love to hear your reasoning coming from a DW player such as yourself. [/quote] They either suck, or they OTK. .-. And I find that ironic coming from someone that can't play yugioh unless they're playing an OTK deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mido9 Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 The deck can still play a nice control factor with the chateau,queen,factory or xyzing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 Chateau totally isn't broken card design. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonk Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 [quote name='Vengevine' timestamp='1343491034' post='5991006'] Chateau totally isn't broken card design. [/quote] Just. Go home and play the Mother trilogy. It will get you off from thinking about Madolches further. OT: It makes Madolches more consistent. Now, if only Spellcasters had a RotA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mugendramon Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 [quote name='Vengevine' timestamp='1343491034' post='5991006'] Chateau totally isn't broken card design. [/quote] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Posted July 28, 2012 Report Share Posted July 28, 2012 [quote name='Vengevine' timestamp='1343488998' post='5990984'] They either suck, or they OTK. .-. And I find that ironic coming from someone that can't play yugioh unless they're playing an OTK deck. [/quote] Well you obviously haven't played them enough or against them. They act much like wind-ups or gadgets when they don't open with Ultimate Offering. The deck has really good synergy and can even double as a Village control deck if wanted. Oh and I have been playing Machina Gadgets for the past 2 weeks or so since they will dominate next format, and before that I played Chaos Dragons so I don't really understand how thats all I play since they've only been around for about 2 months. But keep trying, its cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahamut - Envoy of the End Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 Card is lovely and Madolche need something like it, although in hindsight level 3 might have been preferable for those of us who don't like OTK loops. This + Chateau + Offering seems pretty much good game, although that can easily be neutered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blake Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 This is absolutely abysmal design. A searcher is one thing, but a searcher that can recycle itself is just stupid. They don't deserve this, at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahamut - Envoy of the End Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 [quote name='Yuzuru Otonashi' timestamp='1343580543' post='5991889'] This is absolutely abysmal design. A searcher is one thing, but a searcher that can recycle itself is just stupid. They don't deserve this, at all. [/quote] Not that I would attempt to claim to be an authority over you here, far from, but all in combination with other cards surely? I mean that it returns to the deck when its destroyed (if you don't have the other combination parts out) means not only is it harder to recycle than it would be from the graveyard like something like Sangan, but fattens your deck as well. The fat deck issue is why they initially needed something to bring out Puddingcess et all. Surely get rid of Offering and its loop is killed and its average again, right? (Probably wrong, but would rather you explain it to me that I am than not say anything ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This Account is Unplayable Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 At its absolute worst, it's an infinite Gadget. At its "best" it's an OTK. There is no "good design" to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Rai Posted July 29, 2012 Report Share Posted July 29, 2012 Considering the archetype is entirely reliant on a Field Spell, yeah, it's bad design. Not to mention whoever thought giving Madolches a searcher that's a monster is crazy. Had this been some sort of vaguely generic Spell searcher, fine by me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Doodle Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 You think that if it was given a once-per-turn clause it'd be better than if it wasn't able to search another copy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newhat Posted July 30, 2012 Report Share Posted July 30, 2012 'The effect of "Madolche Majoleine" can only be activated once per turn.' That kills the OTK, but some chumptrinos think two Majoleines shouldn't be able to search each other indefinitely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.